JonB2004 said:
So I say that Harper listens to Bush, and you wanna cry?
If you don't like this forum, leave. I hope you don't though because I have a huge crush on you.
Only 32% back PM on Mideast
- Thread starter sanch
- Start date
So I say that Harper listens to Bush, and you wanna cry?
If you don't like this forum, leave. I hope you don't though because I have a huge crush on you.
Of course Harper listens to Bush, he is the most pwerful man on earth, leader of the nation that is our closest ally, and our only neighbour. We share much history, a large portion of us have American relatives, we speak the same language, our laws spring from the same sources, we are very close to being the same people.
There is a big gulf between listening and being a puppet.
Harper is no one's puppet.
There is a big gulf between listening and being a puppet.
Harper is no one's puppet.
#juan said:
Most Canadian polls are pretty accurate in their sampling. Usually they're done with just over 1000 people selected by geography, demographics, income, etc.
I think the skepticism is reserved more for the actual impact such a poll would have on an election. Remember, the Liberals were leading at the beginning of the last election and lost it half way through.
That's the only time it really matters.
JonB2004 said:
You know what makes me annoyed? People who completely flip their political bias, out of nowhere, and become a voicepiece of the governing party.
Oh, and ultra-nationalists. They just irritate me.
Re: RE: Only 32% back PM on Mideast
Name-calling: Ann Coulter ad hominan technique of poisoning the well. Also, useful technique of world-wide Conservatists. Indicates true lack of argument and desperationto deflect originating topic. That a boy Wally!
wallyj said:
Name-calling: Ann Coulter ad hominan technique of poisoning the well. Also, useful technique of world-wide Conservatists. Indicates true lack of argument and desperationto deflect originating topic. That a boy Wally!
sanch said:
No, on the contrary things will get complicated for the Canadians who choose to live in an area inhabited by the Hezbollah terrorists. These folks have been hiding in a closet for the past 5 years. In case they forget, we are involved in an ongoing global war on terror. The global war on terror is not about borders, but about targeting terrorist groups. Anyone who harbors these terrorists is also open target.
sanch said:
Hezbollah is no different from any other terrorist organization (Taliban, Al Qaeda) and it's members need to be brought to justice...one way or another.
Well Caleb it will happen again if someone changes what I wrote.I and other people with a right-wing bent are continually called neo-cons,extremists,nazis,etc.It doesn't bother me,but when someone takes my post and changes it,well that pisses me off.And you know what,I even think Coulter is over the top.but she doesn't speak for me.
shannon said:
You are defining these Canadians as terrorists on the basis of the same rule of collateral damage that bin laden used for the world trade center. You are on a Canadian board and you have essentially threatened the lives of a large group of Canadians many of whom are children. That is against Canadian law and you can offer your wacko ideas to a judge.
I like to be consistent and I live part time in New York and I don't like messages that I deserve to be a victim because i am consorting with the enemy Americans. This is a stupid semantic game that requires zero intelligence. It basically justifies the killing of civilians.
sanch said:
Hezbollah is no different from any other terrorist organization (Taliban, Al Qaeda) and it's members need to be brought to justice...one way or another.[/quote]
This is simply your opinion. Here is an article which explains the difference between Hezbollah and al Queda.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1220505,00.html
sanch said:
You are wrong, Sanch, as this is not mearly my opinion, but the opinion of both Canada and the US.
In case you've forgotten, Sanch, both Canada and the US had declared Hezbollah a terrorist organization. Canada had done so under the previous Liberal government in 2002. Which means Hezbollah members are open target in our ongoing global war against terror. We need to continously maintain our zero tolerance level towards terrorism.
sanch said:
Which you have shown in your prior statement. Israel is launching attacks in Lebanon in order to strike against the Hezbollah terrorists, who by the way hide amungst women and children. I have a question for you, Sanch. Who are the Hezbollah terroists targetting with their rocket attacks ... Israeli civlians, no one else.
Only Canada, the UK and the US consider Hezbollah to be a terrorist organization in the entire world. Is it a coincidence that each of those countries has:
1. A media largely owned by Jews
2. A potent Jewish lobby.
I am part Jewish so don't call me an anti-Semite or a self hating Jew. I am just stating the facts.
Now a few facts about this issue:
#1. Ha'aretz reported that the IDF planned the invasion "over a year ago."
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0801/p09s02-coop.html
#2. The UN reports that over the last year the IDF has conducted "almost daily" aggressive actions against the Lebanese. These have included killings of an unarmed 15 year old shepard boy tending to his flock, car bomb assassinations of Lebanese leaders, nightly low lever sonic booming.
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unifil/background.html
#3. AP has reported that the 2 IDF soldiers were on Lebanese soil when they were taken.
http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/07/12/ap2873051.html
#4. The fathers of Israel have always wanted the Litani River. Coincidentally Israel wnat the buffer zone up to the Litani River. I am sure this is just a coincidence though. :roll:
No, I would suggest Harper's stance either has to do with his own religious fundamentalism, or cowtowing up to his financial backers.
1. A media largely owned by Jews
2. A potent Jewish lobby.
I am part Jewish so don't call me an anti-Semite or a self hating Jew. I am just stating the facts.
Now a few facts about this issue:
#1. Ha'aretz reported that the IDF planned the invasion "over a year ago."
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0801/p09s02-coop.html
#2. The UN reports that over the last year the IDF has conducted "almost daily" aggressive actions against the Lebanese. These have included killings of an unarmed 15 year old shepard boy tending to his flock, car bomb assassinations of Lebanese leaders, nightly low lever sonic booming.
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/missions/unifil/background.html
#3. AP has reported that the 2 IDF soldiers were on Lebanese soil when they were taken.
http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/07/12/ap2873051.html
#4. The fathers of Israel have always wanted the Litani River. Coincidentally Israel wnat the buffer zone up to the Litani River. I am sure this is just a coincidence though. :roll:
No, I would suggest Harper's stance either has to do with his own religious fundamentalism, or cowtowing up to his financial backers.
Great; another one of these.[i said:
Yes, it is a coincidence. Canada does not base its decisions in relation to security based on whatever faith-based lobby, Jewish, Christian or otherwise, has to say, thank you. Moving on.