An anology.
If I was able to create aware beings capable of decision making, I could stigmatize a class of them if only one offended me. Then I could say that they as a class "don't have my favor as they are capable of reproducing themselves", and procreating more potential nastiness. If I lean toward a more liking to a second class of beings I create, as they work closer to me and attend to my office, and to my dismay one offends me, then I could do the same to them, but then I have a problem. It would drive home the fact that possibly no classes I make are capable of my perfection.
I can't leave it at that and shrug it off, has all the beings I create can think and reason. So the ones I stigmatized can also reason. They approach me one day and bring this question to me.
Them: "Why do you stigmatize all of us, but don't stigmatize all of the other class of Spironks".
Me: "Because you are all one species of Menks, and they are all unique species."
Them: "But they are all a different species in principle that you attached their appendages and other cosmetic differences and are different from each other, but in aspects of their components that allow them to reason and make decisions they are all the same circuitry, making them one genus in the aspects of their ability to think and their substance. On that basis that is what's pertinent, and that is that they are all of the same genus in thought process. Also, the vehicle for the transmission of the sin is through persuassion and influence by both classes. This is probagation in the sense that the ability to compound evil is still possible."
The classification of angels as a species is said to be the reason that excludes them all from the stigmatization of original sin, and as we know Satan was the only rotten apple in the barrel. The point missed is that there was no factor in the species makeup that caused one to sin other than what makes them common, and so it is irrelevant. If we do some detective work and trace the source of the decision we can see it originated from a spiritual thought and process that is common to all of them, even though the rest of their makeup was different. Even if we accept the species reason, then we cannot accept it due to factors of the recipient of the temptation. If a species can influence another species, then the potential to probagate sin is still there. So in this sense the ability to probagate the sin is there, but not the capability to procreate among them of course, but that is irrelevant.
Angels should therefore be stigmatized of original sin on the bases of the genus(spirit), and in their specific commonality of their thought process, and that they can influence other species, or probagation in it's true sense.
AndyF
If I was able to create aware beings capable of decision making, I could stigmatize a class of them if only one offended me. Then I could say that they as a class "don't have my favor as they are capable of reproducing themselves", and procreating more potential nastiness. If I lean toward a more liking to a second class of beings I create, as they work closer to me and attend to my office, and to my dismay one offends me, then I could do the same to them, but then I have a problem. It would drive home the fact that possibly no classes I make are capable of my perfection.
I can't leave it at that and shrug it off, has all the beings I create can think and reason. So the ones I stigmatized can also reason. They approach me one day and bring this question to me.
Them: "Why do you stigmatize all of us, but don't stigmatize all of the other class of Spironks".
Me: "Because you are all one species of Menks, and they are all unique species."
Them: "But they are all a different species in principle that you attached their appendages and other cosmetic differences and are different from each other, but in aspects of their components that allow them to reason and make decisions they are all the same circuitry, making them one genus in the aspects of their ability to think and their substance. On that basis that is what's pertinent, and that is that they are all of the same genus in thought process. Also, the vehicle for the transmission of the sin is through persuassion and influence by both classes. This is probagation in the sense that the ability to compound evil is still possible."
The classification of angels as a species is said to be the reason that excludes them all from the stigmatization of original sin, and as we know Satan was the only rotten apple in the barrel. The point missed is that there was no factor in the species makeup that caused one to sin other than what makes them common, and so it is irrelevant. If we do some detective work and trace the source of the decision we can see it originated from a spiritual thought and process that is common to all of them, even though the rest of their makeup was different. Even if we accept the species reason, then we cannot accept it due to factors of the recipient of the temptation. If a species can influence another species, then the potential to probagate sin is still there. So in this sense the ability to probagate the sin is there, but not the capability to procreate among them of course, but that is irrelevant.
Angels should therefore be stigmatized of original sin on the bases of the genus(spirit), and in their specific commonality of their thought process, and that they can influence other species, or probagation in it's true sense.
AndyF
