"Openess! Transparency!" HA!: FOI worse under Trudeau Gov't

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Um, what is there about FOI being worse under Trudeau that's confusing you? You're blaming Harper for Trudeau making things even more difficult. Why are Trudopes so utterly clueless? Oh that's right, you're all a bunch of brainwashed neo-liberal progtards who think personal responsibility means blaming someone else.

You're confusing 'doing nothing' with 'actively making worse'.

We already know Harper was the one who made this problem just like he was the one who was Anti-Science and wouldn't take any questions from reporters.

Meanwhile, Trudeau actually holds town halls and takes questions directly from people.

You dotards have no arguments left.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Once again trying to peddle a meme instead of accepting reality.

That is umm.. How we say...

Le dotard.


Days in office 693

In progress 71 of 226 - 31.4%

Achieved 55 of 226 - 24.3%
Broken 35 of 226 - 15%

https://trudeaumetre.polimeter.org

Oh yeah.

He has marvelously passed all kinds of legislation to phuck the place up.

He just hasn't fulfilled the promises he made that actually might improve Canada.

However, the Bill C-58 (An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act) being pushed by the Trudeau government, doesn’t open up the PMO or Minister’s offices to the act, and it even gives the government more power to refuse access to information requests from the public.
As reported by the Hill Times, NDP House Leader Murray Rankin ripped the Trudeau government for their lies:
“It’s obviously a farce, and a long way from the bill that [Mr. Trudeau] introduced himself in access to information, you may remember, when he was in opposition. It’s a long way from the mandate letters, it’s a long way from all the electoral promises that they made,” said Rankin.
Conservative House Leader Candice Bergen says “We’re going to have a lot of people interested in debating it,” meaning the government will have to answer for their broken promise.

More Trudeau deception

It’s becoming clear that Trudeau was elected under false pretenses. His numerous broken promises on the deficit, taxes, access to information, and many more, shows that he has no problem lying to the Canadian people, and nothing he says can be trusted.
https://www.spencerfernando.com/201...apply-access-info-act-prime-ministers-office/

Meanwhile, Trudeau actually holds town halls and takes questions directly from people.

.

He takes them.

He just doesn't answer them.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
OTTAWA — A government bill intended to increase transparency for Canadians would actually do the opposite, the federal information watchdog said Thursday.
In a report presented to Parliament, information commissioner Suzanne Legault said the bill tabled in June, which amends the Access to Information Act, would take people’s right to know backwards rather than forward.
Legault, an ombudsman for users of the access act, has long advocated strengthening the 34-year-old law that gives people who pay a $5 application fee a right to ask for federal files ranging from expense reports to briefing papers.
The Trudeau government says its proposed access legislation will raise the bar on openness and transparency.
In her first substantive comments on the legislation, Legault said the measures fail to deliver on Liberal election promises. “If passed, it would result in a regression of existing rights.”
Under the access act, departments and agencies must answer requests within 30 days or provide a good reason why more time is necessary. Many applicants complain about lengthy delays in processing requests and blacked-out passages — or entire pages — in the records that are eventually released.
In addition, dozens of agencies with federal ties fall outside the act.
The government has not fulfilled its promise to extend the law to the offices of the prime minister, cabinet members, senators, MPs and administrative institutions that support Parliament and the courts, Legault said.
Instead, these offices and institutions would be required to regularly release certain types of records, such as hospitality and travel expenses and contract information.
Such a scheme allows government to decide what information Canadians can obtain, rather than letting requesters decide for themselves, Legault said.
The bill also backpedals on a promise to give the information commissioner genuine power to make orders about the release of records, her report said. “It does not take advantage of any of the benefits of a true order-making model.”
Legault also criticized provisions that would:

  • Impose added obligations on requesters when making a request and create new grounds for institutions to decline to act on applications;
  • Reintroduce the possibility of various processing fees that were scrapped last year.


Access to info bill a step backwards, not forward: watchdog
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Laura Stone OTTAWA
1 hour ago September 27, 2017


Canada's access-to-information system has only gotten worse under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government, and a new Liberal bill intended to fix the problems has "worrisome" elements, a new report has found.
A freedom-of-information audit from News Media Canada, a national association representing the Canadian news media industry, gives the federal government a failing grade for timely disclosure of information. It also said its performance in this year's audit "was even worse than in the latter years of the former Stephen Harper government."


"The results are not encouraging and show a system that seems as broken as ever," said a report on the audit by journalist and professor Fred Vallance-Jones and Emily Kitagawa, a freelance journalist and social worker.
Nathan Cullen, the NDP democratic reform critic, called the findings "shameful."

"It's got to be a bad day for Liberals when Stephen Harper was more open to the Canadian public than they are," he said.
The report came the same day the federal information watchdog said she is "generally very disappointed" with the Liberal bill that would revise the Access to Information Act, which is intended to let Canadians see federal files.
Information commissioner Suzanne Legault said on Tuesday she will outline her concerns about the planned changes in a special report to Parliament this week.
The act, which took effect in 1983, allows people who pay $5 to request everything from correspondence and studies to expense reports and meeting minutes.
Agencies must answer requests within 30 days or provide a good reason for taking more time.


Treasury Board President Scott Brison has acknowledged the need for modernization and he described the government bill introduced in June as the first substantial revision of the act. "These reforms are only the first phase," Mr. Brison said in the Commons last week. "It is a work in progress to strengthen access to information and openness and transparency in Canada."
The bill would also allow the information commissioner to order the release of records and require the prime minister, cabinet ministers, members of Parliament and senators to release some types of documents regularly.
Conservative and New Democrat MPs say the Liberals are backpedalling on a campaign promise to fully apply the access law to ministerial offices. They also say the bill does nothing to narrow the exemptions that allow federal agencies to keep information secret.
The media organization has done seven such audits since 2008. This year's involved mailing more than 400 requests to all three levels of government for comparison. The federal requests included everything from contracts to correspondence to information about U.S. President Donald Trump. The audit said just a quarter of requests sent to federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations were answered within 30 days. One third did not receive a response by the end of the audit period of nearly four months.
"The federal audit reveals an access system that is bogged down to the point where, in many cases, it simply doesn't work," the report said.
It also expressed concern because the Liberal bill would allow access requests to be rejected if they are "vexatious" or for so many records that they would "unreasonably interfere" with the government's work.

"One of the most worrisome of the new provisions is one allowing requests to be rejected simply because of their size or scope," the report said.
Mr. Brison has said he intends to ensure no government can abuse this provision.
With a report from the Canadian Press





https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/ne...36407309/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&

I actually know of an immigration case in 2015 in which the accused's counsel asked for the names of the anonymous police officers whose reports the Minister's counsel had presented as proof, and the Minister's counsel countered that if the defendant's counsel wanted their names, she'd need to make a request under the Access to Information Act. I thought it insane that a Minister's counsel would present a report written by Officer Anonymoose and expect it to hold water.