Ottawa gives final approval for Rogers $26B purchase of Shaw

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,584
3,299
113
Ottawa gives final approval for Rogers $26B purchase of Shaw
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Sammy Hudes
Published Mar 31, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 4 minute read

The largest telecommunications deal in Canadian history will go forward after Rogers Communications Inc.’s $26-billion takeover of Shaw Communications Inc. received approval from Ottawa on Friday.


The green light means the deal has cleared its final regulatory hurdle just over two years after it was first announced.


But Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne took a stern tone on Friday, vowing to “be like a hawk on behalf of Canadians” to ensure compliance with the conditions he set, aimed at bolstering competition and lowering phone and internet costs.


Champagne approved the transfer of Shaw-owned Freedom Mobile’s wireless licences to Quebecor Inc.’s Videotron, which operates in Quebec and some border regions of Ontario. Rogers and Shaw agreed in June 2022 to sell Freedom Mobile to Videotron for $2.85 billion in an attempt to ease competition concerns raised by the original proposal.

Also Friday, Champagne also announced his department would not allow any further transfers of wireless spectrum until it completes a review of Canada’s spectrum transfer framework.


Rogers first announced its deal to buy Shaw in March 2021 and the closing deadline has been pushed back numerous times since then. The three companies said Friday they expected to complete the transaction by April 7.

Ottawa has secured 21 legally enforceable commitments from Rogers and Videotron to drive prices lower, Champagne said, and the conditions “should not be taken lightly.”

Those conditions include Rogers establishing a second headquarters in Calgary and adding 3,000 new jobs based in Western Canada “in the coming months” that it must maintain for at least 10 years.

The undertaking released by the government in relation to the agreement stated that Rogers must create those jobs over a period of five years and maintain them for at least 10 years following the deal’s closure.



It must also spend $5.5 billion to expand 5G coverage and additional network services, as well as a further $1 billion to connect rural, remote and Indigenous communities.

Videotron must offer plans that are at least 20 per cent lower than its competitors and spend $150 million over the next two years to upgrade Freedom Mobile’s network. It is also restricted from transferring any Freedom Mobile licences for a decade.

Telecommunications consultant Mark Goldberg said the terms outlined by the federal government make sense, calling the penalties “meaningful.”

But he noted the companies had already publicly committed to many of those conditions throughout the two-year process.

“I think this deal could have been done a year ago if the Competition Bureau hadn’t been stubborn,” Goldberg said.


In January, the Federal Court of Appeal rejected the Competition Bureau’s bid to quash the deal.

The regulator had argued that approving the merger would reduce competition and result in higher cellphone bills, poorer service and fewer options for consumers. It wanted the court to overturn a Competition Tribunal ruling in favour of the deal.

Instead, the court sided with the tribunal’s view that “there was no substantial lessening of competition” at risk.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission approved Rogers’ acquisition of Shaw’s broadcasting services in March 2022.

When asked how deal’s the conditions would be enforced, Champagne said he “would not mess with the regulator,” though he did not elaborate on what consequences regulators would be able to impose.


If Rogers breaches its conditions, it must pay up to $1 billion in damages, the minister said. Videotron would potentially be subject to $200 million in penalties if it fails to meet its commitments.

But some observers worried the conditions do not go far enough. Keldon Bester, co-founder of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project, questioned whether the penalties were sufficiently aggressive.

“The reality is that the deal shouldn’t be proceeding in the first place and so at best, this is a consolation prize,” he said.

“There’s a big incentive for both Rogers and Videotron to shirk the commitments. It creates the incentive for parties to do the math and say, ‘If we lose more money making these commitments, why bother fulfilling (them)?”’


Rogers president and CEO Tony Staffieri welcomed Friday’s news.

“We are very pleased to move forward with this transformative merger and proudly deliver on our commitments to enhance and expand network coverage, connect underserved communities, and improve access for low-income Canadians,” Staffieri said in a press release.

“Building on a shared legacy with Shaw, we will invest substantially to bring more choice, more value, and more connectivity to Canadians across the country.”

Carleton University communications professor Dwayne Winseck, director of the Canadian Media Concentration Research Project, said Champagne has created a two-tiered regulatory system.

He said the minister’s approval makes it appear as though Rogers and Videotron are governed by a set of “sidebar deals … concocted on the fly outside of the normal public law regime that sets out what the regulatory framework is.”


“Why should the minister be cobbling together a set of private agreements to help get a deal across the finish line that should have been dead on arrival? This makes the minister look like the handmaiden of capitalism as opposed to a democratic government watching out for public interests and promoting … as much competition in these markets as possible.”

Champagne told reporters that the Liberal government has “changed the game” for telecommunications companies in Canada, but promised “this is not the end of it.”

“If we don’t see prices coming down … I’ll be seeking additional power to make sure that we drive down prices and at that time, everything is on the table,” he said.

But OpenMedia, an advocacy organization that promotes internet affordability, said Champagne’s approval put “the nail in the coffin of competition in telecommunications in Canada.” It urged full-scale competition reform in Canada to avoid more mergers in the future.

“It’s hard to reconcile this week’s federal budget filled with promises of affordability measures, with such a direct assault on choice and affordability for internet connectivity,” said executive director Laura Tribe in a press release.

— With files from Nojoud Al Mallees in Ottawa.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,023
8,306
113
Washington DC
Rogers, Bell, & Telus are the big players with a combined market share in Canada of 86%.

(Then there are some smaller regional players like Sasktel that I use)
That sounds fairly healthy. 3-5 major, nationwide providers and a reasonably healthy group of regional and re-sellers appears to be the optimum, for now.

I was part of the Big Boom in telecom. In the U.S., it shook down to four majors (AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon), and a flock of regionals an re-sellers. Competition takes the place of regulation, and is much faster and more agile at responding to customer needs and desires.

Offhand, I'd say this is mere corporate maneuvering, not a big deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,801
465
83
Penticton, BC
Market share. Here in the Okanagan Valley in BC, Telus and Shaw were the major players, with a scattering of also-rans who survived by having partnerships with one of the two big guns. So, no big change in the winds here, so far. There is still enough competition between Telus and Rogers/Shaw to keep the both them honest, if that's a word you can use to describe corporate maneuvering.
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
3,684
2,202
113
One of the many problems with our shortage of suppliers is poor service outside of major metropolitan areas. Here, Bell piggybacks on Telus towers, and several others use Rogers towers. This does nothing to improve service and does not cut prices. Koodo is owned by Telus, so again on Telus towers. According to the experts, we have the most expensive cell and internet in the western world. For internet we have SHaw and Telus, and a few resellers that use one of these two systems. Or we have to use satellite, which is slow and expensive. I have to have a cell booster in the house because service is so poor.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,023
8,306
113
Washington DC
One of the many problems with our shortage of suppliers is poor service outside of major metropolitan areas. Here, Bell piggybacks on Telus towers, and several others use Rogers towers. This does nothing to improve service and does not cut prices. Koodo is owned by Telus, so again on Telus towers. According to the experts, we have the most expensive cell and internet in the western world. For internet we have SHaw and Telus, and a few resellers that use one of these two systems. Or we have to use satellite, which is slow and expensive. I have to have a cell booster in the house because service is so poor.
Well, being a real conservative and all, I'd say the solution is for private enterprise to work out. Government should get out of the way.
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
3,684
2,202
113
Well, being a real conservative and all, I'd say the solution is for private enterprise to work out. Government should get out of the way.
The problem is government. They restrict the sale of broadband. Makes it kinda hard to just go out and start a wireless company.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,584
3,299
113
Rogers finalizes $26-billion merger with Shaw after receiving government approval
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Apr 03, 2023 • 2 minute read

TORONTO — Rogers Communications Inc. has closed its $26-billion purchase of Shaw Communications Inc. after receiving final approval from Ottawa last week, bringing to an end two years of uncertainty as regulators scrutinized the deal.


“This is a momentous day for our customers, who will benefit from the latest services and network technology, and for our teams, who have worked so hard to get us here,” said Rogers CEO Tony Staffieri in a press release.


“We’re proud to bring together these two iconic companies to deliver more value, more connectivity, and more innovation for Canadians.”

Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne gave the green light to the takeover on Friday by agreeing to the transfer of Shaw-owned Freedom Mobile’s wireless licences to Quebecor Inc.’s Videotron, the final regulatory step allowing the main deal to go ahead.

Rogers and Shaw agreed in June 2022 to sell Freedom Mobile to Videotron for $2.85 billion in an attempt to ease competition concerns raised by the original proposal. Freedom’s sale was also finalized on Monday.


In approving the deal, Champagne announced 21 conditions that Rogers and Videotron must adhere to, including Rogers establishing a second headquarters in Calgary and adding 3,000 new jobs based in Western Canada.

It must also spend $5.5 billion to expand 5G coverage and additional network services, as well as a further $1 billion to connect rural, remote and Indigenous communities.

Videotron must offer plans that are at least 20 per cent lower than its competitors and spend $150 million over the next two years to upgrade Freedom Mobile’s network.

If Rogers breaches its conditions, it must pay up to $1 billion in damages. Videotron would potentially be subject to $200 million in penalties if it fails to meet its commitments.


“We are very pleased to be closing the acquisition of Freedom Mobile today, bringing its Canadian footprint as well as the expertise and experience of its employees into our fold,” said Quebecor president and CEO Pierre Karl Peladeau in a press release.

“The alliance of Freedom and Videotron will permanently transform Canada’s wireless market for the benefit of consumers and create a new competitive environment that delivers innovative products and services at better prices.”

Champagne also announced his department would not allow any further transfers of wireless spectrum until it completes a review of Canada’s spectrum transfer framework.

Rogers first announced its deal to buy Shaw in March 2021 and the closing deadline has been pushed back numerous times since then. The deal was expected to close by April 7.

“Rogers and Shaw have been connecting Canadians for more than 50 years, and we’re thrilled to come together as one company to build on a shared legacy of investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship,” said Rogers chairman Edward Rogers in a press release.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,199
9,582
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Rogers’ hiring of former industry minister Navdeep Bains — who headed the telecom file for the Liberal government until 2021 — is “incredibly concerning,” the NDP said.
“Canadians have questions – they want to ensure Rogers now has no easy access to cabinet with this hiring,” NDP innovation critic Brian Masse said in an emailed statement.

“It certainly looks like the Liberals are in the pockets of telecom giants, getting gravy jobs as their executives, instead of defending Canadians who are already paying a fortune for cell and internet bills.”

Oh well…..next….Rogers announced Thursday that Bains, who served as minister of innovation, science and industry in the current Liberal government from 2015 until January 2021, would join the company as chief corporate affairs officer. The industry minister is responsible for the telecom sector, and Rogers is one of Canada’s big three wireless providers.

In March 2021, Rogers announced it would acquire Shaw in a $26-billion merger, which closed earlier this month.

“This hiring raises questions especially after the government green-lit the Rogers-Shaw merger, benefiting Rogers at the expense of Canadian consumers,” Masse said.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,584
3,299
113
Former Liberal industry minister Navdeep Bains takes job at Rogers
Bains joined CIBC after leaving public office in 2021

Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Apr 21, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 1 minute read

OTTAWA — Former Liberal industry minister Navdeep Bains is joining Rogers as the company’s new chief corporate affairs officer.


Rogers announced several new appointments to its executive leadership team on Thursday, including Bains and a former Shaw executive.


“This is a terrific opportunity to build on my commitment to champion critical issues facing both Canada and Canadians,” Bains said in a statement.

“It’s an exciting time to join the company and to work with Tony and the team to help grow the digital economy and deliver more choice, more value and more connectivity for consumers.”

Bains served in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet as industry minister from 2015 until early 2021, and chose to not run for re-election that year.

The industry minister is responsible for overseeing the country’s national industrial strategy, including regulating national sectors such as telecommunications.


Ben Klass, a PhD candidate at Carleton University’s School of Journalism and Communications and a telecommunications researcher, said the news of Bains’s appointment evoked feelings of “disappointment” and “resignation.”

Klass testified before MPs on the House of Commons industry committee about the July 8 Rogers outage last summer, where he called for better regulation of the telecom industry.

“To see our leaders moving seamlessly between government — where they essentially represent the interests of the people — and the industry … it’s hard to overstate how disappointing that is,” Klass said.

There are no prohibitions on elected officials taking roles in the private sector after leaving office, so long as they remain compliant with the Lobbying Act.

According to the act, an elected official is not permitted to engage in lobbying activities for five years after leaving public office.

Bains joined CIBC as a vice chair of global investment banking after leaving his job as an MP.

Rogers says part of Bains’s responsibility will be to lead the company’s public policy and environmental, social and governance efforts.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Taxslave2

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
3,684
2,202
113
Yet another conflict of interest in the turdOWE government.
There needs to be a 10 year delay between when a politician or senior bureaucrat can move to a senior position with a ministry they had direct responsibility in.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,584
3,299
113
Rogers hiring of Trudeau insider is too close for comfort
Navdeep Bains will now help run a company he used to regulate and oversee the lobbying of a government he used to be part of.


Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Published Apr 24, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read
Navdeep Bains was once in charge of regulating Rogers for the Trudeau government, now he will oversee the company's lobbying efforts.

One of the newest additions to the Rogers executive suite is someone in charge of lobbying the Trudeau government, who is legally prohibited from lobbying the Trudeau government. Navdeep Bains was appointed Chief Corporate Affairs Officer at Rogers last week, but he’s legally barred from lobbying the government he was once part of for close to three years.


Bains served as Justin Trudeau’s minister of innovation, science and industry from 2015 until he resigned the post in January 2021. In that portfolio, Bains was responsible for regulating the very company he’s now an executive at.


It’s all a little cozy, perhaps too cozy, but completely unsurprising in Canadian business and political circles. In many ways, Canada, or at least the central part of this country, has never really left behind the Family Compact system that governed us 200 years ago.

Sure, the names and faces have changed, even some new families have been added – like Bains – but there is a comfortable elite that governs the rest of us as they switch roles and titles. Being invited to join is what many Canadians might consider winning the lottery.


I don’t blame Rogers for wanting to hire Bains.

He’s a smart man; he’s a pro-business Liberal, and he’s done well in every job he’s been at. My criticisms of Rogers hiring Bains have nothing to do with the man. I got to know him when he was a young opposition MP close to 20 years ago and he was impressive then.

The problem is that the man who used to regulate the nation’s wireless carriers — who promised but didn’t deliver lower bills — is now working for one of the biggest carriers. He’s also responsible for the division of the company that is responsible for lobbying the government for favourable legislation or regulations.

In other words, Bains is now responsible for getting his former cabinet colleagues to alter their views to align with those of his new employer – Rogers.


Since the Harper government brought in the Federal Accountability Act in 2006, elected officials and political staffers in positions of power have been banned from lobbying for a period of five years after they leave office. Bains won’t reach that point until 2026 which means he’s in charge of the department, but can’t actually lobby himself.


A spokesperson for Rogers said in an email this week that Bains had proactively reached out to Canada’s ethics commissioner to get clearance to join Rogers. That was obviously given but it was also at a time when the sister-in-law of Bains’ former cabinet colleague, Dominic LeBlanc, was heading up the office.

According to Rogers, Bains will not communicate with the government on behalf of the company.


“He will remain fully compliant with his obligations under the Lobbying Act,” Rogers said in a statement.

Let’s take Rogers, and Bains, at their word and assume that he won’t communicate with the government on behalf of his new employer. What about someone else calling up a minister and saying, “Francois, good to chat, Nav said I should give you a call.”

Would that have any bearing on future government decisions?

Bains is entitled to make a living after leaving politics, and any company would be smart to hire him. This hire, this position, though, seems far too comfortable, too much like the system is being rigged by those on the inside.

Hiring the former minister who regulated your company, who is close with many still in cabinet, who has the insider contacts with the bureaucracy that no one else has is simply too close for comfort.

There’s no law against this hiring, but the thing is there shouldn’t have to be one. We shouldn’t have to legislate doing the right thing.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,584
3,299
113
Bains appointment to Rogers prompts House committee to invite lobbying commissioner
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Apr 26, 2023 • 1 minute read
The House of Commons ethics committee is inviting the Lobbying Commissioner to testify on the appointment of former industry minister Navdeep Bains to an executive role at Rogers.
The House of Commons ethics committee is inviting the Lobbying Commissioner to testify on the appointment of former industry minister Navdeep Bains to an executive role at Rogers.
OTTAWA — The lobbying commissioner is being asked to appear at a House of Commons committee to explain why the appointment of a former industry minister to an executive role at Rogers doesn’t break the lobbying code.


The House of Commons ethics committee agreed Tuesday to invite the commissioner to a future meeting following a motion moved by Conservative Michael Barrett.


Former Liberal MP Navdeep Bains was the minister of industry for more than five years until he left government for the private sector in 2021.

He was among several new appointments made to Rogers executive leadership team last week after Bains cleared his new job with both the lobbying and ethics commissioners in Ottawa.

The industry minister is responsible for overseeing Canada’s industrial strategy, including regulating national sectors such as telecommunications.

The motion passed in committee on Tuesday as critics warn about the optics of the appointment.