You should watch Zeitgest a couple dozen more times, seems to be where you get most of your stale material from.
Pentagon Struck By Missile To Excuse Missing Plane
- Thread starter quandary121
- Start date
You should watch Zeitgest a couple dozen more times, seems to be where you get most of your stale material from.
It's one thing to allege the government organized the crashing of planes into these buildings but to complicate it further by alleging they did a little headfake and sent them off to an airport to kill the passengers is completely whacked. It would be completely impossible to cover that up for more than about 45 minutes.
Oh, this head's not buried. It's wise enough to know that if a perpetrator reveals himself as the person behind it all, the master planner, the guy who set, wired and detonated the charges, and showed us the comic book from which the deed was formulated, he'd be dismissed as a crackpot and the story as poppycock.
There was very likely a lot going on behind the scenes, but we're not going to hear about it or believe it if we did because it will boil down to be too simple to fit anyone's elaborate theory or pet proposal. I choose to devote my energies into living the rest of my life and saving the tall tales for the grandkids and the BS for the books.
err excuse me how many planes were protecting America at the time ...??? i will remind you 4 the rest were to my recollection sent off out over the sea in the opposite direction were they not on special maneuvers who was the commander of Norad at the time ...???what did he do i will tell you ok
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a846noradnotified
What that was the biggest pile of crap ive ever seen pal your wrong ,and you don't have an argument so you resort to sarcasm , fade away little man fade away :angryfire:
You are a broken record, little man. You do have a big imagination though, I'll give you credit for that.
I'm not talking about fighter jets, meat head. Norad does radar monitoring, where did your fantasy-exection plane go?
Thats a fair point i myself would rather the perpetrators of this were hung, but that's just me , i cant ignore this, as if it can happen once ,then it could happen again, and to me the cost is too high ,thanks for your input though its always refreshing to see how others view what happened even if they are complacent :-?
if im such a broken record as you say why come here and play it then, if you don't have doubts your self about WHY THIS HAPPENED .??? then what are you doing here..
are you looking for a medal for your efforts, or maybe you got a promotion for being a good little sheep ,i care not your a mug ,without an argument ,its easy to sit on the other side poking fun, the hard part is what im doing pal and you my friend aint got the balls for that poke away i will show you what its like to be a hero pal
......will this EVER END?
......besides who cares?
......what is done is done
......the truth will never come out
IMPHO.....a mega waste of time like any other cover up!
OH your back poke poke i see you want answers ,ok
[SIZE=-1]5,829 for airports near The Pentagon, Washington, DC[/SIZE]
take your pick
New evidence is coming out day by day, more questions are being asked and answers are wanted ,and no it will not until the truth be known, we the people are not going to wait for 40 years until the secrets are allowed to be told ,we want answers and we want then NOW. AND I PERSONAL WILL KEEP THIS TOPIC ALIVE UNTIL THE TRUTH IS KNOWN TO ALL..:lol::lol::lol:
Coincidences in Service of Incompetence
Many decisions and events in the days and months preceding the attack helped to make the incompetence theory more plausible.
Despite the worst failure in history of the military to protect American civilians, and the worst alleged engineering failures in history, there were no consequences for the responsible authorities, and no honest investigations.
Many decisions and events in the days and months preceding the attack helped to make the incompetence theory more plausible.
- War Games
Several war game exercises were being conducted on 9/11/01.- Operation Northern Vigilance redeployed northeast sector air defense resources to northern Canada and Alaska. [SIZE=-1]14 [/SIZE]
- Operations Vigilant Warrior and Vigilant Guardian, which simulated hijackings and involved live radar "injects," may have confused military and civilian personnel monitoring aircraft. [SIZE=-1]15 [/SIZE]
- The National Reconnaissance Office, which monitors satellites and airborne objects, was evacuated while the attack unfolded because it was conducting a plane-into-tower crash drill. [SIZE=-1]16 [/SIZE]
- The Tripod II biowarfare exercise, scheduled for 9/12/01, resulted in the deployment of FEMA to Manhattan before the attack. [SIZE=-1]17 [/SIZE]
- Rules Changes
Procedural changes would limit the ability of pilots and military commanders to respond to hijackings.- Military orders stripped commanders in the field of autonomy in responding to hijackings.
- The FAA banned firearm possession by commercial pilots two months before the attack.
- Out to Lunch
Top officials were not available until after the attack was over.- President George W. Bush remained at the publicized location of Booker Elementary School until about a half-hour after the news of the attack went on TV worldwide, first reading My Pet Goat to second-graders, and then holding a press conference.
- Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff allegedly remained in a meeting with Senator Max Cleland until nearly the time the Pentagon was hit.
- Brigadier General Montague Winfield had Navy Captain Charles J. Leidig, Jr. -- a rookie -- assume his watch as Deputy Director for Operations for the National Military Command Center (NMCC) at 8:30 am on 9/11/01, and relieved him after the attack was over. [SIZE=-1]18 [/SIZE]
Despite the worst failure in history of the military to protect American civilians, and the worst alleged engineering failures in history, there were no consequences for the responsible authorities, and no honest investigations.
- Air Defense Failures
No one was held to account for the numerous unprecedented failures in air defense.- General Richard Myers, Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on September 11th, was confirmed as Chairman on September 13th in spite of being unable to provide any meaningful answers to questions regarding the air defense failures.
- General Richard Eberhart, commander of NORAD on September 11th, was promoted to head the newly created NORTHCOM. [SIZE=-1]19 [/SIZE]
- NORAD's press release contradicted early statements by high-ranking officials that no interceptors had been scrambled on 9/11/01.
- NORAD's vague timeline raises far more questions than it answers, yet officials have never been required to give a full account.
- The 9/11 Commission advanced a new timeline which contradicts NORAD's earlier timeline and the testimony of military officials to the commission itself.
This will go the way of the JFK situation. The layering is starting and you can dig all you want. 'Roos are very practiced and adept at this.
What do you mean.. i can still see it..!
if you want i could change it...?
As I'm getting bored of it personally...:lol:
Believe your own eyes
By this point in time, most people who've bothered to really look into the 9/11 story realize:
1. There is something seriously amiss and still unexplained about the late afternoon collapse of World Trade Center Seven on 9/11.
2. The "crash of United 93" in Pennsylvania left an awfully small hole on the ground and no visible wreckage - or bodies!
3. The wreckage at the Pentagon is in no way consistent with the crash of a large jet passenger plane. Not only that but also on the day of impact, all the local security camera video was seized and has been kept from public view ever since.
Now, get ready for a real shocker, one that will require you to really stretch your mind on the subjects of perception, propaganda and evil.
Here it is:
The evidence is overwhelming that no jetliners hit the Twin Towers.
No plane in Pennsylvania. No plane at the Pentagon. And no planes in New York either.
I know this sounds crazy, but stick with it for a moment.
How do we know there were no planes in New York?
We know because the supposedly "live" footage of planes hitting the World Trade Center turns out upon careful examination to have been manipulated in very obvious ways.
If the scope of this deception seems beyond comprehension, the logistics needed to pull it off were really quite simple.
Here's what you need to know to understand how this deception was accomplished.
1. The "news" flows from a small handful of major networks. If they say it, it's true. If they show video that shows it happened, it happened. Period.
2. Each of the major news networks has a single person who completely controls what it shown on their air. He's called the news director.
3. The news director calls all the shots in a TV newsroom.
He controls what footage will be shown, what scripts will be read by the news anchor, and when a live feed will be shown - and when it will be cut off.
4. To completely control the reporting of any major event, all you need to do is control a small handful of news directors.
If the news director doesn't like the way an anchorperson is ad libbing, he can tell him or her through their earpiece to change the subject.
If the news director doesn't like what a real eyewitness is saying in a live feed, he can order the scene to be cut away to something else.
If the news director wants a certain piece of footage shown, all he has to do is hand it to one of the tech people and it will be shown, no questions asked, no debate, no analysis.
5. In order to pull off this massive fraud, the conspirators needed only three things:
FIRST: The ability to quickly alter video footage, specifically add the moving image of a plane to existing footage.
This is so easy to do it's laughable.
SECOND: A news director to receive the doctored tape, hand it to a video tech, and say "play this when you get the cue."
THIRD: A FEW rehearsed eye witnesses in place ready to jump in front of the news cameras on the scene and say they "witnessed" something that never happened.
This last part is EASY, especially when you realize that it's the news director who tells the reporter on the scene who to interview and who to ignore.
The news director does this remotely from the control room back at the studio. He can see what the on-the-scene camera is shooting and directs the on-the-scene reporter long before anything ever hits the air.
A cast of thousands, hundreds or even dozens was not needed to to pull off this media deception.
All that was needed were the news directors at the top networks to do what they were told, a few actors at the scene to play at being eye witnesses, and a dime-a-dozen video editor to re-work the "live" footage so that it shows "reality" the way the conspirators wanted it to be shown.
With a system like this in place, you can have hundreds of millions of people saying they "saw" something that never actually happened, thereby drowning out the real eye witnesses who were at the scene and were crystal clear about what they saw, specifically no planes, just explosions....coming from the inside of the buildings.
Look at the footage again. The fireball could have easily been created by explosives inside the building to which the video artifact of a plane was added later.
Note:
This video is only ONE study of one of MANY manufactured video clips purportedly "shot" that day. In fact, every "plane hits building" video I've studied displays similar or even more egregious technical problems than the one in this example.
In one case, the plane is completely black...even though a jet liner on a bright, sunny day is anything but.
In another case, the nose of a plane falls off as it is heading towards a building and then spontaneously reassembles itself. This is a kind of pixelation error that can only happen in an edit program not in a camera.
In yet another case, a plane seamlessly slips into one of the buildings without colliding into or experiencing resistance of any kind. A physical impossibility.
Still another piece of manufactured footage shows a plane colliding into one side of the North Tower building and then emerging out of one of the corners of the South Tower.
Finally, and this one is my favorite, "a plane" slices completely through one of the buildings and the nose comes out the other side completely intact, another physical impossibility.
Interestingly, many of these "fixed films" were only shown once "as is" and when shown again, the networks conveniently placed their logo banners right over the video manipulation errors.
How do we know all this?
Because we can see it with our own eyes.
And you can see it with your own eyes too.
In practical terms, what does it mean that the planes crashing into the World Trace Center were generated by bad special effects editing?
At the end of the day, it's just another nail in the coffin of the "Osama Bin Laden did it" fairy tale and proof that 9/11 was an inside job.
Buildings did impossible things on 9/11. So did pilots and the US air defense system not to mention the "hijackers" who operated with historically unprecedented tactical effectiveness that day.
Will your friends ever "get" that the 9/11 World Trade Center footage was doctored?
Possibly not.
But it doesn't matter.
You know and every day more people find out the truth, even in the face of a total media blackout and an ongoing misinformation campaign.
9/ll was an inside job. The current government of the United States is not only illegitimate, it's profoundly criminal.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/401.html
South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rh7cKDXnS_s
By this point in time, most people who've bothered to really look into the 9/11 story realize:
1. There is something seriously amiss and still unexplained about the late afternoon collapse of World Trade Center Seven on 9/11.
2. The "crash of United 93" in Pennsylvania left an awfully small hole on the ground and no visible wreckage - or bodies!
3. The wreckage at the Pentagon is in no way consistent with the crash of a large jet passenger plane. Not only that but also on the day of impact, all the local security camera video was seized and has been kept from public view ever since.
Now, get ready for a real shocker, one that will require you to really stretch your mind on the subjects of perception, propaganda and evil.
Here it is:
The evidence is overwhelming that no jetliners hit the Twin Towers.
No plane in Pennsylvania. No plane at the Pentagon. And no planes in New York either.
I know this sounds crazy, but stick with it for a moment.
How do we know there were no planes in New York?
We know because the supposedly "live" footage of planes hitting the World Trade Center turns out upon careful examination to have been manipulated in very obvious ways.
If the scope of this deception seems beyond comprehension, the logistics needed to pull it off were really quite simple.
Here's what you need to know to understand how this deception was accomplished.
1. The "news" flows from a small handful of major networks. If they say it, it's true. If they show video that shows it happened, it happened. Period.
2. Each of the major news networks has a single person who completely controls what it shown on their air. He's called the news director.
3. The news director calls all the shots in a TV newsroom.
He controls what footage will be shown, what scripts will be read by the news anchor, and when a live feed will be shown - and when it will be cut off.
4. To completely control the reporting of any major event, all you need to do is control a small handful of news directors.
If the news director doesn't like the way an anchorperson is ad libbing, he can tell him or her through their earpiece to change the subject.
If the news director doesn't like what a real eyewitness is saying in a live feed, he can order the scene to be cut away to something else.
If the news director wants a certain piece of footage shown, all he has to do is hand it to one of the tech people and it will be shown, no questions asked, no debate, no analysis.
5. In order to pull off this massive fraud, the conspirators needed only three things:
FIRST: The ability to quickly alter video footage, specifically add the moving image of a plane to existing footage.
This is so easy to do it's laughable.
SECOND: A news director to receive the doctored tape, hand it to a video tech, and say "play this when you get the cue."
THIRD: A FEW rehearsed eye witnesses in place ready to jump in front of the news cameras on the scene and say they "witnessed" something that never happened.
This last part is EASY, especially when you realize that it's the news director who tells the reporter on the scene who to interview and who to ignore.
The news director does this remotely from the control room back at the studio. He can see what the on-the-scene camera is shooting and directs the on-the-scene reporter long before anything ever hits the air.
A cast of thousands, hundreds or even dozens was not needed to to pull off this media deception.
All that was needed were the news directors at the top networks to do what they were told, a few actors at the scene to play at being eye witnesses, and a dime-a-dozen video editor to re-work the "live" footage so that it shows "reality" the way the conspirators wanted it to be shown.
With a system like this in place, you can have hundreds of millions of people saying they "saw" something that never actually happened, thereby drowning out the real eye witnesses who were at the scene and were crystal clear about what they saw, specifically no planes, just explosions....coming from the inside of the buildings.
Look at the footage again. The fireball could have easily been created by explosives inside the building to which the video artifact of a plane was added later.
Note:
This video is only ONE study of one of MANY manufactured video clips purportedly "shot" that day. In fact, every "plane hits building" video I've studied displays similar or even more egregious technical problems than the one in this example.
In one case, the plane is completely black...even though a jet liner on a bright, sunny day is anything but.
In another case, the nose of a plane falls off as it is heading towards a building and then spontaneously reassembles itself. This is a kind of pixelation error that can only happen in an edit program not in a camera.
In yet another case, a plane seamlessly slips into one of the buildings without colliding into or experiencing resistance of any kind. A physical impossibility.
Still another piece of manufactured footage shows a plane colliding into one side of the North Tower building and then emerging out of one of the corners of the South Tower.
Finally, and this one is my favorite, "a plane" slices completely through one of the buildings and the nose comes out the other side completely intact, another physical impossibility.
Interestingly, many of these "fixed films" were only shown once "as is" and when shown again, the networks conveniently placed their logo banners right over the video manipulation errors.
How do we know all this?
Because we can see it with our own eyes.
And you can see it with your own eyes too.
In practical terms, what does it mean that the planes crashing into the World Trace Center were generated by bad special effects editing?
At the end of the day, it's just another nail in the coffin of the "Osama Bin Laden did it" fairy tale and proof that 9/11 was an inside job.
Buildings did impossible things on 9/11. So did pilots and the US air defense system not to mention the "hijackers" who operated with historically unprecedented tactical effectiveness that day.
Will your friends ever "get" that the 9/11 World Trade Center footage was doctored?
Possibly not.
But it doesn't matter.
You know and every day more people find out the truth, even in the face of a total media blackout and an ongoing misinformation campaign.
9/ll was an inside job. The current government of the United States is not only illegitimate, it's profoundly criminal.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/401.html
South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rh7cKDXnS_s