No long-term future in tar sands, says Alberta's premier

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Obvious is obvious.

No long-term future in tar sands, says Alberta's premier

The leader of Canada’s biggest oil-producing province has declared she sees no long-term future in fossil fuels, predicting Alberta would wean itself off dirty energy within a century.

In an early reveal of her forthcoming new energy policy, Alberta’s Rachel Notley said she would fight climate change by cleaning up the tar sands, shutting down coal-fired power plants, and converting to wind and solar power.

Notley also forecast an eventual future beyond fossil fuels – a dramatic change for Alberta - and a track that has put her on a collision course with Canada’s conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper.

The Alberta leader is due to unveil the new policy ahead of the international UN climate conference in Paris this December.

The province sits atop the world’s third-biggest known carbon reserves in the tar sands, and has rapidly ramped up production to some 2 m barrels of crude a day. By 2020, the province will account for more than a third of Canada’s total carbon pollution, according to government figures.

Notley, whose election last May broke the Conservatives’ 44-year lock on power in the province, said she intends that to change. “I don’t think we are defined by energy. Certainly in the short to medium term that is an asset that we have, so we have to look at how we develop it carefully and responsibly because of the obligation we have to the people employed in the industry,” she told the Guardian.

She went on: “Do I see that as our reason for being 100 years from now? Well, I hope we will have learned a lesson of diversification by then.”

http://www.theguardian.com/environm...erm-future-in-tar-sands-alberta-rachel-notley
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Yep, great idea. Because as everyone who can think knows, relying on the vagaries of weather is the best way to ensure a steady power supply.
How do you power industry with just solar and/or wind? Does Notley plan on never having any manufacturing in Alberta again? I have to admit though, killing off manufacturing is a great way to reduce emissions. Well not really, it just moves the problem elsewhere where there are NO environmental controls.

 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
This is a series of solutions not one solution. Wind, solar and oil will be the future
Of course hydro is a major player and will be going long after oil and the wind fad
are over.
Consideration of the future is needed though because in terms of time 100 years
is not that far and the people have to plan ahead it is what inspires science
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
They're just continuing the same spending habits as the PCs.

They just don't have the same revenue stream because they're stuck in tar.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,771
9,718
113
Washington DC
Yep, great idea. Because as everyone who can think knows, relying on the vagaries of weather is the best way to ensure a steady power supply.
How do you power industry with just solar and/or wind? Does Notley plan on never having any manufacturing in Alberta again? I have to admit though, killing off manufacturing is a great way to reduce emissions. Well not really, it just moves the problem elsewhere where there are NO environmental controls.
You're right. Oh, if only there were some way to move electricity from where it's generated to where it's used!

I know! Buckets! Let's sell buckets of electricity!