Does this not sound like a debate about religion where beliefs are based on hearsay and people get really upset when you try to present facts to refute their beliefs. That this subject has become so taboo (being outlawed in some countries) tells me that there is something very fishy about the official position. I have no facts, just a suspicion based on past experience with the thought police.
Who are the brain police?" - Frank Zappa
EXACTLY why Holocaust denial should not be illegal...........
The evidence is simply overwhelming. The documentation....from official reports on the "evacuation" of ghettoes, letters of German soldiers, to eye-witness accounts of both Jews and non-Jews, to over 200 diaries kept by victims, to railroad records, to orders issued , both in the extermination and the cover-up of same, to carefully kept records of Jewish property seized, to letters of non-Jewish villagers and witnesses, to the speeches of Hitler and his henchmen, to census data of Jewish populations before and after the war, to the physical remains of the extermination sites, to the piles and piles of personal belongings there, to witness testimony at hundreds of trials, to Eichmann in Jerusalem, and on and on and on and on ad nauseum...........tons of evidence....
It is easy to make Einsmensch et al, (who depend on the "expertise" of men easily shown to be fraudsters) look like the complete fools they are....or the psychotic loonies, take your pick.