It's not chaff. It's wreckage from the plane falling from the sky after it was hit by a missile. If it is chaff, it's chaff from the 1970s. Plus, why would a fighter plane deploy chaff against an unarmed airliner?
'It looks like it may be a terrible tragedy': Obama goes AWOL again with just 40-second mention of Malaysian plane crash feared to have killed Americans before his jokey 16-minute transport speech
In today's Daily Mail, Clark S. Judge, a former adviser to President Reagan, has called Obama a "weak and timid President who talks big and does nothing."
This is a far cry from the leading roll that Britain and Australia are playing in the aftermath of this tragedy, whose Prime Ministers, Cameron and Abbott (it has been revealed that Abbott's daughters flew on MH17 just a few weeks ago), are leading the calls for action to be taken against Putin's Russia.
Just days before this tragedy, Cameron performed a major reshuffle of his Cabinet, with the PM choosing, amongst other things, a new Defence Secretary (Michael Fallon) and new Foreign Secretary (Phillip Hammond). Just days into their new jobs, the new Cabinet already has a lot on its plate.
Britain is probably the most hawkish of all the European countries towards Russia, with much of continental Europe - including Germany - too scared to act against the Russians as Russia provides them with a lot of gas.
This weak and timid President talks big... and does nothing: A devastating attack on Obama by a top Washington insider
Clark S. Judge believes Obama's reaction to the tragedy was 'disconnected'
Immediately 'reverted to script' to praise his administration
Former adviser to Ronald Reagan says it confirms 'chaos' of foreign policy
By Clark S. Judge, former adviser to President Reagan
20 July 2014
Daily Mail
At a political event in Wilmington, Delaware, on Thursday, President Obama devoted only 40 seconds to the shooting down of the Malaysian airline, his first statement to the world following the news.
His emotionless reference to the attack as ‘a terrible tragedy’ seemed disconnected from the horrific moment, particularly as he immediately reverted to script to praise his administration and criticise Republicans.
It was a far cry from President Reagan’s 1983 fierce denunciation of the Soviet shooting down of a Korean airliner as a ‘crime against humanity’.
Response: President Obama's emotionless reference to the attack as ‘a terrible tragedy’ seemed disconnected from the horrific moment
But it only confirmed the chaos into which US foreign policy has descended since the summer of 2012 when reporters at a White House briefing asked Mr Obama about the security of chemical weapons in the Syrian stockpile.
The commander in chief went beyond safety and said: ‘We have been very clear to the Assad regime … that a red line for us is [when] we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilised.’
The term ‘red line’ is the kind of clear, emphatic language major powers use only when they are prepared to back words with action.
A little over a year later, the Assad regime utilised chemical weapons against its own people.
The number of blunders that the President and his administration committed in the ‘red line’ affair is hard to fathom.
Before the President spoke, no one vetted the term and its consequences in the White House policy process and, once the words came out, no one undertook preparations in case Syrian president Bashar al-Assad called Mr Obama’s bluff.
According to reports, no one made the diplomatic rounds to line up the support of allies just in case, or the congressional rounds to line up the support of Congress. No one developed military plans or sent quiet signals to Assad that the US was not to be trifled with on this matter.
These actions are routine when any White House makes as definitive a commitment as the President made, except, apparently, this White House.
Even bigger blunders came after the Syrian chemical attack. Mr Obama began signalling that, despite his remark, he did not want a response, any response. First there was the verification charade. Multiple eyewitness accounts of rockets rising out of Syrian army installations and falling into the stricken zones at the time of the chemical attacks were not enough to warrant quick action.
Then there was his call for a congressional vote, delivered just when the need to respond was most urgent if air strikes were to deliver an effective message.
Back to politics: He immediately reverted to script to praise his administration and criticise Republicans
Finally, there was the utter failure to attract congressional support, assuming Mr Obama really wanted Congress to endorse the proposed attacks.
That the Parliament of our closest ally, Great Britain, rejected an air campaign first gave Mr Obama an additional reason for inactivity. The flailing seemed to end when Russian President Vladimir Putin opened the door to a negotiated deal with Syria. But it was not the end; it was the beginning.
For as the administration rushed to that door, all over the world those who depended on America when in harrowing circumstances were asking themselves: How reliable is America now? How strong now?
Also asking was Mr Putin. He noted the contrast between Mr Obama’s bold talk and timid response. As the former head of a friendly government said in a small meeting I attended not long ago: ‘Putin is cautious. He will probe. If he encounters resistance, he will pull back.’
The US failure to follow through in Syria gave the Russian president confidence that he could move with impunity.
SOON he was picking a fight with Ukraine. Like the scene in The Godfather – when, at his child’s baptism, Michael Corleone renounces the devil as the camera cuts back and forth to his men eliminating rival gangsters – Putin, before global television cameras, watched the opening ceremonies of the Sochi Olympics as Russian troops began movements preparatory to seizing Crimea.
This week, in the skies over Ukraine, we saw the consequences of the recklessness that the Russian godfather’s probing has unleashed.
Putin was not the only one to detect opportunity in American indecision. China stepped up its probes in the East and South China Seas. In the Middle East, with the US military presence drawn down nearly to zero in Iraq and soon Afghanistan, an army of ruthless fanatics gestating unnoticed in Syria’s east saw the chance to break out of national boundaries and within a few weeks occupied much of western and central Iraq.
Why has so much of the global order come apart so fast?
For the same reason that, as a friend reports, on the streets of San Salvador those who will smuggle your child to the Rio Grande have been securing an unprecedented volume of sign-ups. When asked about the chances of the child staying in America once the border is crossed, they tell parents: ‘It has never been easier.’
Now the word on weakness is everywhere, even the poorest barrios of Central America.
Consequences: The current White House doesn’t understand how US f ecklessness in Syria can reverberate to Ukraine
‘The fact that you have a crisis in Ukraine has nothing to do with Gaza,’ a deputy national security adviser to the President told an interviewer recently.
The current White House doesn’t understand how US f ecklessness in Syria can reverberate to Ukraine, and from there to the South China Sea, and the Americas, and Gaza and elsewhere in the Middle East.
In all this I have referred to the United States as the primary shaper of world events, which is, in fact, a misleading shorthand.
The US is not a superpower so much as the biggest player in a set of super-alliances, the most critical of which is with the UK.
Since the Second World War, when the US and Britain have been of one mind, liberal values have been secure and even advanced. When either has lost its sense of direction, neither has been nearly so effective.
The great danger in being the anchor to the global order is that when we lose our way the general peace itself is threatened.
This is just what we are seeing in theatre after theatre around the world. Perhaps it is time for a key ally like Prime Minister David Cameron to have a friendly talk with the President.
It is not just American interests that a flailing White House threatens. It is that of peoples everywhere.
Journalists have chronicled the carnage that greeted rescuers when they reached the wreck of MH17, with crumpled corpses and body parts strewn amid the smouldering wreckage...
Corpses and body parts strewn amid MH17 wreckage greet first arrivals at Ukraine crash scene
Horrendous scenes in eastern Ukraine field where Malaysian Airlines flight crashed to earth are encountered by local villagers, rescue workers and militiamen as they reach the scene
By
Philip Sherwell, New York
18 Jul 2014
The Telegraph
Scenes of near-unspeakable horror, with crumpled corpses and body parts strewn amid the smouldering wreckage, greeted local villagers and pro-Russian rebels who were first on the scene of the crash.
Journalists covering the separatist uprising in eastern Ukraine chronicled the gruesome carnage with searing eyewitness reports from the wheat field where flight MH17 smashed to earth, with no survivors from the 295 on board.
"A woman in a black sweater top lay on her back, blood streaming from her face, her left arm raised as if signalling someone," wrote Sabrine Tavernise, a New York Times correspondent.
"Another victim, naked except for a black bra, lay on the field, her grey hair mixing with the green grasses, one leg broken and her body torn.
Operation: Rescue forces have started to retrieve and remove bodies of passengers from the crash site of MH17
Crash site: Ukrainian rescue workers have been allowed into the site to start collecting bodies of the victims
"A young boy, who looked to be around 10 years old, lay on his side in a red T-shirt that read 'Don't Panic'." Rescue workers from the local militia forces tied pieces of white cloth on tree branches as near to the scene as they could as approximate markers of where bodies were found.
A travel guide to the Indonesian islands of Bali and Lombok, its pages intact, was a simple reminder that many of the passengers were heading off on holiday to Asia. Passports gathered together by the rescue workers.
"Many of the victims were still in their seat belts and attached to pieces of the plane," Ms Tavernise continued. "One man, still in his socks, but without pants [trousers], lay akimbo on the field, his right arm placed on his stomach, as if in repose.
"A young man in blue shorts, wearing red Nike sneakers, lay with his arms and legs splayed outward, clutching his iPhone." Locals told Noah Sneider a freelance American journalist, that at first they thought they were being bombed as the plane tore apart above the ground, raining wreckage, bodies and personal possessions along a debris path cut across the rural area.
"Bodies everywhere, organs splayed out," he wrote on the social media site Twitter. "Too gruesome to post photographs. This is an absolute disaster. Everything burnt out. Impossible to comprehend."
One local rebel fighter told him: "I've never seen anything like it. You look down and see ears, fingers, bones."
A rescue worker, who would give only his first name, Alexei, told The New York Times that wreckage was scattered across a crash zone of about four to six square miles.
"It fell down in pieces," he said Rescue workers, who numbered about 60, set up tents to gather the dead and the road past the field was lined with fire engines and other emergency vehicles.
Parts of the aircraft, including a tail fin clearly displaying the red and blue colours of Malaysian Airlines, were strewn across the road and field.
"Dogs barked in the distance and the air was filled with a bitter smell," wrote Ms Tavernise. "As dark descended on the field ... a light rain began to fall, casting a funereal pall over a scene of almost unspeakable horror."
Authorities are focussing on moving bodies to the morgue in Donetsk, leaving belongings behind
Bodies and body parts are still strapped to seats as reinforcements are called in to help with the identification process
Victims: Ukrainian officials chose to line the bodies up at the side of the crash site before removing them today
Scene: The officials took photos of fallen debris, including a Apple Mac laptop left virtually intact
Corpses and body parts strewn amid MH17 wreckage greet first arrivals at Ukraine crash scene - Telegraph
*************************************************
One strange aspect of this tragedy is the fact that so many of the corpses were completely, or almost completely, naked.
This is a phenomenon which occurred during the Lockerbie disaster in 1988, Britain's worst-ever terrorist attack, in which 259 people onboard Pan Am 103, and 11 people on the ground, were killed when the plane exploded over the town of Lockerbie (I remember, as a young boy, being in the car with my brother and parents and seeing the the wreckage of the plane lying by the side of the motorway).
The MH17 crash site photos had so many dead bodies that were naked (semi or full). What is the reason their clothes are pulled off?
It's highly suggestive that the aircraft came apart very suddenly at high speed. I take a certain measure of professional comfort in that, because the forces needed to cause that kind of virtually instantaneous destruction -- in effect, the airplane pulling itself apart due to the damage inflicted on it -- would have been violent enough to almost certainly incapacitate the majority of those aboard before they could have had any idea what was happening.
After the initial disintegration took place, the occupants thrown out of the fuselage without parachutes would have fallen through the air between 120 and 180 miles per hour, which would be enough to rip off some loose articles of clothing.
In contrast, there are accounts from the scene of people who almost look as if they are simply sleeping. If protected from much of the wind blast and restrained in their seats, they could have been incapactitated by the break-up, and then simply fallen to die at impact.
There's a famous picture from many years ago of a young New York woman who committed suicide by jumping off a skyscraper, crashing down to cave in the roof of a car. Apart from missing a shoe, she looks totally at repose.
Again, I hope and pray nobody knew what was happening, but a few probably did. Maybe somebody will be honorable enough to admit guilt and complicity in this act, but I doubt it.
The MH17 crash site photos had so many dead bodies that were naked (semi or full). What is the reason their clothes are pulled off? - Quora