Muslim groups 'troubled' by Stephen Harper's mosque remark

[MHz]

Sending in the military without a formal declaration of war qualifies as a terrorist act. If there is such a declaration of war that exists then the world is the battleground. Does he expect Muslims to stand in one spot while Canadian snipers pop them? That's pretty naive thinking.

Really walnut, a red, don't like the possibility of your glass of scotch getting shot out of your hands? The first of 2 shots.
Welcome to your new home fuker. I have to assume the red is confirmation that this is how all your enemies house should look like walter. You probably go crying to your insurance company if you vehicle get hit with some hail. You creeps all have the same method of handling issues. Do you how fuking retarded that is?

 

[gerryh]

The Taliban invited us in? I don't think so.
Iraq invited us in? I don't think so.
Syria invited us in? I don't think so.
Libya invited us in? I don't think so/-.
Iran invited us to leave in 1979? Yes.

Yes, Iraq requested our assistance.


Libya was a UN sanctioned operation.

 

[MHz]

You creeps sure lie a lot, and badly.
Our last PM with any balls (Jean Chretien) stopped Canada from going into Iraq because he knew 9/11 was bull**** Jean Chretien.

Saudi was in more breeches than Libya was, Libyans were having a blast with all that money, that is why they targeted as well as the planned currency change.

 

[gerryh]

You creeps sure lie a lot, and badly.
Our last PM with any balls (Jean Chretien) stopped Canada from going into Iraq because he knew 9/11 was bull**** Jean Chretien.

No, he knew Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. This sortie into Iraq has nothing to do with Bush's war in Iraq. Do try to keep up. Maybe if you came out of your basement more often than to collect your welfare cheque you might realize it's 2015 not 2003.

 

[MHz]

Like fuk it doesn't, it was made into a hellhole when the US used them in the proxy war against Iran, 1,250,000 needless deaths all over the vanity (and greed) of the West and it was perpetual war ever since. You not going to brag up the deaths of 500,000 child due to sanction on basic necessities of life. How did boomer put it, kill em as kids, saves killing them when they are 17. Real bunch of fuking winners you are, probably bitch and whine if your street isn't plowed within a few days of a storm.
You feel a chilly storm coming your way creep?

You went to 'fix it' right. The change back to oil in dollars, the rest of the country was smashed to bits as a lesson from the new masters. The Dresden insanity after the Nazis added their touch in the 25 years the US allowed the CIA to experiment on Iranians.

Yeah creep, it's all relevant.

 

[pgs]

he is our leader Walter, that means it is incumbent upon him to diffuse not infuse and segregate...he doesn't get to spout off without thinking or make those kinds of slips on public

Well he did just spout off as you say , so I would hazard a guess that he is allowed to .

 

[Walter]

Like fuk it doesn't, it was made into a hellhole when the US used them in the proxy war against Iran, 1,250,000 needless deaths all over the vanity (and greed) of the West and it was perpetual war ever since. You not going to brag up the deaths of 500,000 child due to sanction on basic necessities of life. How did boomer put it, kill em as kids, saves killing them when they are 17. Real bunch of fuking winners you are, probably bitch and whine if your street isn't plowed within a few days of a storm.

I heard it was 3 billion dead.

 

[captain morgan]

Are there other types of groups that people become radicalized over in Canada and pose a thread to Canadian safety?

The FLQ ring a bell?

The Fed gvt had an interesting response to that at the time

Bad drivers. Seriously, theyve killed way more people here than terrorism.

Ladders can be deadly too

Well he did just spout off as you say , so I would hazard a guess that he is allowed to .

The difference is that he didn't spout off about wanting to be more inclusive about the poor, marginalized and misunderstood folks and how we should pity & support them

 

[Twila]

The FLQ ring a bell?

The Fed gvt had an interesting response to that at the time

They haven't been active since 1970. I don't think can be considered a threat to Canada.

 

[captain morgan]

They haven't been active since 1970. I don't think can be considered a threat to Canada.

The examples of a 'National reaction' are not limited just the Harper gvt

 

[Twila]

The examples of a 'National reaction' are not limited just the Harper gvt

oh most definitely.

I couldn't seem to find anything about other radicalized groups or people other then muslim extremists. So if we dont' have other groups active, what he'd said wouldn't have been exclusionary.

 

[captain morgan]

oh most definitely.

I couldn't seem to find anything about other radicalized groups or people other then muslim extremists. So if we dont' have other groups active, what he'd said wouldn't have been exclusionary.

Fair enough, but I see it differently.

Not to split hairs on this, but how do we define 'radicalized'... With that, how does the aforementioned affect the definition of a group?... Can we include an ideology, criminal intent/activity, political extremism?

Depending on how much latitude we apply to the general discussion, we might be able to include select eco groups that used to spike trees with the intent of harming the loggers.

The list can go on indefinitely really

 

[Nuggler]

They haven't been active since 1970. I don't think can be considered a threat to Canada.

"At the time", Twila.

People were wondering which politico or diplomat they were going to kill next.

War Measures Act: "just watch me" ONE of the good things PET did.

The Angry Beavers..

Never mess with an angry beaver................8O
Hell hath no fury like a beaver scorned...........8O

 

[captain morgan]

Never mess with an angry beaver................8O
Hell hath no fury like a beaver scorned...........8O

You young kids and yer fancy language.

Exactly what does one do when scorning a beaver?

 

[Nuggler]

YES!!!!! Treasurer please. what are we going to be radicalized over? taxes? puppies? capris pant length? the oxford comma?

FREE SEX FOR septuagenarians

As good a cause as angry beavers.:lol:

BTW, piddle on the troubled Muzzie groups and Stevo too.


http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j...PgX_g2IqiG-pCY0wOadzKDw&bvm=bv.85076809,d.cWc

Really walnut, a red, don't like the possibility of your glass of scotch getting shot out of your hands? The first of 2 shots.
Welcome to your new home fuker. I have to assume the red is confirmation that this is how all your enemies house should look like walter. You probably go crying to your insurance company if you vehicle get hit with some hail. You creeps all have the same method of handling issues. Do you how fuking retarded that is?

photoshopped.

You young kids and yer fancy language.

Exactly what does one do when scorning a beaver?

Spike his/her tree ?........:glasses3:

 

[MHz]

I heard it was 3 billion dead.

Using your haulacaust math again walnut?

 

[Twila]

Fair enough, but I see it differently.

Not to split hairs on this, but how do we define 'radicalized'... With that, how does the aforementioned affect the definition of a group?... Can we include an ideology, criminal intent/activity, political extremism?

Depending on how much latitude we apply to the general discussion, we might be able to include select eco groups that used to spike trees with the intent of harming the loggers.

The list can go on indefinitely really

oh, this is not splitting hairs. This is getting to an understanding of what words mean, how they're interpreted and what you and I are attempting to communicate. This IS communication.

For how we define radicalized if we go with the dictionary definition of Radical then we're swamped with it and it's not necessarily a bad thing.
Radical | Define Radical at Dictionary.com

Radical:
favoring drastic political, economic, or social reforms:
radical ideas; radical and anarchistic ideologues.

But clearly politician and police are using this word differently. They're implying a criminalization to it. I'd succumbed to their definition of it. So, maybe we are back to good old fashioned terrorists rather then radicalized individuals?

 

[MHz]

photoshopped.

Spike his/her tree ?........:glasses3:

Wow, not one functioning brain in the whole collective. Qualification for choosing which side you cheer for?
You drain the pond.

Not photoshopped but it does show you are an idiot that can't even find Gaza in any search engine. Thanks for admitting if is a pic of destruction.

 

[Sal]

he is our leader Walter, that means it is incumbent upon him to diffuse not infuse and segregate...he doesn't get to spout off without thinking or make those kinds of slips on public

so Walter, your reaction here weakens you considerably. You red me, but have no explanation of why leaving me to conclude your reaction is purely based upon emotion with no logic applied. Thus your support of Harper means in your world he has no accountability and that is precisely why I don't trust the far right....there's zero logic, all emotion, and no accountability for your side.

You guys are the most illogical, emotional, reactive and thus dangerous voters we have.

No wonder our country is messed up.