New Orleans: Bush's Zero Tolerance for Misery

jjw1965

Electoral Member
Jul 8, 2005
722
0
16
Kurt Nimmo | September 2 2005


It's like watching one of those special effects loaded Hollywood disaster movies: destroyed buildings and desperate people flagging down helicopters from rooftops, surrounded by polluted and debris choked water. It is of course illogical to place blame for natural disasters on the government -- but we can certainly squarely place the blame for the wholly ineffective response on the government, particularly the federal government and the Bush administration. "Chalk up the city of New Orleans as a cost of Bush's Iraq war," writes Paul Craig Roberts. "There were not enough helicopters to repair the breached levees and rescue people trapped by rising water. Nor are there enough Louisiana National Guardsmen available to help with rescue efforts and to patrol against looting."

But it is not simply the fact the neocons hijacked the National Guard and sent them packing to Iraq. In 1995, the Army Corps of Engineers began a project to shore up the New Orleans levees. But in 2003, Bush grabbed the money from that project to pay for his invasion and occupation. As Lorelei Kelly writes for Democracy Arsenal, after Bush invaded Iraq "the flow of federal dollars toward SELA [Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project] dropped to a trickle" and "the Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security -- coming at the same time as federal tax cuts -- was the reason for the strain." In short, the "war" in Iraq, as top Bushites admit was started for the sake of Israel's "security" (and for the Straussian neocon desire to slice and dice the Muslim Middle East), has come home to roost and the poor people of the Gulf coast are paying the price with their lives and property. "Distracted by its phony war on terrorism, the U.S. government had made no preparations in the event Hurricane Katrina brought catastrophe to New Orleans. No contingency plan existed. Only now after the disaster are FEMA and the Corps of Engineers trying to assemble the material and equipment to save New Orleans from the fate of Atlantis," adds Roberts.

Instead of massive aid, Bush doled out a few condescending remarks. "Nothing in his words, facial expression, or body language indicated that Bush either comprehended or was even concerned about the monumental catastrophe that has struck hundreds of thousands of people in one of the United States' greatest and most historic cities," comments the WSWS Editorial Board. "For the Bush administration, the tragedy of New Orleans is not particularly important and requires no major effort on the part of the United States.... [The] language ... chosen by Bush's handlers ... convey a definite message: the administration will not allow the disaster to entangle the federal government in significant financial commitments." Instead of helping citizens ravaged by natural disater, Bush will spend billions on the "war" in Iraq (and soon elsewhere) and continue his tax breaks for rich people and corporations. Bush expects the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, Catholic Charities, and "all other members of the armies of compassion" to help the poor people of New Orleans and the stricken Gulf coast.

As for the efforts of these poor people to secure water and food (in lieu of sufficient help from Bush and the feds), many of them have taken to looting. "I think there ought to be zero tolerance of people breaking the law during an emergency such as this, whether it be looting, or price-gouging at the gasoline pump or taking advantage of charitable giving, or insurance fraud," Bush said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," reports Reuters. In other words, Bush is encouraging people be shot for stealing food and water, as well as televisions and Nikes (and the latter is nothing more than poor people grabbing useless consumer junk the corporate media incessantly tells them they need or else they are somehow less than human). "If people need water and food, we're going to do everything we can to get them water and food. But it's very important for the citizens in all affected areas to take personal responsibility and assume kind of a civic sense of responsibility so the situation doesn't get out of hand, so people don't exploit the vulnerable," Bush added. Of course, if not for Bush's stealing money from the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, thus undermining the levees, people would not be trapped on rooftops or in attics, slowly dying of thirst and starvation.

Hopefully Americans will get the message with this latest fiasco: Bush and crew don't care about average Americans (unless they are rich Americans) and the people stranded in New Orleans will have to seek "charity" from churches (since compassion is faith-based) or simply die from dehydration, disease, and neglect. If they steal a bag of Doritos, they will risk "zero tolerance," that is to say risk summary execution (since New Orleans is currently under martial law). Americans need to realize Bush and crew are a den of mass murdering vipers and allowing them to control government and roam free (not arrested and sent to The Hague to face prosecution for crimes against humanity) will ultimately result in the destruction of this country.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
not sure if this will fit here ......but here goes...

It Never Was 'Can-Do' Government
by William L. Anderson
by William L. Anderson



Each Monday and Friday, I make sure that I read the latest rants from Paul Krugman in his New York Times column. While I generally agree with him when he speaks of the war in Iraq, when it comes to everything else, he is little more than an ignorant statist – granted, an ignorant statist with a doctorate in economics from the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology. I expected him to write about what is becoming our own Gulf War, and he did not disappoint.

Krugman wants us to return to the era of "can-do" government. This is not even the government that placed astronauts on the moon; no, it was the "can-do" government during the glorious Clinton years that handed out checks to disaster "victims" via the Federal Emergency Management Agency. As usual, Krugman demonstrates that his experience of being a political operative combined with his mathematical graduate training at MIT is no match for a simple understanding of economics and society. Those Austrian Economists he so loves to criticize are much better equipped to recognize just what has happened and why. (For starters, read Lew Rockwell’s outstanding comments on this whole matter.) It never has been "can-do" government, even though people like Krugman and E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post cannot recognize that fact.

As a real-life "Lord of the Flies" scene unfolds in New Orleans, we forget the simple reasons why this tragedy has occurred: New Orleans for many years has not been as much a functioning city as it has been an urban reservation. Yes, the place has a beautiful French Quarter and the restaurants are outstanding. There is much to love about this city that seems to have lost its future, but even a cursory look always exposed a much darker side.

New Orleans is the home of some of the most dangerous and hideous public housing projects in the country, not to mention huge neighborhoods of tumble-down shacks. Much of its population owes its existence not to tourism or the commerce of the ports or oil and gas, but rather to the federal government. As I said in the previous paragraph, much of New Orleans has been little more than an urban reservation, and now we are seeing the ultimate – and logical – results of America’s grand experiment with the welfare state.

The mobs that have terrorized this city over the past few days did not come from the working sector of the city. Instead, they came from the projects and the other places where the only commerce is in drugs, sex and liquor, and where those "bourgeois" values so hated by intellectuals and the editorial staffs of the New York Times and Washington Post are not to be found.

We forget that these are the people who depend upon the state for their entire sustenance. From the welfare case worker to the public housing director to the clinic doctors to the parole officers to the policeman, these are the "significant others" in the lives of people living in these urban reservations. All of their exposure to "social" organization is through government, which operates by force.

To the contrary, most of the people who survived the tragedy and who have been heroic in their response are people whose lives revolve around organizations built largely upon trust and exchanges of mutual benefit. The New York Times crowd may disparage the world of churches, business, nuclear families, schools (especially private schools), civic clubs and the like, but it is through those voluntary organizations that many of us are taught the basic lessons that enable us to survive and even prosper when disasters strike.

People of the reservation, on the other hand, have none of these important support mechanisms. Few of them have intact nuclear families, religious education either through church or school is almost nonexistent, and forget participation in civic organizations (other than the government-organized tenant associations of the projects). In short, what little order they have in their lives is kept together through force. While they may be "free" to come and go, their existence is little better than what one has in prison.

(On a related note, many young men – and some young women – from these reservations find their way into various stages of incarceration. A reason that many of them convert to Islam is that it is a religion that consists of numerous rules and regulations and, for many of them, presents a mechanism through which they can have some organization in their lives.)

For the most part, their experience with private property is limited to the few personal items that they own. They live in places built by a government that has no respect for the private property of others. Thus, no one should be shocked when in a catastrophe occurs, they respect the property and safety of no one else.

In our cities, the urban reservations are mostly populated with blacks. However, the behavior that is exhibited by the public housing population here is little different than what one would see in places like Liverpool, England, which is little more than a vast urban reservation populated with poor whites. This is not a racial matter, even if some wish to see it that way. Instead, we are dealing with people who given just enough to survive, but who have no real responsibilities in life except to show up at the government office on the day that checks or goods are dispensed.

The intellectuals and members of the political classes who dreamed up and created these public housing schemes looked down upon the world of work, private enterprise, and religion. They really believed that during the 1950s and 60s when they bulldozed entire neighborhoods – and the small businesses that helped sustain them – and replaced them with giant, sterile housing projects with nary a store or shop in the vicinity – that they were "solving" the "problem" of "substandard" housing. Now, when we see those policies coming to their full and horrible fruition in New Orleans, they can only demand that we expend even more resources into these places.

It seems that the central belief was that government could take care of people from cradle to grave, provide for all of their "needs," and shield them from the real world of work, risk, and even tragedy. Yet, through all this, they created a hellish world in which everyday life is punctuated with crime, violence, and hopelessness. While we can condemn the looting, vandalism, and predatory behavior that has become the scene in New Orleans today, we need to remember that many of the real perpetrators are not just the people committing these horrible acts, but also those who put the urban reservation system into being.

People like Paul Krugman and E.J. Dionne like to call the welfare system a "safety net." I would like to think of it as something akin to a pit. As long as the "underclass" that this system produces can be kept out of sight and out of mind, we like to fool ourselves into thinking that government has taken care of their needs. It is only when the horror that has been the fate of New Orleans happens that we see the system in all its evil.

September 3, 2005
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Bush might have zero tolerance for misery.........and yet has a propensity for creating it ......

:roll:
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
New Orleans and Baghdad—two sides of the same policy
By Bill Van Auken
3 September 2005
Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

As US National Guard troops—just returned from Iraq—moved into New Orleans Friday with “shoot-to-kill” orders, and Blackhawk helicopters flew over the city, the essential unity between the policies pursued by Washington at home and abroad found stark expression.

Lt. Gen. Steven Blum of the National Guard said half of the 7,000 National Guardsmen arriving in Louisiana had shortly before been serving overseas and were “highly proficient in the use of lethal force.”

Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco declared, “They have M-16s and they are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot to kill... and I expect they will.”

The reaction of the Bush administration to the catastrophe of its own making in the invasion of Iraq and its response to the disaster unleashed by Hurricane Katrina on the US Gulf Coast have both revealed gross incompetence and a criminal contempt for human life. Both have led to soaring death tolls and immense suffering.

There are direct connections between the humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq and the one that is unfolding in New Orleans. Barely a month ago, Lt. Colonel Pete Schneider of the Louisiana National Guard complained to the media that essential equipment the force had taken to Iraq last October—humvees, high-water vehicles, generators and refuelers—had been left in the country. He stressed that in the event of a serious natural disaster, the lack of the equipment could pose problems in mounting a speedy rescue and relief response.

The failure of the levee and the flooding of 80 percent of New Orleans are linked to repeated budget cuts carried out by the Bush administration since the war in Iraq began.

In the 2004 budget, the Army Corps of Engineers requested $11 million for a hurricane protection project in the New Orleans area. It was allotted just half that amount, $5.5 million. In the 2005 budget, the Corps requested $22.5 million, and received one quarter of its request, $5.7 million. In the 2006 budget, the Bush administration proposed an appropriation of just $2.9 million.

Where the money meant to reinforce the levees and protect New Orleans went was no mystery to local officials. Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, told the Times-Picayune in June 2004: “It appears that the money has been moved in the president’s budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that’s the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can’t be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us.”

Meanwhile, FEMA—the Federal Emergency Management Agency—the principal agency for dealing with such disasters, has been “systematically downgraded and all but dismantled by the Department of Homeland Security,” as Eric Holdeman, the director of the Office of Emergency Management in King County, Washington, wrote in the Washington Post this week. Instead, disaster relief resources have been shifted to the so-called “global war on terrorism,” the all-purpose pretext for US military aggression abroad.

Vast funds expended on the Iraq war and other acts of US militarism have been drained away from social spending at home. With the upcoming approval of yet another emergency spending bill for Iraq, Congress will have appropriated $250 billion for the war. Washington is spending on average $5.4 billion a month on the war. Thus, the Pentagon will expend in less than two months the equivalent of the entire relief package that the Bush administration has requested for New Orleans and the devastated Gulf Coast.

The outrage of New Orleans’ abandoned citizens, who shout “we want help” and ask angrily why Washington has proven incapable of supplying the most basic forms of organization or relief, strangely echoes protests by the people of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities.

With the US occupation now halfway into its third year, three out of four Iraqi families report irregular electricity. Cuts in water supply are frequent, and fully 40 percent of urban households report sewage in the streets. A nationwide health crisis is growing worse, child malnutrition is widespread, and the carnage against civilians continues every day.

This chaos and gross negligence have characterized the US occupation since day one. After US troops rolled into Baghdad, mobs were allowed—if not actively encouraged—to systematically loot Iraqi government facilities, schools and hospitals, deepening the immense destruction already wrought by American bombs, shells and missiles.

As a pre-invasion memo leaked from the Blair government in Britain earlier this year warned, Washington had decided upon war but had given “little thought” to the invasion’s aftermath. That is, as it prepared to militarily occupy a war-ravaged country of 27 million people, the Bush administration had no concern or even plans for what would happen to them.

It is a tragic irony that thousands of young men and women in the Louisiana and Mississippi National Guard are deployed in Iraq, sent to kill and be killed for a lie. Not a few of them are drawn from poor and working class families that have suffered the worst from Hurricane Katrina. The Bush administration and its Democratic allies—having abandoned their fabricated claims about weapons of mass destruction—now insist that these troops are fighting a war to bring “democracy” to Iraq.

But the national disgrace in New Orleans poses an obvious question: what can a government that abandons its own people to die in the streets and presides over levels of social inequality that shock the conscience of the world teach anyone about “democracy?”

Iraq was from its origins a predatory war—an exercise in international plunder. It was aimed at employing overwhelming military force to seize control of vital energy resources and thereby assert the geopolitical hegemony of American capitalism against its economic rivals.

The plundering of Iraq has gone hand-in-hand with the looting of the American treasury at home by means of unending cuts in social spending together with massive tax cuts for the top income brackets. These policies are carried out by a government and a two-party political system that is dedicated to serving interests of a financial oligarchy and is as indifferent to the lives of the poor and working class in New Orleans as it is to the people of Iraq.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
September 5, 2005

Racism in America doesn't dress up in a cowl and flowing white robes anymore. Instead, it dons an immaculate blue suit and tie and conceals itself behind the lofty language of democracy, freedom and human dignity; but, its racism all the same.
We've seen an explosion of racism in America since George Bush took office. It started out after 9-11 and was aimed exclusively at Muslims; a vulnerable group with a paltry voice in government. The administration took full advantage of their political weakness by tossing whomever they chose in prison without due process and without concern for their personal health or safety. Many, of course, were brutalized and traumatized by a system that still boldly touted human rights from the presidential podium.
It was all lies.
The cruelty and inhumanity has steadily escalated, as it normally does whenever sadism and arrogance replace the rule of law. The chronicle of abusive treatment at American facilities across the globe is nearly endless; the stories abound of the imaginative and finely-detailed methods of maximizing human suffering. Although they may have failed at everything else, the Bush administration has proved to be an astute practitioner of torture.
The primary target of these crimes has been Muslims; neither Guantanamo nor Abu Ghraib have even one Christian or Jewish inmate. In fact, there are special laws for Israeli spies who steal top-secret information from the Pentagon and pass it on through their respective lobbies. Both of the indicted leaders of AIPAC, the American-Israeli lobby, have been released on bond while Muslims, who have been charged with no crime at all, continue to languish in Guantanamo Bay. This is the current state of America's apartheid judicial system.

New Orleans adds a new chapter to the Bush digest of calculated bigotry. While the wealthy white families were able to beat a hasty retreat out of doomed city, the poor and black were left to sink in the toxic stew unleashed by America's greatest natural disaster.
No one who saw the televised footage of the Convention center and the Superdome had any misgivings about what they were seeing. America's long-lost companion, racial-hatred, had stuck its ugly head up into the camera lens and was pouring out onto living rooms across the land.

Bush critic Michael Moore may have summarized the feelings of the nation best when he noted, "C'mon, they're black! I mean, it's not like this happened to Kennebunkport".."Can you imagine leaving white people on their roofs for five days? Don't make me laugh!"
Moore's right; no one can imagine that scenario, because it would never happen. The brunt of the catastrophe was directed at society's cast-offs; the poor and black who couldn't simply load up the $40,000 SUV and take off. They were left to face the rising waters and the government neglect without any prospect of real assistance. When you can't buy your way out, you're left to rot; that's how the "invisible hand" of the free market operates. The message is clear; if you have nothing, you are nothing.

Americans have been patting themselves on the back for years about the great strides that have been made in civil rights and social justice. It's all rubbish. Just take a look at the faces of the people who were left to drown in the noxious soup of a force-4 hurricane. We all know who these people are; they are the "other America"; the America that is scrupulously kept out of the media so that the narrative of prosperity, equality and justice can flood the airwaves like the effluent coursing down Bourbon Street. Nothing has been accomplished in civil rights. Even the band-aid programs like bussing, welfare and affirmative action have been dismantled by people who believe that we all begin life on a level playing field.
What nonsense.
There's no level playing field anymore than there is "compassionate conservatism"; Bush proved that by withholding food and water from starving people for 3 days.
What we all saw last week on national TV was the moral equivalent of the Rodney King beating multiplied times 30,000; that's the number of people locked away in the feces-infected Superdome. It gave us all a good look into America's dark-heart, where the evil secret we keep tucked-away in a vault can always be denied; racism.
Abandoning those people during a national tragedy was the most blatant, despicable act of racism I've seen in my 53 years of life. The beating of Rodney King pales by comparison.

Presently, the African Americans who were stranded in New Orleans are being trundled off to the four corners of the Western states where they'll be disposed of quietly in filthy encampments or religious facilities. Their rage and frustration sent shivers of distress through the body politic and put a hefty dent in our collective sense of self-esteem. Once again, Bush and his vindictive troupe have proved that it is always possible to sink ever-lower in the bottomless well of moral corruption.

Courtesy and Copyright © Mike Whitney
:cry: :( :x [/url]
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Would think that the following belongs here too.... :(

New Orleans: Casualties of War
Rafael Renteria


September 4, 2005

When hip hop artist Kayne West said "George Bush doesn't care about black people," NBC cameras cut away. "They've given them permission to go down and shoot us," West said. In America, telling simple and obvious truths is going too far. Censors for NBC switched to a comic.

America has no mercy for peoples of color. It bombs them without pity in Iraq—wiping out access to water, to health care. The deaths of over half a million Iraqi children—due strictly to US backed sanctions—was considered "worth it" by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

President Bush thought seizing Iraq's oil fields was worth the sacrifice of the city of New Orleans.

In order to help finance the war, Bush cut spending in 2004 for repair and upgrading of the levee and pump system that protected the city from massive flooding—even though just such a disaster was rated among the top three devastating potentials facing the US in the short term. The city, which has been called a "repository of the deep scars of the American colonization" and slavery, is 67 percent black. Those stranded in the city were, unsurprisingly, overwhelmingly Black.

Let's make it plain, as Malcolm X used to say.

Bush consciously decided that sacrificing the lives of African people in New Orleans was worth the price—that the descendants of America's former slaves were expendable in the face of the empire's gluttony for oil and global supremacy. The city and its poor inhabitants are casualties of war.

Having made such a decision, it must have been hard for Bush to turn back, to put up a front, to pretend suddenly that the lives of Black children matter any more than the lives of Iraqi children. In fact, he couldn't do it, any more than Albright could say Iraqi children mattered to her and keep a straight face.

Black children had to die so that Iraqi children might die, and Iraqi children had to die because Exxon and the Empire need oil. The logic was airtight.

The emperor could only play golf while Black children drowned, while they died of dehydration, hunger, shock and lack of medicines. Just like in Iraq.

During his belated visit the President evaded the worst-hit areas of the city, but to hear Bush tell it, things were "not going exactly right".

Trying to act the part of a truly sober adult he later assured us "I understand the devastation requires more than one day's attention." In a typical Bush-ism he called the situation "worse than imaginable." But before leaving the city he couldn't resist a joke, reminiscing about having come to New Orleans and drinking "occasionally too much.'' Perhaps he'd drunk one too many "Hurricanes."

The President admitted his response to the devastation had been "unacceptable." Asked what he meant Bush said, "Well, I'm talking about the fact that we don't have enough security in New Orleans yet."

A Washington Times op-ed made the point clearly; "This horror will not subside with the flood. The government must treat the battlefield of Katrina as it would any other field of engagement: Protect and provide for the innocent and eliminate the enemy, and do it now, before we lose New Orleans... If looters fire on the troops, the troops should answer with suppressing fire. If the United States can project power anywhere in the world in a matter of hours, it can defend New Orleans and the coast of Mississippi."

It's not Black children that matter—it's having soldiers on the ground to kill those who might feed them, to kill those who dare to survive in the absence of any help from "above."

In this scenario it's not the hurricane or the endless delays in aid and the Black deaths they caused that are destroying the city—the "horror" is people trying to feed their babies and themselves, people trying, literally, not to die of thirst after days with no water. These are the enemy, just as other hungry people, the people of Central America and Viet Nam, were the enemy—and for the same reasons.

As troops arrived on Friday, they were told to point their guns downward, to avoid any comparison with Iraq. But the Army Times called the crisis in New Orleans an "insurgency," and the comparison to Iraq is just the comparison we must make, and make plainly.

The war in the streets of Baghdad gave rise to the deaths of thousands in New Orleans and to the destruction of the city. In both cases peoples of color are regarded—and being dealt with—as America's enemy. "This place is going to look like Little Somalia," Brig. Gen. Gary Jones told the Army Times "We're going to go out and take this city back. This will be a combat operation to get this city under control."

Bush and the system that gave rise to him bear responsibility, direct responsibility, for every single death in New Orleans—without exception. And their plan is to crush people of color who refuse to lie down and die in the interest of Empire.

Just like in Iraq.

Bush and Co. not only allowed the desperation and chaos in New Orleans to develop—they created it. The pressing and deeply disturbing question is "why"?


any ideas as to "why"??? folks?? Let's feel free to speculate ..... :wink:
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO GET YOU PEOPLE TO DO YOUR F*ING JOBS?!?!

by Rob in Baltimore - 9/05/2005 10:12:00 AM


I swear, my disgust and hatred of these people grows deeper by the moment. Let me say once again, echoing Jefferson Parish President Aaron Broussard (joined by many of you on the comments), SHUT THE F*CK UP AND DO YOUR JOB. The situation on the ground is getting worse. There are reports of dysentery in Biloxi - that was in every single disaster scenario, so don't you DARE tell us you couldn't plan for this too.

Condoleezza, if you take another trip to the disaster area without a head of state in tow I will personally make sure you never get any job in the NFL when the reign of you godforsaken bunch of idiots is finally over. GET BACK TO WASHINGTON AND DO YOUR JOB - DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Not sure how to do that? Let me give you a clue. Nations want to send help, others need more prodding. Kuwait, for instance, has 10% of the world's oil, think they could do better than $500 million? I sure as sh*t do.

Michael Chertoff, you can stay talking on TV all you want. You have shown yourself to be such an utter moron that I think that the more you try and do, the more damage you'll do. Stay out of the way, in front of a TV camera making an ass out of yourself repeatedly each hour is a perfect distraction for you.

Media: WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO COVER THESE BULLSH*T PHOTO-OPS? You enable them to waste time with the mutual gratification society. No one in America is any more informed when they are over, it accomplishes

All Canadian politicians should take note ya worthless bastards :x
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63


Which one looks most intelligent?

Not the one in the top center.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
The Media's Labor Day Revolution
Russ Baker
September 06, 2005


Investigative reporter and essayist Russ Baker is a longtime contributor to TomPaine.com. He is the founder of the Real News Project, a new organization dedicated to producing groundbreaking investigative journalism. He can be reached at russ@russbaker.com.

The magnitude of the Hurricane Katrina disaster and the media’s astonished—and astonishingly vigorous— response puts in perspective how hard it has generally become, in this country, to deliver the unadorned, unapologetic truth. Indeed, for at least as long as George Bush has been in office, the great unspoken challenge for mainstream journalists has been to do one’s job while keeping one’s job.

As the Bush organization has flipped one lever after another of a vast and well-fueled propaganda machine, it is has become ever more difficult for reporters to render useful, accurate information to the public without neutering it in the cop-out “on the one hand, on the other” format. Constant pressure from the White House is one challenge. Another is from corporate bosses who must produce untenable profit growth while maintaining friendly relations with the federal government.

One of the most tricky work environments surely must be the Fox News Network, Rupert Murdoch’s vehicle for dispensing highly opinionated, fact-light ‘news’ in the guise of helping provide Americans with “Fair and Balanced” journalism. And so it was with a sense of wonder that I viewed a clip of an exchange between two of Fox’s stars, Shepard Smith and Geraldo Rivera, and hard-core propagandist talk show host Sean Hannity, who had morphed into the role of anchorman for a “Fox News Alert”.

If you have broadband Internet access, you owe it to yourself to watch this exchange , which aired Friday night. Smith, Fox’s principal news anchor, and Rivera, its high-priced celebrity gunslinger, reported in from the scene of devastation in New Orleans. Smith and Rivera, both usually loyal to Fox’s rigidly pro-administration line, yell, cry (Geraldo) and generally register disgust as Hannity seeks to gild the Bush administration’s glacial response to the crisis. Here are a few choice excerpts:

SMITH: They won't let them walk out of the…convention center. .. they've locked them in there. The government said, "You go here, and you'll get help," or, "You go in that Superdome and you'll get help."

And they didn't get help. They got locked in there. And they watched people being killed around them. And they watched people starving. And they watched elderly people not get any medicine…..

And they've set up a checkpoint. And anyone who walks up out of that city now is turned around. You are not allowed to go to Gretna, Louisiana, from New Orleans, Louisiana. Over there, there's hope. Over there, there's electricity. Over there, there is food and water. But you cannot go from there to there. The government will not allow you to do it. It's a fact.

HANNITY: All right, Shep, I want to get some perspective here, because earlier today...

SMITH: That is perspective! That is all the perspective you need!

Soon, Hannity switches to Geraldo, where he finds no relief:

RIVERA (holding aloft a baby): Sean…I want everyone in the world to see, six days after Katrina swept through this city, five days after the levee collapsed, this baby—this baby—how old is this baby?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Ten months old…..

RIVERA: Look in the face of the baby. This is it. This is it. No sugar coating, no political spin, no Republicans or Democrats. People suffering.

Let them go. Let them out of here. Let them go. Let them walk over this damn interstate, and let them out of here.

HANNITY: All right. Thanks, Geraldo. Appreciate it. We appreciate—and from New Orleans tonight.

For once, Hannity was nearly speechless. His mandate—and preferences—were clear: Keep Fox’s viewers, Bush’s vaunted base, steady, until the administration spin machine could be shoved on top of the volatile events that threatened to expose the horrible truth about the priorities and competencies of this White House after an unprecedented, years-long free ride.

When Fox reporters are the most emphatically critical of the Bush administration, you know something is going on. Had Roger Ailes decided that it was simply impossible to ride out this storm with Bush? What of the defections of The New York Times’ conservative columnist David Brooks and others in recent days? Perhaps they figure that this is simply too enormous a screw-up to defend, and hope that by joining the ranks of the indignant they may escape a sinking ship. Or, maybe, maybe, even they have finally had enough.

Another remarkable breakthrough came Sunday, on Meet the Press , Tim Russert freshened his typical beltway bonhomie mix with a “real” person, Jefferson Parish President (i.e., county manager) Aaron Broussard. His guest, who, by the way, is white, delivered a startlingly blunt indictment of the federal response to the death and destruction facing the largely poor, black population that had been unable to get out.

BROUSSARD: ..[T]he aftermath of Hurricane Katrina will go down as one of the worst abandonments of Americans on American soil ever in U.S. history. …Why did it happen? Who needs to be fired? And believe me, they need to be fired right away, because we still have weeks to go in this tragedy. We have months to go. We have years to go. And whoever is at the top of this totem pole, that totem pole needs to be chain-sawed off and we've got to start with some new leadership.

RUSSERT: Shouldn't the mayor of New Orleans and the governor of New Orleans bear some responsibility?

BROUSSARD: Sir, they were told like me, every single day, "The cavalry's coming," on a federal level, "The cavalry's coming, the cavalry's coming, the cavalry's coming." I have just begun to hear the hoofs of the cavalry. The cavalry's still not here yet, but I've begun to hear the hoofs, and we're almost a week out.

…We had Wal-Mart deliver three trucks of water, trailer trucks of water. FEMA turned them back. They said we didn't need them. This was a week ago. …we had 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel on a Coast Guard vessel docked in my parish. The Coast Guard said, "Come get the fuel right away." When we got there with our trucks, they got a word. "FEMA says don't give you the fuel." Yesterday—yesterday—FEMA comes in and cuts all of our emergency communication lines. They cut them without notice….

...The guy who runs…emergency management…His mother was trapped in St. Bernard nursing home and every day she called him and said, "Are you coming, son? Is somebody coming?" And he said, "Yeah, Mama, somebody's coming to get you. Somebody's coming to get you on Tuesday. Somebody's coming to get you on Wednesday. Somebody's coming to get you on Thursday. Somebody's coming to get you on Friday." And she drowned Friday night. [Broussard was sobbing at this point]

… Nobody's coming to get us. Nobody's coming to get us. The secretary has promised. Everybody's promised. They've had press conferences. I'm sick of the press conferences. For God sakes, shut up and send us somebody.

RUSSERT: Just take a pause, Mr. [Broussard]. While you gather yourself in your very emotional times, I understand, let me go to Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi.

And there we were, back in the bad old days. Russert had no tasteful way to note that Barbour had been GOP chairman in the mid-90s, a key strategist and fundraiser for the transformation of American government into a one-party state for the interests of the rich, and the dismantlement of the safety net, that, among other things, is supposed to protect all Americans from the most extreme ravages of natural disaster and daily life alike. Or to ask hard questions about Barbour’s avid support for Bush’s Iraqi war, and its unusual overseas deployment of National Guard units that properly should have been in place in the Gulf region to provide relief and order in case of emergency. It’s hard to point this out when you work for NBC, a unit of General Electric, a huge defense contractor that has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of Bush administration priorities and policy.

Fixing journalism’s deep structural deficiencies will take more than the Labor Day Revolt. Getting it right means more than expressing momentary indignation, however heartfelt, or reporting on the current crisis as if the important thing was how the disaster is affecting the administration’s “approval” rating. Because it’s not the administration’s spin with which we need to concern ourselves. It is the media’s long, long sleep in the face of mounting evidence that Bush and his team are not only ideologues seriously out of touch with the American public but grievously incompetent managers of the nation’s commitments, resources and people.

As we take stock of the true costs of the failures surrounding Katrina, journalists should note their own role as collaborators. We, too, have been complicit in this.


the entire shady bunch.......should be excised from the oval office ASAP...... and replaced with a temporary (interim gov't) until all this is sorted out and the trash is all weeded out . The problem could take a long time as it is now systemic......permeating right down to the US population.....who is complicit in this disaster too. The "people" have been aware of bush's decisions and the short cuts he took. How he transfered resources from the New Orleans repair funds to HIS G*D damned invasion of Iraq.......( which was NOT critical. essential.......no matter how much the bastard lies about it. )....... and the "people" simply looked away......or supported this SOB .

This is the straw that broke the camels back for me....... and there is little this savage bunch can do to redeem themselves. (and btw: they are the most SAVAGE bunch of SOB s that walk the planet now. They just disguise their savagery with cosmetic language....... which their media spews out for the sheeple. .

what "we" are seeing is the "real american dream". The rich get richer and the poor are left to drown.

Stay tuned for Halliburton To grab all the "reconstruction" contracts for this disaster area....... (gotta keep all the money in one happy unethical tight little "family" now, don't they?? ----- :twisted: :evil: :twisted: ( the Mafia has nothing on these bozos.... :evil: :x
 

Martin Le Acadien

Electoral Member
Sep 29, 2004
454
0
16
Province perdue du Canada, Louisian
FYI-Jefferson Parish Broussard is a Distant Cousin, His ancestor figured quite prominately in Canadian History,
Beausoliel Brousard who led the resistance to the Grand Derangement and did not surrender to the British Authorities in Nova Scotia until 1764 when the Treaty of Paris ended the last French and Indian War. Sent to New Orleans, he died in 1766 and left 2 sons from whom all the Broussards in Louisiana are descended.

Rebel to the END.

Jefferson Parish has a large Acadien Population right next to New Orleans.

Give'em hell Pres. Broussard.