Promise Made Promise Kept

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
Like most people, I find it unnerving when suddenly everyone in the room is talking about a subject I can’t even begin to understand. When it happens to me, and it happens a lot, it usually involves math, a subject that ceased to make any sense to me about halfway through grade eight.

So this past week when suddenly out of the blue the Harper government put a bullet into Canada’s income trusts and all the seniors went crazy, I was kind of lost.

It was pretty exciting stuff, though. Angry seniors on the front page threatening to take down the Tories, angry oil patch executives on the business page threatening to take down the Tories. I can only imagine how the seniors who moonlight on weekends as oil executives are feeling.

And as I perused the papers trying to figure out what the hell an income trust was, I realized that everything I knew about income trusts I learned in the last election, and I learned from Stephen Harper. It was from Stephen Harper that I learned that it’s seniors more than any group in Canada that invest in income trusts.

And I heard Stephen Harper tell us over and over again that when he became Prime Minister income trusts would be safe. It was a promise he made directly to Canada’s senior citizens.

Politicians love to make promises directly to seniors because they know seniors deserve a society’s respect, plus seniors have nothing to do all day so they actually vote. Election day and a slice of lemon meringue is a big day out for the blue rinse set.

So when Harper made this promise, I believed him. And so did a lot of seniors, apparently, because they kept investing in the bloody things. And why not? Harper’s entire shtick is that you can believe what he says. The entire raison d’être of the Harper government is: you may not like what we do, but we do what we say. Those Tories give you a promise, you can take it to the bank.

In fact if you go to a Harper rally, you can’t hear yourself think for all the Tories chanting “promise made, promise kept” over and over again like a herd of demented Moonies. Some of them get so excited they smack themselves in the forehead over and over again while they chant it. During the last election Jason Kenney was forced to apply liberal amounts of pancake makeup above his eyebrows to hide the bruising.

Well thank God that’s over. Because the next time Stephen Harper or any of his minions chant “promise made, promise kept,” you might want to step back, because if there is a God, the forecast calls for lightning.

That’s the chance you take when you mess with senior citizens and their hard-earned savings.

And yes, I know Harper has all sorts of excuses why he had to break his promise to seniors, but you know what? I don’t really care — because years ago I came to the conclusion that there were only two real reasons why politicians break their promises: You already voted for them and you already voted for them.

And it turns out some things never change.


Rick Mercer
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
It should be noted that in the past it has been seniors who predominantly used income trusts, but since 2000 they have been becoming a more enticing option for big businesses. The trend was alarming, if all the corporations followed the direction that Bell and other large corporations were headed, the tax burden on ordinary citizens would have been immense. Think of the value there is in our stock market, and then think about how much money our Government would lose once there wasn't taxes rolling in from these corporations. If they want to protect our tax base, as well as the earning potential of seniors, perhaps they should extend the tax schedule that income to retirement type funds only.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
I can't pretend I know what income trusts are about, despite reading assiduously about them in the Toronto Globe & Mail for the last few weeks. What they seem to me to be is a way for corporations to dodge taxes by passing their income on to investors through some accounting trick, so the money becomes taxable in the investors' hands, not the corporations' hands, and because it's not wage income it's taxed at a much lower rate, with significant revenue losses to government, so the government took steps to get its revenue back. I'm inclined to think that despite promises made during the last federal election campaign, the government was right to do so, and the promises were made in ignorance of what was really going on. I've never been a right winger, but the current federal government seems to me to be at least trying to be honest and up front, which is more than I can say for any recent LIberal government, and I'm prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt, at least for a little longer. Maybe a lot longer: the Liberals seem to be in a state of total disarray similar to what the political right was in until recently, which was really all that enabled that rotten Chretien to stay on as PM for as long as he did. If there'd been a credible alternative, he'd have been kicked out the door years before he finally left.


But I can afford to think that way. I'm retired, with a secure pension no government but a communist one could interfere with without causing a revolution. And I'd be on the front line with my .303... Who was it who said nobody's liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Who was it who said nobody's liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session?

Gideon J. Tucker.

I thought it was Daniel Webster, actually. Then I looked it up.

Who the Hell is Gideon J. Tucker?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Here we are

[SIZE=-1]NUMBER:[/SIZE]1041[SIZE=-1]AUTHOR:[/SIZE]Saying[SIZE=-1]QUOTATION:[/SIZE]No man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the Legislature is in session.[SIZE=-1]ATTRIBUTION:[/SIZE]Saying quoted by Gideon J. Tucker, Surrogate, in 1866 report of the final accounting in the estate of A. B.—New York Surrogate Reports, 1 Tucker (N. Y. Surr.) 249 (1866).[SIZE=-1]SUBJECTS:[/SIZE]Legislature

http://www.bartleby.com/73/1041.html