NASA Wants to Build a Magnetic Shield Around Mars

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
NASA Wants to Build a Magnetic Shield Around Mars

Shielding the Red Planet

This week, NASA’s Planetary Science Division (PSD) hosted a community workshop at their headquarters in Washington, DC. Known as the “Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop“, this event ran from February 27th to March 1st, and saw scientists and researchers from all over the world descend on the capitol to attend panel discussions, presentations, and talks about the future of space exploration.

One of the more intriguing presentations took place on Wednesday, March 1st, where the exploration of Mars by human astronauts was discussed. In the course of the talk, which was titled “A Future Mars Environment for Science and Exploration“, Director Jim Green discussed how deploying a magnetic shield could enhance Mars’ atmosphere and facilitate crewed missions there in the future.

The current scientific consensus is that, like Earth, Mars once had a magnetic field that protected its atmosphere. Roughly 4.2 billion years ago, this planet’s magnetic field suddenly disappeared, which caused Mars’ atmosphere to slowly be lost to space. Over the course of the next 500 million years, Mars went from being a warmer, wetter environment to the cold, uninhabitable place we know today.



This theory has been confirmed in recent years by orbiters like the ESA’s Mars Express and NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN Mission (MAVEN), which have been studying the Martian atmosphere since 2004 and 2014, respectively. In addition to determining that solar wind was responsible for depleting Mars’ atmosphere, these probes have also been measuring the rate at which it is still being lost today.

Without this atmosphere, Mars will continue to be a cold, dry place where life cannot flourish. In addition to that, future crewed mission – which NASA hopes to mount by the 2030s – will also have to deal with some severe hazards. Foremost among these will be exposure to radiation and the danger of asphyxiation, which will pose an even greater danger to colonists (should any attempts at colonization be made).

In answer to this challenge, Dr. Jim Green – the Director of NASA’s Planetary Science Division – and a panel of researchers presented an ambitious idea. In essence, they suggested that by positioning a magnetic dipole shield at the Mars L1 Lagrange Point, an artificial magnetosphere could be formed that would encompass the entire planet, thus shielding it from solar wind and radiation.

Naturally, Green and his colleagues acknowledged that the idea might sounds a bit “fanciful”. However, they were quick to emphasize how new research into miniature magnetospheres (for the sake of protecting crews and spacecraft) supports this concept:

“This new research is coming about due to the application of full plasma physics codes and laboratory experiments. In the future it is quite possible that an inflatable structure(s) can generate a magnetic dipole field at a level of perhaps 1 or 2 Tesla (or 10,000 to 20,000 Gauss) as an active shield against the solar wind.”



In addition, the positioning of this magnetic shield would ensure that the two regions where most of Mars’ atmosphere is lost would be shielded. In the course of the presentation, Green and the panel indicated that these the major escape channels are located, “over the northern polar cap involving higher energy ionospheric material, and 2) in the equatorial zone involving a seasonal low energy component with as much as 0.1 kg/s escape of oxygen ions.”

To test this idea, the research team – which included scientists from Ames Research Center, the Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Colorado, Princeton University, and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory – conducted a series of simulations using their proposed artificial magnetosphere. These were run at the Coordinated Community Modeling Center (CCMC), which specializes in space weather research, to see what the net effect would be.

New Opportunities for Exploration

What they found was that a dipole field positioned at Mars L1 Lagrange Point would be able to counteract solar wind, such that Mars’ atmosphere would achieve a new balance. At present, atmospheric loss on Mars is balanced to some degree by volcanic outpassing from Mars interior and crust. This contributes to a surface atmosphere that is about 6 mbar in air pressure (less than 1% that at sea level on Earth).

As a result, Mars atmosphere would naturally thicken over time, which lead to many new possibilities for human exploration and colonization. According to Green and his colleagues, these would include an average increase of about 4 °C (~7 °F), which would be enough to melt the carbon dioxide ice in the northern polar ice cap. This would trigger a greenhouse effect, warming the atmosphere further and causing the water ice in the polar caps to melt.



By their calculations, Green and his colleagues estimated that this could lead to 1/7th of Mars’ oceans – the ones that covered it billions of years ago – to be restored. If this is beginning to sound a bit like a lecture on how to terraform Mars, it is probably because these same ideas have been raised by people who advocating that very thing. But in the meantime, these changes would facilitate human exploration between now and mid-century.

“A greatly enhanced Martian atmosphere, in both pressure and temperature, that would be enough to allow significant surface liquid water would also have a number of benefits for science and human exploration in the 2040s and beyond,” said Green. “Much like Earth, an enhanced atmosphere would: allow larger landed mass of equipment to the surface, shield against most cosmic and solar particle radiation, extend the ability for oxygen extraction, and provide “open air” greenhouses to exist for plant production, just to name a few.”

These conditions, said Green and his colleagues, would also allow for human explorers to study the planet in much greater detail. It would also help them to determine the habitability of the planet, since many of the signs that pointed towards it being habitable in the past (i.e. liquid water) would slowly seep back into the landscape. And if this could be achieved within the space of few decades, it would certainly help pave the way for colonization.

In the meantime, Green and his colleagues plan to review the results of these simulations so they can produce a more accurate assessment of how long these projected changes would take. It also might not hurt to conduct some cost-assessments of this magnetic shield. While it might seem like something out of science fiction, it doesn’t hurt to crunch the numbers!

https://futurism.com/nasa-wants-to-build-a-magnetic-shield-around-mars/
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Uh.....yeah. So humans think they can build a contraption equal to the power of a spinning planetary core, and get it to another planet.
I think maybe they should figure out how the hell to get humans or any organic material from here to Mars without them being "nuked" by solar radiation first. Current rocket engine technology is not sufficient to launch a vehicle from earth that's heavy enough to withstand interplanetary travel. And the techs they do have in the pipeline aren't really something you want to use for Earth based launches in case there's a catastrophic failure at launch, as has been known to happen.

I think it also ill behooves us to try this without practicing on the moon first. At least if something goes wrong on the moon, there's still some chance at saving the people there. We should make sure we know how to live off-world in a hostile environment close by and work out any bugs before making the big commitment on Mars.

However, I don't believe we are destined to be an interplanetary species. I think our hubris sometimes makes us think we're smarter or more than we really are.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,042
3,605
113
since the moon is closer perhaps the moon should be terraformed first. :) :cool:
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,543
9,612
113
Washington DC
Uh.....yeah. So humans think they can build a contraption equal to the power of a spinning planetary core, and get it to another planet.
Umm. . . no. Maybe you should read the article.

I think maybe they should figure out how the hell to get humans or any organic material from here to Mars without them being "nuked" by solar radiation first. Current rocket engine technology is not sufficient to launch a vehicle from earth that's heavy enough to withstand interplanetary travel. And the techs they do have in the pipeline aren't really something you want to use for Earth based launches in case there's a catastrophic failure at launch, as has been known to happen.
Working on it. Mission planned for 2030.

I think it also ill behooves us to try this without practicing on the moon first. At least if something goes wrong on the moon, there's still some chance at saving the people there. We should make sure we know how to live off-world in a hostile environment close by and work out any bugs before making the big commitment on Mars.
A decent space station and the Moon are the obvious first two steps. But the U.S. never had a crewed space program. It had a series of stunts.

However, I don't believe we are destined to be an interplanetary species. I think our hubris sometimes makes us think we're smarter or more than we really are.
For example, some of us think in terms of "destiny."
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Uh.....yeah. So humans think they can build a contraption equal to the power of a spinning planetary core, and get it to another planet.
I think maybe they should figure out how the hell to get humans or any organic material from here to Mars without them being "nuked" by solar radiation first. Current rocket engine technology is not sufficient to launch a vehicle from earth that's heavy enough to withstand interplanetary travel. And the techs they do have in the pipeline aren't really something you want to use for Earth based launches in case there's a catastrophic failure at launch, as has been known to happen.

I think it also ill behooves us to try this without practicing on the moon first. At least if something goes wrong on the moon, there's still some chance at saving the people there. We should make sure we know how to live off-world in a hostile environment close by and work out any bugs before making the big commitment on Mars.

However, I don't believe we are destined to be an interplanetary species. I think our hubris sometimes makes us think we're smarter or more than we really are.

Basic physics will probably prevent us from becoming a planetary species, as sub-light travel is likely all that is possible. I suppose that we could travel the vastness of space as frozen embryos, nurtured into adulthood at the other end by automatic machinery. If we start now, we can colonize the nearest interstellar systems in 10,000 years or so.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
Umm. . . no. Maybe you should read the article.
Ummmm...maybe you should try reading it.
In essence, they suggested that by positioning a magnetic dipole shield at the Mars L1 Lagrange Point, an artificial magnetosphere could be formed that would encompass the entire planet, thus shielding it from solar wind and radiation.
Again, this shield would have to produce the kind of power a spinning planetary core generates.

Working on it. Mission planned for 2030.
Uh huh. And they're going to have an interplanetary spacecraft built in orbit in the next 12-13 years? Because I'll tell you right now, there is no way any craft is going to be able to lift off from earth with the heavy shielding required by using chemical rockets.

A decent space station and the Moon are the obvious first two steps.
Yep, two steps they are obviously skipping. More of that hubris I mentioned earlier. It's kind of like sitting a person at the wheel of an F1 car when the only previous driving experience they had was a few runs at the local go-kart track.

For example, some of us think in terms of "destiny."
And some of us are more realistic and see that as humans we are destined to make the same mistakes over and over again. We tend to think that as a species we're better than we really are.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,543
9,612
113
Washington DC
Uh huh. And they're going to have an interplanetary spacecraft built in orbit in the next 12-13 years? Because I'll tell you right now, there is no way any craft is going to be able to lift off from earth with the heavy shielding required by using chemical rockets.
It's OK. At some point we'll take a Canadian along and y'all can pretend you're contributing to the space program.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Yep, we're going with Soyuz while we tool up and roll out the next generation.

You'll never have a generation.

You do realize that there is little point in every nation building its own rockets. It is far more efficient for Canada to focus on the tech that actually goes into space, such as the Canadarm, a tech the US made use of for several decades and is still using.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,543
9,612
113
Washington DC
You do realize that there is little point in every nation building its own rockets. It is far more efficient for Canada to focus on the tech that actually goes into space, such as the Canadarm, a tech the US made use of for several decades and is still using.
Of course. Canada (and about 203 other countries) would be insane to build their own craft. National pride is great, but spending billions to replicate what's already done would just be stupid.