Puck You, Putin! Harper Stands Up To Russia's Newest Czar

Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,164
9,435
113
Washington DC
Woulda been more impressive if he spelled all the words right.

Unfortunately, exposure to the semi-literate right-wing press tends to have that effect.
 
hunboldt

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
Tecumsehsbones said:
Woulda been more impressive if he spelled all the words right.

Unfortunately, exposure to the semi-literate right-wing press tends to have that effect.
Click to expand...

They live in their 'own fantasies'.
the CANADIAN Foreign SERVICE is currently on 'work to rule'.foreign service workers are on strike. No papers are being processed. International students (and the universities that collect their fees) are concerned. Work permits for non residents (Americans, Brits, French, etc) are not being processed. Visas are not being done. I know of one person who was offered and had to turn down a 6-figure paying job because he cannot get his work permit processed as a result of the strike. We're forfeiting tax dollars.

Foreign service workers have legitimate issues and reasons for the strike (work to rule action).
 
D

DiefTheChief

Time Out
Aug 3, 2013
4
0
1
Locutus said:
Because like the cat Teddy, you came back. You couldn't stay away. :lol:
Click to expand...

- Locutus ... Actually, I can come back anytime I want to under another name and IP# but yesterday was the first time that I bothered to do so. The reason, simply, is that I have time on my hands this long weekend as we await a serious operation tomorrow on my wife and I came across this site again and saw your ridiculous and pointless defence of someone - ME - who you were monumentally stupid and hypocritical and dishonest enough to ban after assuring all and sundry here more than once that you would not do so and yet yesterday you inexplicably defended me AFTER you had banned me months ago. This and only this prompted my return and my response.

- So even if I wanted to return here for the insider knowledge and intellectual stimulation (WARNING: MASSIVE SARCASM ALERT!!!) I would not return so long as you are the moderator.

- Therefore, to repeat, you can go back to sleep once again, stirring only for occasional cuts and pastes as I will not be returning to add value to this site.

- One thing I would suggest to you is to not to be so hypocritical and weasel like as to pretend to defend me or anyone else AFTER you have praised them, assured them of your support, and then banned them on ridiculous, specious grounds.
 
gerryh

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
DiefTheChief said:
- Locutus ... Actually, I can come back anytime I want to under another name and IP# but yesterday was the first time that I bothered to do so. The reason, simply, is that I have time on my hands this long weekend as we await a serious operation tomorrow on my wife and I came across this site again and saw your ridiculous and pointless defence of someone - ME - who you were monumentally stupid and hypocritical and dishonest enough to ban after assuring all and sundry here more than once that you would not do so and yet yesterday you inexplicably defended me AFTER you had banned me months ago. This and only this prompted my return and my response.

- So even if I wanted to return here for the insider knowledge and intellectual stimulation (WARNING: MASSIVE SARCASM ALERT!!!) I would not return so long as you are the moderator.

- Therefore, to repeat, you can go back to sleep once again, stirring only for occasional cuts and pastes as I will not be returning to add value to this site.

- One thing I would suggest to you is to not to be so hypocritical and weasel like as to pretend to defend me or anyone else AFTER you have praised them, assured them of your support, and then banned them on ridiculous, specious grounds.
Click to expand...



and yet...... here you are........ stupidity knows no bounds.
 
Locutus

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
DiefTheChief said:
- Locutus ... Actually, I can come back anytime I want to under another name and IP# but yesterday was the first time that I bothered to do so. The reason, simply, is that I have time on my hands this long weekend as we await a serious operation tomorrow on my wife and I came across this site again and saw your ridiculous and pointless defence of someone - ME - who you were monumentally stupid and hypocritical and dishonest enough to ban after assuring all and sundry here more than once that you would not do so and yet yesterday you inexplicably defended me AFTER you had banned me months ago. This and only this prompted my return and my response.

- So even if I wanted to return here for the insider knowledge and intellectual stimulation (WARNING: MASSIVE SARCASM ALERT!!!) I would not return so long as you are the moderator.

- Therefore, to repeat, you can go back to sleep once again, stirring only for occasional cuts and pastes as I will not be returning to add value to this site.

- One thing I would suggest to you is to not to be so hypocritical and weasel like as to pretend to defend me or anyone else AFTER you have praised them, assured them of your support, and then banned them on ridiculous, specious grounds.
Click to expand...

Was just waiting for your confirmation daddio.

1) We knew it was you. The dashes gave you away.
2) You only had 6 more weeks to go and you were welcome back. All you had to do was wait.
3) Andem banned you back in March, not me.
4) You are gone permanently now though. My treat this time.
 
L Gilbert

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
DiefTheChief said:
- Locutus ... What compelling reason would motivate Teddy Ballgame to return to this boring ****hole frequented mainly by low information voters and posters from the lunatic left wing fringe?
Click to expand...
Really? I suppose the "Teddy" considers me to be a low-information voter and poster from the lunatic, left-wing fringe"? Yet the poor, blind fellow couldn't refute my arguments against his BS.
BTW, I am non-partisan.

Teddyderp gone? Big loss.
 
Locutus

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
The Teddy

 
SLM

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
Huh. Kinda makes Avro look all sane and rational eh?

Good grief, the level of importance some people put on the freaking internet!
 
gopher

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Quit picking on harper

This thread is officially changed to,


QUIT PICKING ON HARPER




CONservative Harper's shîtty poliTRICKs are cünting up Canada so much that a majority say it's time for the CONman to go:




The Canadian Progressive




Poll: 70% of Canadians think it’s time to kick Stephen Harper out

Obert Madondo 04 July 2013

Stephen Harper (Photo: Remy Steinegger)

An overwhelming majority of Canadians think it’s time to kick Stephen Harper out and elect a new government, according to a new CTV News Ipsos Reid poll.
70% us are fed up with Harper and the Conservatives’ dictatorship-style assault on our democratic institutions, values, science and the environment. We’re fed up with the Conservatives’ political malfeasance, epitomized by the Third World-style Senate expenses scandal. We want Harper out. We want a new regime in Ottawa.
Most importantly, we’ve resolutely decided that the Conservatives should not be re-elected in 2015.
But not every Canadian is on board. In fact, the poll has two surprises:
First, thirty per cent still feel that Harper has done a great job. That he deserves to be re-elected. The good thing is that 30% is a monumental drop from the 44 per cent who said Harper deserved to be re-elected just before the robocalls-tainted 2011 federal election.
Second, 44% of Canadians still believe Harper is shepherding Canada in the right direction. The good thing is that the figure represents an unstoppable decline since 2008. According to the poll:

  • In 2008, 55 per cent thought that Canada was on the right track, but the Conservatives only returned with a minority government.
  • In early 2011, 51 per cent of Canadians thought the country was on the right track. Harper and the Conservatives returned to Ottawa with a majority government.
As usual, the corporate media has tried to put a positive spin on the poll results. CTV News headlined its report on the poll: CTV poll: 30 per cent of Canadians think Harper gov’t should be re-elected. And then, in the first paragraph, made it clear they believe that “the Conservatives appear to have weathered most of the Senate scandal storm and put a halt to their declining popularity…”
To conclude: the “big numbers” for the Conservatives are all about the advantages of incumbency. Nothing else. Change is coming to Canada in 2015.




-------


Impeach the bazzturd?

Why not bring on the lynching party?
 
gopher

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Re: Quit picking on harper

gerryh said:
Impeach? I think you should stick to american politics because you don't have a fu cking clue about Canadian.
Click to expand...



I'll admit I don't know nor do I want to know shït about Canuckleheaded politics.

But from the comments made by these wannabes it is only too obvious that they know less about American politics than I know about yours. The repeated horseshït claims are obviously designed to keep attention away from Harper. And I bring that out, it brings responses such as yours or deflections from Walter.

Obviously, I have struck a nerve which means that what I said was the truth.

You know what they say - what goes around, comes around. Now it's time to give Harper the same shït the Wannabes have given Obama.
 
gerryh

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Re: Quit picking on harper

gopher said:
I'll admit I don't know nor do I want to know shït about Canuckleheaded politics.

But from the comments made by these wannabes it is only too obvious that they know less about American politics than I know about yours. The repeated horseshït claims are obviously designed to keep attention away from Harper. And I bring that out, it brings responses such as yours or deflections from Walter.

Obviously, I have struck a nerve which means that what I said was the truth.

You know what they say - what goes around, comes around. Now it's time to give Harper the same shït the Wannabes have given Obama.
Click to expand...


Glad to see you admit that you know squat about what you are talking about. This post just extends that even further when you lump me in with Walter with the assumption that I support Harper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom