Premier Brad Wall criticized on climate science stance

[Locutus]

derp

so you got nothing. Lol

 

[mentalfloss]

The China-U.S. Climate Agreement: By the Numbers | World Resources Institute

 

[pgs]

We've already been affecting the climate.

And there's no cash grab if the carbon pricing model is revenue neutral.

And we have been for 4 million years . What is your point ? Beavers change the climate also , do you know this and how ?

 

[pgs]

And we have been for 4 million years . What is your point ? Beavers change the climate also , do you know this and how ?

I guess that your lack of response means no beaver tax coming soon , EH ?

 

[DaSleeper]

We've already been affecting the climate.

And there's no cash grab if the carbon pricing model is revenue neutral.

Your idea of revenue neutral is the old socialist ideal of take from Peter to give to Paul.....
For you....that's O K....


Unless you are Peter....

 

[coldstream]

The skepticism over the psuedo science of AGW, a contrived, incoherent jumble of models, selective evidence, continually revised predictions and theoretical mechanisms.. all without an iota of scientific credibility... is in fact widespread. Politicians fear to voice it because a bunch of ignorant envirofascists will produce a 'petition' to prove their case.. and go paroxysms of fear mongering and hysteria.

It will never change the truth of Climate Change.. it is pure bogus science.. a theory working backwards from a predetermined result and in support of a political and philosophical agenda.

It is manifestation of the relativism, skepticism, irrationality and neopaganism which now dominates Western thought, propelled by deep pessimism and antipathy to the human cause. The supposed solution to this favricated crisis will be utterly devastating to the world's economy and populations.. exactly as the environazis intended... whose mad vision is of pristine, deindustrialized eco utopia.. that can support perhaps 5 or 10% of the world's current population.

 

[IdRatherBeSkiing]

Yes, we've increased global average temperatures by a significant amount and carbon tax revenues are documented as well as offsetting tax reductions.

What offsetting tax reductions? Somebody should tell Wynn about them -- she appears to have forgotten.

 

[Walter]

The skepticism over the psuedo science of AGW, a contrived, incoherent jumble of models, selective evidence, continually revised predictions and theoretical mechanisms.. all without an iota of scientific credibility... is in fact widespread. Politicians, with no balls or spine, fear to voice it because a bunch of ignorant envirofascists will produce a 'petition' to prove their case.. and go paroxysms of fear mongering and hysteria.

fify