Fiscal conservatism is not particularly ideological really. A socialist party running on tax increases and making spending increases conditional on paying off the debt is far more fiscon than a conservative party that promises tax cuts without cutting spending or cutting it in all the wrong places.
I like the Swedish model too, which many incorrectly call 'socialist' when in reality it's more of a liberal-corporatist or social-corporatist system, whereby its main focus on democratization of the economy (codetermination laws and such for example, which do not affect govrnment revenue at all).
Actually what's interesting about the Swedish system is that there is in fact no legally mandated minimum wage and in fact never has been, but co-determination legislation ensures that during recessions labour can negotiate fair wage reductions with management requiring management to take wage reductions too. In Canada in bad recessions that's not possible since:
1. Workers have no representation on the board of directors, and
2. We have a legally mandated minimum wage not allowing companies to negotiate wage reductions if necessary.
Ironic, seeing that Sweden is often hailed as a 'socialist' model by many on the left. But again, strictly speaking it's a corporatist state, not a socialist one. And I'm not using 'corporatist' in a negative sence, but rather in reference to the economic ssytem of the same name.
I know about how that works in Germany. Did they get that from Sweden? Germany was the greatest exporter on the planet until last year, when China took over by volume..
Figure that out... Germany, the size and resources it has, the (now second) greatest (unpublicized) exporter of refined, value-added goods in the world...
Taken over in volume by China feeding north Americans stuff on credit such that now north America owes China insane amounts of money for the stuff it bought.
You guys never read Karl Marx's chapters about how to attack Capitalism, did you?
You never read the parts where he said how to use their corrupt (like Wall Street this recession) system against them.
Stalin was too stupid to do it, but you're getting it now.
Question... is it because rats reading economics texts read it and think things are so cool they can count on Uncle Sam to stop them if they go blitzo beyond their ability to comprehend the consequences of their actions.
What gets me is, Alberta used to be the most advanced province for education.
Maybe Alberta has proven nature and why some dumb nuts should be left to dig holes.