Omnibus : 2022 Midterm Elections

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,158
11,886
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten said current polling suggests there’s a 67% chance Democrats will win both the House and Senate in the 2026 midterm elections. On the latest episode of “The Enten Scale,” released Sunday, Enten noted that the figure has jumped 15 percentage points in just two months, with three weeks to go yet.

He highlighted strong Democratic polling in states such as Iowa, Alaska, Kansas and Michigan, while pointing to Republican candidates struggling with voters. Texas GOP Senate candidate Ken Paxton, for example, has a net popularity rating of minus 16 points. Enten attributed much of the GOP’s difficulties to Donald Trump, highlighting the president’s underwater net approval ratings on immigration, trade and tariffs, Iran, the economy and inflation, but other than that, the GOP is doing just swell.
If the results match current polling, Enten said, he expects Democrats to hold 54 seats in the U.S. Senate, compared with 46 for Republicans😳. Accusing someone of "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS) is often considered a sign of lazy debating because it functions as an ad hominem fallacy and an ad absurdum shortcut, rather than an engagement with the actual facts or logic of an argument. Instead of disproving a specific point, it attempts to discredit the person making it by labeling them as inherently biased or irrational😉.

Using a catchphrase like TDS allows someone to completely bypass the burden of proof. When faced with a complex or difficult counterargument and serves as an intellectual shortcut to escape defending a position. The grim outlook gripping the GOP follows weeks of polling showing Republicans on track to lose the House amid intense voter anger over the Iran war and rising cost of living — and at grave risk of losing their once-solid majority in the Senate as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,158
11,886
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
It now appears Trump's celebration of the "energy truce" (between Russia and America, or maybe Russia and Ukraine, or maybe all of the above or none of the above) may have been a familiar move for this president, touting an agreement before it had been sealed and delivered, or perhaps negotiated, or even known about by the parties directly involved. In the past, for instance, he has prematurely announced Middle East ceasefires and sweeping peace agreements that may or may not have actually existed.
1791850294097.jpeg
Whether it is impatience on the president's part with the slow pace of diplomacy or a savvy negotiating tactic to push a deal across the finish line, that only he himself is aware of, the result has been to set off a scramble as the world decides what it means – and how to react to it’s reality or complete lack there of.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has become a vocal critic of the president's on the international stage, offered "strong support" for the energy ceasefire, if it’s actually real, but condemned the diesel deal as undermining peace and stability in Europe and helping Russia to finance its "illegal, unjustifiable war against Ukraine".
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he had no advanced notice of the agreement, although he said his nation would abide by it. Russia, for its part, was silent. And on Sunday night, it launched a new wave of attacks on Ukrainian power plants. "It's clear that Putin does not read Truth Social," Zelensky noted wryly on Monday.
1791850316710.jpegZelensky added: "This winter, if Russia does not agree to an energy ceasefire, we will respond."
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
33,158
11,886
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
It was about a month ago when Donald Trump announced an apparent breakthrough on Russia’s war in Ukraine. “Ukraine has agreed not to hit Russian Energy targets,” the American president wrote. “Russia has agreed to do, likewise!”

Reality quickly intervened. Indeed, one day later, The New York Times reported that the Russian and Ukrainian governments made clear “that neither had agreed to an energy cease-fire that President Trump presented as a done deal a day before.”
…touting an agreement before it had been sealed and delivered, or perhaps negotiated, or even known about by the parties directly involved. In the past, for instance, he has prematurely announced Middle East ceasefires and sweeping peace agreements that may or may not have actually existed.
The fact that the American president announced an imaginary agreement about an ongoing war probably should have been deeply humiliating to the Republican, but he nevertheless did the same thing this week.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has become a vocal critic of the president's on the international stage, offered "strong support" for the energy ceasefire, if it’s actually real, but condemned the diesel deal as undermining peace and stability in Europe and helping Russia to finance its "illegal, unjustifiable war against Ukraine".
On Sunday morning, Trump again turned to his social media platform to announce, “Effective immediately, there is an ENERGY CEASEFIRE in the War between Russia and Ukraine. Both parties have agreed.”
Whether it is impatience on the president's part with the slow pace of diplomacy or a savvy negotiating tactic to push a deal across the finish line, that only he himself is aware of, the result has been to set off a scramble as the world decides what it means – and how to react to it’s reality or complete lack there of.
“Both parties had not agreed, and Russian strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure continued. On Monday afternoon, during a brief Q&A, a reporter asked Trump an important and rather obvious question: Why did he say that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an energy ceasefire when that did not actually happen?”

“Well, they agreed, you know why?” Trump replied. “Because I said, ‘You agree.’ That’s why. They agreed because I said they agreed.” (???) So Fake News then???

In other words, when the president told the world in writing that two warring nations had “agreed” to a new policy, he didn’t mean that the countries had actually agreed to the new policy. He instead meant that he told them to agree, which in his mind was the same thing, since he is apparently convinced that he can dictate decisions on behalf of the Ukrainian and Russian governments???
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he had no advanced notice of the agreement, although he said his nation would abide by it. Russia, for its part, was silent. And on Sunday night, it launched a new wave of attacks on Ukrainian power plants. "It's clear that Putin does not read Truth Social," Zelensky noted wryly on Monday.
What they’re (Americans, & I guess the globe) dealing with is a dynamic in which the incumbent American president is comfortable issuing public declarations about governing breakthroughs that have only happened in his mind, which is every bit as unsettling as it sounds. Why would anyone believe Trump’s next boast after he effectively admitted that he’s willing to announce imaginary developments? I honestly don’t know.

If Trump believes he’s handcuffed domestically after the midterms, and he focuses outwardly on international affairs, will this become even more pronounced? As for the idea that Trump might have been trying to affect energy prices with his latest false claim and nine dimensional chess, that apparently didn’t work, either. NBC News reported, “Oil and gas prices rose Monday after an ‘energy ceasefire’ announced by President Donald Trump on Sunday failed to gain traction. Brent crude oil jumped 2% to almost $108 per barrel and U.S. crude oil rose more than 2% to about $94.”