Obliterating the U.S. Dollar..... and the Middle Class

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
April 25, 2006
Obliterating the Dollar ... and the Middle Class?

Preparing for the Economic Typhoon

By MIKE WHITNEY

Gold traders love George Bush. They know that his blundering mismanagement of the economy will keep gold soaring well into the future. In the last year alone gold increased nearly $200 an ounce capping off a 5 year run that has taken it from $274 per ounce to $635 at Friday's close.

These are serious numbers and they reflect the uneasiness with the global political situation (Iran, Nigeria) as well as concern about the oceans of debt generated by our Oval Office numbskull.

Is it really possible for one man to single-handedly obliterate the world's most robust economy?

Guess so.

After 6 years of looting the public till, the cupboard is just about bare. Bush has chalked up another $3 trillion of public debt which sounds the death-knell for Social Security, public education, and the social safety net.

Think I'm kidding? Consider what new Fed-master Ben Bernacke said just yesterday, "If the dollar declined sharply, it would not necessarily disrupt markets".

That's right; the Fed is conspiring to reduce its debt payments by driving a wooden stake into the heart of the greenback. In three to six months the dollar will probably be valued at 1.40 to 1.50 per euro. That is, if the bottom doesn't fall out completely. After all, allies and enemies alike are pretty sick of the good old USA, so it wouldn't be out of the question for someone (perhaps, China) to start a sell-off that would end in disaster.

The dollar is now recognized as the empire's Achilles heel and the primary target for any asymmetrical warfare directed at America. If that means regime change at home, count me in. I'll worry about the wheelbarrow-loads of greenbacks for a loaf of bread some other time.

The Group of Seven industrialized nations (G-7) took a few swipes at Washington's profligate spending this weekend; warning that they wanted "more flexibility" in the Asian currencies. This is a clear sign that the path is being paved for a freefalling dollar while the other currencies gain ground.

How do you like the idea that half of your savings will be erased through executive fiat?

Since Bush took office the dollar has plummeted 30% against the euro. The only thing that has kept it from joining the peso is the skyrocketing oil prices which have allowed the Fed to keep the printing presses going at full tilt. That's because oil is denominated exclusively in dollars, so while the price per barrel continued upward, the Fed was able to circulate another $2.5 trillion of funny money. The high cost of oil has kept the dollar reasonably stable even though the twin-deficits have eroded its true value. Maintaining the monopoly on the sale of oil (which forces foreign central banks to hold billions of greenbacks in reserve) is critical to US prosperity. A switch to euros would weaken demand for the dollar and send the American economy into a tailspin.

Unfortunately, other countries are frustrated with the recklessness of the Bush team and are threatening to destabilize the system. First there was the danger of Iran opening an oil bourse that would compete head-on with the dollar; increasing the number of euros stockpiled in the central banks. Now, the Russian Finance Minister, Alexei Kudrin has fired a broadside at his American counterparts saying, "The US dollar is NOT the world's absolute reserve currency". He noted that the unsustainable' US trade deficit is "causing concern" and that "the international community can hardly be satisfied with this instability."

Kudrin's remarks were greeted with the shock one would expect from a dirty bomb on a crowded subway. America's global dominance requires that it maintain the dollar as the world's reserve currency; if that changes then the US will be unable to trade its painted-script for valuable resources. It would also mean that America would have to start paying back its $9 trillion national debt.

Kudrin's comments were interpreted to mean that Russia might ease away from the dollar in its oil transactions; a change that might spread to other countries that are equally skeptical of Uncle Sam's recklessness.

The eroding value of the dollar is just one of the economic crises facing the American people. A 6 month downturn in housing starts signals that the housing bubble, the largest equity bubble in history, is quickly losing steam. With long term interest rates steadily rising (along with energy prices) the shaky loans that were blessed by former Fed-chief, Greenspan, are beginning to unravel. "No down payment", ARMs (Adjustable Rate Mortgages) and easy financing have the over-extended American public teetering towards insolvency. Foreclosures are up, mortgages balances are at unprecedented levels, and inventories are larger than they've been since the early 90s. Last month produced the biggest slowdown in sales in a decade and the real pain hasn't even begun. At least $3 trillion of the $9 trillion equity bubble is built entirely on the cheap money pumped into the system by the Federal Reserve to keep the economy percolating while Bush and Co. stole every last farthing in the US Treasury. Greenspan's low interest rates were nothing more than a carnival-hucksters' scam to shift the vast wealth of America's middle class into the pockets of well-heeled constituents.

Thanks, Alan.

Last year Americans used their homes as a personal ATM; withdrawing over $600 billion to pay off credit card debt and for personal spending. That "presto-equity" is quickly evaporating as home prices flatten out and wages continue to stagnate. Personal debt is currently in the stratosphere and there are some gloomy signs that the American consumer, that great engine of global economic power, is finally tapped out. Consumer spending represents 70% of US GDP (Gross Domestic Product) so, as housing prices retreat and energy prices increase; Americans will face the greatest economic challenge since the Great Depression.

One thing is absolutely certain; Bush will stick by his constituents to the bitter end. It is physically impossible for him to act in the interests of the American people. He won't be deterred by the falling dollar, the deflating housing market, or the skyrocketing energy prices. He'll make his budget-busting tax cuts permanent and plunge the country into a sea of red ink.

Betting that George Bush will do the wrong thing for the nation is not a matter of conjecture; it is a mathematical certainty. He is deliberately destroying the middle class, the prospects for upward mobility, and the currency. The economic underpinnings of American democracy have been demolished in just 6 short years. Smart people will prepare themselves for the typhoon ahead.

Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
RE: Obliterating the U.S

Is that the only reason gold soared? I don't think so. But I know little of the details of economics, just the more or less obvious stuff on the surface.Like if you live on borrowed money you're not free, whoever holds your notes owns you and that's who you work for. Anything wrong with that thinking?
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
DB

Literally the day after the GOP won the 2002 Congressional elections, I was in the market heavily buying gold. It was the easiest money I've ever made because the Republicans told you exactly what they going to do, then did it.

I held gold until a few weeks ago when I sold every share I had. (F*** I'm always early.) I will be a seller all year of stocks and commodities because I see risks rising.

Yes, that is the only reason why gold soared a few weeks ago. Bush wants to devalue the dollar.

Then, last week, the Fed released the minutes from their most recent FOMC meeting, which intimated that the Fed was almost done. Gold, stocks, oil, base metals and pretty much everything else went up.

But I don't think long-term interest rates are done going up. Yields on the 10 year US Tbond rose 0.1% today, which is a pretty big move, and is also sitting at a multi-year high.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
The Fed is pooched? Really? I knew they were knackered, but pooched?

dang.

so

long term silver?
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
btw, what's with the BoC Bank Rate? do they really think they can curb petro-inflation with interest rates?
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
Pumping up the interest rate isn't going to effect the price of oil to any useful extent and its the price of oil that's going to be pushing inflation the next while. I realize its popular in many a powerful circle these days, but interests rates are not a pancea for economic woes any more than deficit spending was back in the 70s. If that's what they're hoping then all I can say is IMO tossing another ideology, monetarism this time instead of Kenysianism, at the same old situation is insanity. afaik, there's nothing to indicate current inflation is being fueled by excess money supply. not up here, anyways.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
RE: Obliterating the U.S

Raising interest rates decreases economic growth, which slows the demand for oil, as it does with all commodities. What's been driving the price of oil is not a lack of supply but higher than expected demand.

Raising interest rates drains excess liquidity from the financial system, which is what is happening now. The central banks are starting to mop up the excess liquidity. That's why asset prices, especially in commodities and real estate, are at risk.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Re: RE: Obliterating the U.S

darkbeaver said:
What other areas of the economy will hiked interest rates affect. What will it do to housing starts.

It will effect everything, but it depends more on the severity of the increases, the speed of the increases and what the term structure of interest rates do.

The term structure is the different time periods of debt, i.e. 1 year, 10 years, 30 years, etc. If short-term rates continue to rise and long-term rates do not. then that could bring a recession as most financial institutions borrow short and lend long-term, capturing the difference between lower short-term rates and higher long-term rates. If that spread is negative, borrowing stops, and economic growth slows or contracts. In the parlance, that is known as an inverted yield curve.

If rates spike quickly, that's dangerous because financial institutions aren't always prepared for such. This is the most worrying scenario.

If rates rise too high, it will choke economic growth more than necessary. This is the most common mistake for central banks.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
Last I heard inflation was running around 2.2%, which is well within the BoC target and below economic growth. In other words, healthy so I'm not convinced we have a problem with excess liquidity. The rising price of oil itself is supposed to reduce its demand, I don't understand the presumed need to interfere with the market using monetary policy to solve the problem. Besides that's an awful big stick to use against a single factor in the market. It not like Canada's going to change the price of oil by making loans more expensive.

Nothing to cry foul over at this point but it seems to me the BoC is more interested in playing follow the leader right now than maintaining an independent economy. If there's anything the BoC could have done at this point to help the US out of its pickle it would be to raise the interest rate. Just thought I'd mention it. Higher interest rates DO tend to favour well established businesses though. Thought I'd mention that, too. :wink:
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Inflation in the US was 3.5% last year. It was probably higher than that considering the heuristical adjustments the statisticians make masks the true rise in the cost of housing. But even such, it would be around 4-5%. That's too high.

The excess liquidity can be seen in the monetary aggregates, ie M1, M2, M3, MZM, etc., which grew at a phenomenally fast rate the first 3-4 years of the decade. That growth has now slowed, with all but M3 now growing less than the nominal rate of the economy. The excess liquidity did not end up in consumer prices but in asset prices such as real estate and commodities. That liquidity is being drained, and eventually, I think there is a higher than normal chance of asset prices getting hit hard. Don't know if it will happen, but the risk is certainly there.

As for Canada, the BoC is in a quandry. Real interest rates average around 2%, so Canada is in a neutral position. The Canadian dollar is probably overvalued somewhat, so not increasing interest rates would slow the loonies's ascent. However, with real estate prices doing stupid things in Canada, the BoC may want to cool that market to avoid a worse problem later.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
I think the housing market and people in general would benefit from reigning in the banks a little. I couldn't believe what they were trying to sell me last time through.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
RE: Obliterating the U.S

Paul Krugman...

Concerns about a dollar crisis can be divided into two questions: Will there be a plunge in the dollar? Will this plunge have nasty macroeconomic consequences?

The answer to the first question depends on whether there is investor myopia, a failure to take into account the requirement that the dollar eventually fall enough to stabilize U.S. external debt at a feasible level. Although it’s always dangerous to second guess markets, the data do seem to suggest such myopia... The various rationales and rationalizations for the U.S. current account deficit that have been advanced in recent years don’t seem to help us avoid the conclusion that investors aren’t taking the need for future dollar decline into account. So it seems likely that there will be a Wile E. Coyote moment when investors realize that the dollar’s value doesn’t make sense, and that value plunges.

The case for believing that a dollar plunge will do great harm is much less secure. In the medium run, the economy can trade off lower domestic demand, mainly the result of a fall in real housing prices, for higher next exports, the result of dollar depreciation. Any economic contraction in the short run will be the result of differences in adjustment speeds, with the fall in domestic demand outpacing the rise in net exports. The United States in 2006 isn’t Argentina in 2001: although there is a very good case that the dollar will decline sharply, nothing in the data points to an Argentine-style economic implosion when that happens. Still, this probably won’t be fun.

... continued

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/04/krugman_will_th.html#more
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Sebastian Edwards

NBER Working Paper No. 12154
Issued in April 2006
NBER Program(s): IFM

---- Abstract -----

In this paper I use a large multi-country data set to analyze the determinants of abrupt and large “current account reversals.” The results from a variance-component probit model indicate that the probability of experiencing a major current account reversal is positively affected by larger current account deficits, lower prices of exports relative to imports, and expansive monetary policies. On the other hand, this probability is lower for more advanced countries, and for countries with flexible exchange rates. An analysis of the marginal effects of current account deficits and of the predicted probability of reversal indicates that both have increased significantly for the U.S. since 1999. However, the level of this probability is still on the low side. I estimate that the predicted probability of a current account reversal in the U.S. has increased from 1.7% in 1999, to 14.9% in 2006.

http://www.nber.org/papers/w12154
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
This is an excellent thread.

As always, Toro, all ideological partisans need
to chill out and examine this analysis.

Some day, tell the story about the Dutch Black Tulip,
one of the first detailed accounts of an economic
BUBBLE.

But, on with the Dollar Devaluation analysis.