I wouldn't agree that Esperanto is a rip off of Spanish (How much Germanic, Slavic and Semitic influence has Spanish got?).
But as for your second point, that might not be a bad idea after all!
First off, Spanish is probably the easiest European language to learn. So certainly French Canadians could learn Spanish more easily than they could learn English, since Spanish and French are of the same language family. And if Spanish is the easiest European language, then I suppose that implies that it would be easier for an English Canadian likewise to elarn Spanish.
And as for the economic benefits beyond just learnability in the classroom? French and English Canadians could still do business with the French and English speaking worlds through their native languages, and at the same time communicate with one another in reasonably good Spanish on both sides as opposed to total linguaistic incompetence on both sides in their yet-to-be-acquired second language. This would also give all Canadians access to most of the South American market as well as Spain.
Only thing is, since I don't know Spanish myself and have only read linguistic information about it, while I know Spanish is probably the easiest European language, I still don't know if it would be easy enough for the average English Canadian (whose native language is Germanic, not Romance) to learn to native-like fluency. But even if it weren't the case, they could prabably still learn it to a higher level of fluency than they could French, which would therefore be a step in the right direction none the less.
Your thoughts?
You are right about the spanish input in esperanto---The reason for this,---as you have said Spanish is a relatively easy langugae to learn due to its internal logic and consistency--and this may have been the reason that esperanto was ---apparently modelled on it. in particular---spanish is totally phonetic-----once you learn how a letter is pronounced ---that it---you can read it----there are few exceptions-----this is in striking contrast to english which is a phonetic nightmare. Native english speakers have no idea what a mess the english language is. astonishingly enough many of them think its a particulary EASY and logical language---it is not. French is phonetically consistent---but grammatically too complex. This does make english an interesting language to study--in terms of its history. My understanding as to why english is so inconsistent is that it is really a Fusion language---a Germanic grammatical base with a large latin-based vocabulary, the other factor is that the english language was still evolving rapidly untill fairly recently----try reading english written in the 1500,s---very different-----in contrast the spanish of that time is virtually identical to todays as it had " stabilized" long before.
All to say that yes I think it would be a great idea to have esperanto as a common human language which despite its similarity to spanish would be a politically neutral one that would be easily learned and enjoyed by all.
Imagine being able to travel anywhere in the world and communicate fluently with whomever you met. If esperanto --or other synthetic language were universally learned it might actually be a very positive factor in helping create a common human culture and potentially lesson cultural misapprehensions.