Because the deprivation of convicts' rights is (or should be) only such deprivation as is consistent with their punishment. And we dealt with that in a case called Eisenstadt, where the court held that a state may not make pregnancy a punishment.
That you would seriously propose that pregnancy should be a punishment (which is what you are proposing, make no mistake) reflects a hatred of women so deep and twisted that one must question whether you are a danger to women.
But if we force them to bear the children, that'll help a lot!
Not us. The victim.
In this case it's not a matter of punishment but of the rights of the victim.
Heck, maybe even exchange that for imprisonment.
And yes, statistics show that sexual predators are often so as a result of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse as children or later. There is a cause and effect there and so we can be sympathetic. But that does not excuse the assault.
As an example, a pedophiles is statistically probably a victim himself. But still, it is our responsibility to make help available and the pedophiles to seek help. We can sympathize with his condition, but we can't excuse his actions. I would never judge a non,-criminal pedophiles, but still expect him to seek help before he hurts someone.
The same applies here. I can sympathize with a person, man or woman, who feels compelled to watch porn, pay for or sell sex for sexual gratification, commit sexual assault or commit other such deviant acts. I remember reading one statistic that showed that most men who pay for sex have often suffered some form of abuse as children.
However, feeling a compulsion to act and to act are two different things. If he feels such a compulsion, it's his obligation to seek help, not ours to permit and excuse his actions.
That they let a person as deranged as you vote is perhaps the most eloquent condemnation of democracy.
Ad hominem.
By the way, since I'm anonymous on this board, I am a man who had suffered sexual coercion in a severely emotionally abusive relationship with a woman many years ago. She'd even threatened suicide once with a knife pointed at her chest when I wanted to break the relationship up.
Ironically, she is the one who eventually broke the relationship off once I had become suicidal myself. I do know she had suffered trauma herself before having met me, and that might have played a role in that. It becomes clear how trans-generational trauma can occur.
In my case, I'd already suffered trauma before having even met her. I'll spare the details. But yes there was an emotional vulnerability on both sides. Birds if a feather I suppose.
In my case, she never got pregnant, and of course each case is different.
But in cases where a woman clearly assaults a man sexually, he is not emotionally dependent or similarly vulnerable, he is aware that that is legally an assault and can prove it and reports it right away, she becomes pregnant, and he wants to keep the baby, he should have that right.
From my personal experience, I'm well aware of how emotionally violently a woman can abuse a man or coerce him into sex under the right conditions.
