Nazi Twitter

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Which you failed to do.
You never do any research outside of your own little box.

Leaving a tweet declaring Israel's final solution untouched but flagging a tweet that says mass mailing voting cards leads to fraud and when the looting starts the shooting starts is failing? OK, carry on, oh btw:

While Twitter Confronts Trump, Zuckerberg Keeps Facebook Out of It

Jack Dorsey, chief executive of Twitter, took to his site not long after to say Twitter would not back down, presenting a stark contrast to Mr. Zuckerberg, who, in an interview a day earlier with Fox News, said Facebook wasn’t going to judge Mr. Trump’s posts.
“We’ve been pretty clear on our policy that we think that it wouldn’t be right for us to do fact checks for politicians,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. “I think in general, private companies probably shouldn’t be — or especially these platform companies — shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”

“Zuckerberg’s instincts have been right,” said Brendan Carr, a Republican commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission. “Zuckerberg said, ‘We trust people to make up their minds.’”
But Mr. Zuckerberg’s hands-off approach to Mr. Trump’s increasingly incendiary behavior on social media runs the risk of alienating some users who think the rules about what can be posted to Facebook should be applied equally to everyone, including world leaders. It could also infuriate some of the company’s Silicon Valley work force, who still believe Facebook isn’t doing enough to counter misinformation campaigns.

“I’m filing a complaint with the Federal Election Commission because of Twitter’s domestic election interference against President @realDonaldTrump,” Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida said in a tweet.
After Twitter applied the warning label on a tweet from Mr. Trump on Friday morning, Ajit Pai, the F.C.C. chairman, called on Twitter to apply its rules against inciting violence equally to other world leaders. He provided a link to to anti-Israel tweets from Iran’s supreme leader.
Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, retweeted Mr. Pai’s post and called for criminal action against Twitter.
“Exactly, @AjitPaiFCC. That’s why today I called on AG Barr & @stevenmnuchin1 to open a criminal investigation into @Twitter.”
That kind of confrontation is exactly what Mr. Zuckerberg, who controls a far larger internet megaphone than Mr. Dorsey, wants to avoid. In a speech at Georgetown University in October 2019, Mr. Zuckerberg declared that political speech would be protected on Facebook, including lies made by politicians on the site.

Despite what he called his own “visceral negative reaction” to Mr. Trump’s language, Mr. Zuckerberg said he felt compelled to keep the posts up on Facebook and Instagram, and that the president’s language did not violate the company’s policies.
“I know many people are upset that we’ve left the President’s posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers spelled out in clear policies,” Mr. Zuckerberg wrote.
“ I disagree strongly with how the President spoke about this,” he continued, “but I believe people should be able to see this for themselves, because ultimately accountability for those in positions of power can only happen when their speech is scrutinized out in the open.”
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,317
4,024
113
Edmonton
"Intended" by whom?
By the way, the crazy fat kid keeps telling us how rich he is. Why doesn't he set up his own social media company? He's a businessman, ain't he?
Oh, right. Doesn't want to compete with Stormfront.


You're a lawyer - you figure it out! Geesh!
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,326
9,516
113
Washington DC
I wonder why only two? Are the rest of you looter supporters?
Because, of course, anybody who doesn't want looters to be extrajudicially murdered must be "looter supporters."

Including the Commie Antifa Kenyan Muslim socialist Deep State Hillary Supreme Court that decided Tennessee v. Garner in 1985.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Because, of course, anybody who doesn't want looters to be extrajudicially murdered must be "looter supporters."

Including the Commie Antifa Kenyan Muslim socialist Deep State Hillary Supreme Court that decided Tennessee v. Garner in 1985.




How nice! T-bonesforbrains offers us MORE LIES about cops and robbers!
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Boomer and Moosie hate it when private companies do as they please with their property.




Oh dear me! LIE-beral civil rights at their MOST CONVOLUTED!


For instance - taxi drivers are ALL considered to be SELF EMPLOYED - courtesy of LIE-beral labour laws!


LIE-berals think it is a GOOD IDEA to allow taxi companies to pay drivers those CRAP WAGES!


In part because so many drivers are immigrants that LIE-berals have selected for us - whose votes LIE-berals HOPE TO BUY!


Thus LOW TAXI RATES makeit easier and more convenient for us to use them!



And because LIE-berals believe that taxi drivers offer a SOCIAL SERVICE - meaning they cart around the weak of mind, the frail of


body, the morally bent among us such as hookers and drunks and drug addicts!


If LIE-berals had not arranged things so that taxi drivers COULD BE EXPLOITED - then all those weak and frail and sick



and morally bent people and DRUNK people would either get behind the wheel of some old junker car and maybe crash!


Or they would CLAMOUR FOR MORE AND BETTER PUBLIC TRANSIT - that LIE-berals ARE TOO CHEAP TO PAY FOR!


Even though LIE-berals have been DEMANDING FOR YEARS - that we USE their over loaded. slow and not terrible reliable



public transit!



And of course - AS OUR "BOOMING ECONOMY" sank ever deeper into debt - up to 2019



LIE-berals NEEDED SOME SOLUTION to the falling living standard of our middle class! By which I mean THE REAL MIDDLE



CLASS and NOT the civil service union HOGS who are masquerading as middle class!



Thus LIE-berrals allowed the Uber and Lyft ride share solution - in what amounts to a PUBLIC ADMISSION BY LIE-berals


that our standard of living is SLIPPING AND OUR TAXES ARE TOO HIGH aqnd that regular people need more income !


By allowing Uber and the competition into Canada - LIE-berals have allowed people to earn a little more money - WITH A LITTLE

LESS TAX on it since they can claim various car costs as biz expenses!


ALWAYS CONNIVING LIE-berals are ROBBING taxi drivers in order to reward Uber drivers! It is TYPICAL LIE-beral



ROB Peter to pay Paul LIE-beral thinking!


The average taxi driver makes so little money they are basically EXEMPT from paying income tax!


And of course taxi drivers routinely pocket cash so that income goes unreported - while Uber and Lyft have computer records



that are much harder to deny! Thus LIE-berals pick up a little more income tax from Uber drivers than from taxi drivers!



The Uber driver is generally holding down a more or less full time job or doing one or two part time jobs as well as doing



those Uber shifts! Thus the middle class driver BOTH makes more money and pays more taxes on the extra income!


Is it not ironic that LIE-berals CHOSE to allow so many taxi drivers to immigrate and then turned around and SCREWED THEM


by allowing Uber to operate simply so LIE-berals could pick up a little MORE GRAVY!


There is NO FRIEND SO FICKLE AS A LIE-beral as taxi drivers are finding out!