NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission

[Locutus]

If you read The New York Times‘ story on President Barack Obama‘s private meeting with news columnists Friday morning, you may have caught one quote that made the President look particularly bad:

In his meeting with the columnists, Mr. Obama indicated that he did not see enough cable television to fully appreciate the anxiety after the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, and made clear that he plans to step up his public arguments.
​

The President of the United States failed to understand that Americans were anxious after two major terrorist attacks in Western cities because he doesn’t watch TV? It’s an admission that opponents are sure to use to make the president seem out-of-touch at best, and unconcerned about a serious threat at worst.

Many politicos and journalists immediately saw the newsworthiness of the statement, especially after CNN’s Brian Stelter drew attention to it.


more


NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission | Mediaite

Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors

By Kate on December 18, 2015 12:17 PM | 5 Comments



Mediaite: NY Times Stealth-Edits Article to Remove Embarrassing Obama Admission

Update: New York Times editors also changed the story's headline four separate times...

 

[darkbeaver]

Yeah, well, he's on the way out. So he's stupid, I was convinced before he was elected the first time, he dosn't care any more, yes we can and he did. I just can't get excited about the great black hope anymore. Hillarys up for sure, and then a tranny and then an alien and then a coffeee table.

 

[Locutus]

this is more an obvious biased media story than an ignorant mongrel story.

 

[darkbeaver]

this is more an obvious biased media story than an ignorant mongrel story.

I can appreciate that, now that you mentioned it. I'll read it again.

Ok Newyork Times fixes the message. That's bean thier job for a while. Next weeks news will erase it anyway. Are you suggesting conspiracy?

 

[Locutus]

moi? prog media conspiracy? :lol:

 

[darkbeaver]

You watch yourself, being radicalized is no laughing mattter.

 

[Locutus]

You watch yourself, being radicalized is no laughing mattter.

it's not bad with the right drugs.

 

[darkbeaver]

it's not bad with the right drugs.

That's what there for, they make you better.

 

[Jinentonix]

it's not bad with the right drugs.

That would be free-radicalization eh? :lol:

 

[darkbeaver]

Free radcals is right behind saturated fat, I think

the human has more enemies this century then evr before, plasticwill save us, exploitation of hydrocarbon, god wants us to develope it and burn it in an ecologically sound blah

 

[Jinentonix]

Actually, plastic can save us. With plastics derived from vegetable oils we can greatly reduce our need for oil. And many of those plastics are bio-degradable which is a double bonus.