Outrage as hospital worker stuns TV viewers by wishing illness on Brexiters' children
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
How is that NOT wishing illness on the children of people she doesn't agree with?
"I want" is a definite expression of desire. There's really no other way to interpret it without playing mental gymnastics. Throwing in an "unfortunately" doesn't negate the meaning of what she said.
You're smarter than I look. You're right, I misread that part. I reverse my position. She is "unfortunately" a nasty piece of work.
But Brits are still retarded.
You're suggesting what she said is what she meant. Unless you've never said something that came out the way you didn't intend it, calling for blood is just silly. As somebody that favours free speech, I think those that wish to stifle it should just f#@k off and get a life. So the question is, are you in favour of free speech?
Free speech is freedom from government sanction for your speech. Social reprehension and loss of a job are not forbidden by free speech.
Unfortunately, Mrs Borg is your usual Remoaner. The Brexiteer majority are getting used to all the hatred and bile spewed at them by Mrs Borgs and smelly students and Labour MPs who are still upset that the "little people" voted to free their country from an undemocratic, corrupt superstate and its footsoldiers like Mrs Borg.
Meh, if it was a Bracist wishing that the children of Remainers would be raped to death by Muslim immigrants, Jack Cade would be all about "freedom of speech."
A psychologist? Seriously?
Dumbest pseudo-science in the world, next to economics. A Ph.D. psychologist is somebody who wasn't smart enough to get into medical school.
There's no missed intent in what she said there, Sport. "I want..." That's all you need to know about her and what she meant. If I say, "I want a nice sunny day tomorrow", there's no mistaking what I'm hoping for.
If I say, "I want the Wynned Bag to die of a heart attack real soon", there's no mistaking what I'm hoping for.
If I say, "I want the people who disagree with me politically to have kids who fall ill", there's no mistaking what I'm hoping for, it doesn't matter how many "unfortunatelys" I put in there.
This bimbo is a bitter loser who can't stand the fact that the democratic process didn't give the result she desired. The leftards in Europe have been so used to getting their way for so long that when they don't, they react very immaturely to it. You ask me if I'm in favour of free speech, yet this broad's attitude towards the democratic process is anti-free speech itself.
Of course I'm for Freedom of Speech. I'm also for understanding that with rights and freedoms come responsibilities. If you act irresponsibly with your freedoms, expect some fall-out. A health care "professional" has the same freedoms as everyone else, they also have the same responsibilities in regards to those freedoms as everyone else. If, as a health care professional you want to publicly shoot your mouth off and wish people's kids would get sick, then expect people to use their freedom of speech to call you out on your a$$holery. Expect your employer to use their freedom of expression to can your a$$.
But c'mon man, to wish illness on people's children just because of the outcome of a referendum? That's a new low, even for progtards.
Then you could just imagine the outrage. It would be the only thing reported all day on BBC News; The Guardian's column writers would have steam coming out of their ears; Remoaners would be on every TV station, shouting "See? Typical working class/Northern/Essex/white/English scum"; Parliament would hold an "emergency debate"; and the perpetrator would have been sacked by now.
Instead, everything is fairly quiet on the media front and Mrs Gob is still in her job.
Unless you're The Amazing Kreskin, you do not know her intent. As I posted earlier, I know s reasonably intelligent and well educated person that said "It's not the job of the police to enforce the law". The second those words left her lips, she regretted it and only silly people like yourself would suggest she meant exactly what she said.
Not that it's even relevant. The lady in the OP, is entitled to her opinion and it's unfortunate the the silly extremist that want to fire anybody that they disagree with aren't being told to **** off
As she should be.
Last edited:
The irony of all this is, a lot of the people who voted back in the 70's to join the EEC had 40 years to see what it got turned into and probably said "F*ck that" and voted themselves back out of it first chance they got.
The moral of the story is: don't say anything that someone with all the brains of an internet troll can twist into something else
The funny thing is, here you can write something out, analyze it, edit it, analyze it again and rewrite it numerous times before posting. Then you can edit it once you post it. Considering some of the epically stupid shyte some people have posted here, one has to wonder if they aren't even a little bit embarrassed to be critical of this woman
Why should she have regretted it? She wasn't wrong. Their job is to enforce the law.
Unless you plan on sticking a cop or two on every street corner, good luck with the prevention thing.
The phrase, "I want" is a rather definitive expression of personal desire. What you're trying to suggest is that she didn't say what she said.