National Geographic acknowledges past racist coverage

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I guess everyone has to jump on the bandwagon. Someone is making a fortune handing out whips. Self flagellation is in, I guess. I never thought of NG as being racist. They just produced high quality nudey pix.
---

National Geographic acknowledges past racist coverage
Letter titled, 'For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It'
- Associated Press



National Geographic acknowledged on Monday that it covered the world through a racist lens for generations, with its magazine portrayals of bare-breasted women and naive brown-skinned tribesmen as savage, unsophisticated and unintelligent.

"We had to own our story to move beyond it," editor-in-chief Susan Goldberg told The Associated Press in an interview about the yellow-bordered magazine's April issue, which is devoted to race.

National Geographic first published its magazine in 1888. An investigation conducted last fall by University of Virginia photography historian John Edwin Mason showed that until the 1970s, it virtually ignored people of colour in the United States who were not domestics or labourers, and it reinforced repeatedly the idea that people of colour from foreign lands were "exotics, famously and frequently unclothed, happy hunters, noble savages — every type of cliché."

The rest here.

National Geographic acknowledges past racist coverage - Technology & Science - CBC News

I hope that they don't stop studying other peoples of the world. How are teens like Flossy going to learn about anatomy?
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
I guess everyone has to jump on the bandwagon. Someone is making a fortune handing out whips. Self flagellation is in, I guess. I never thought of NG as being racist. They just produced high quality nudey pix.
---

National Geographic acknowledges past racist coverage
Letter titled, 'For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It'
- Associated Press



National Geographic acknowledged on Monday that it covered the world through a racist lens for generations, with its magazine portrayals of bare-breasted women and naive brown-skinned tribesmen as savage, unsophisticated and unintelligent.

"We had to own our story to move beyond it," editor-in-chief Susan Goldberg told The Associated Press in an interview about the yellow-bordered magazine's April issue, which is devoted to race.

National Geographic first published its magazine in 1888. An investigation conducted last fall by University of Virginia photography historian John Edwin Mason showed that until the 1970s, it virtually ignored people of colour in the United States who were not domestics or labourers, and it reinforced repeatedly the idea that people of colour from foreign lands were "exotics, famously and frequently unclothed, happy hunters, noble savages — every type of cliché."

The rest here.

National Geographic acknowledges past racist coverage - Technology & Science - CBC News

I hope that they don't stop studying other peoples of the world. How are teens like Flossy going to learn about anatomy?

National Geographic was a staple in our household when I was growing up, Murph. We treasured every edition and kept them in mint condition no matter how many times we re-read certain articles. NG provided generations of people with a window on worlds they might never see or otherwise know existed. I found them a great help when it came to writing history and geography papers in school. Haven't read one in years. Not since I subscribed to BBC Earth and numerous other natural history channels. I doubt I will ever read one again now that is has seemingly gone all PC.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I used to get a 1 yr subscription every year for Christmas from when I was 10 until I turned 18.

The articles that interested me were always well written and the photography was stunning. It wasn't cheap to produce that magazine.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
I used to get a 1 yr subscription every year for Christmas from when I was 10 until I turned 18.

The articles that interested me were always well written and the photography was stunning. It wasn't cheap to produce that magazine.

It was first class all the way, Murph. Even the paper they chose for the mag was of a higher quality than most other magazines of the time - even Life which was another favorite - never quite measured up to that of Nat Geo.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
You can still get subscriptions cheap. About $25 CDN a year. Or get the digital version.

I might get a subscription for my grandson. The online one. :)
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,150
9,431
113
Washington DC
National Geographic was a staple in our household when I was growing up, Murph. We treasured every edition and kept them in mint condition no matter how many times we re-read certain articles. NG provided generations of people with a window on worlds they might never see or otherwise know existed. I found them a great help when it came to writing history and geography papers in school. Haven't read one in years. Not since I subscribed to BBC Earth and numerous other natural history channels. I doubt I will ever read one again now that is has seemingly gone all PC.

Admitting to racial bias in the past is PC?

Umm. . . that'd make the KKK and the Nazis PC.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
it must have been discouraging to go back through the old issues and see the racism in what was attempting to be a scientific journal.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Do you use them in school, Flossy? They are excellent research journals. Or perhaps you just look for pictures of naked girls. Or boys. It is 2018.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,104
113
B.C.
National Geographic was a staple in our household when I was growing up, Murph. We treasured every edition and kept them in mint condition no matter how many times we re-read certain articles. NG provided generations of people with a window on worlds they might never see or otherwise know existed. I found them a great help when it came to writing history and geography papers in school. Haven't read one in years. Not since I subscribed to BBC Earth and numerous other natural history channels. I doubt I will ever read one again now that is has seemingly gone all PC.
Yes we recently cancelled our subscription due to the constant reference to global warming and climate change , spaced between ads for drug companies .