Mark Carney (Trudeau Liberal Replacement) as PM

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,309
13,592
113
Low Earth Orbit
View attachment 28285
But they still managed to reserve a spot under that bus for Chandra Arya.
View attachment 28286
View attachment 28287
The campaign, however, did have enough time to brand its tour buses.
Who will see the planes anyway?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,626
10,293
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Who will see the planes anyway?
Not Chandra Arya from under the bus. On Sunday, freshly-minted Prime Minister Mark Carney visited Governor General Mary Simon at Rideau Hall triggering a federal election which will send Canadians to the ballot boxes on April 28.

Parliament that Justin Trudeau prorogue’d in early January is now dissolvedMonday’s previously scheduled return to the House of Commons for actual MPs is now cancelled. Carney, who appeared shaky at his pulpit on the steps of Rideau Hall, has a temporary respite from a skills test in the House against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.

Instead, Carney’s been catapulted into the ultimate test, a federal election shadowed by unresolved questions about his financial assets, possible conflicts of interest, copy-pasting of Conservative policy promises, and the fact he’s yet to attempt negotiations with Trump.

If the polls are to be believed, the Liberals have performed a magic trick. They’ve managed to maintain virtually the same party, taking it from the very dismal 16 per cent popularity to overtaking the Conservatives in the latest Ipsos poll by 42-36, all by replacing their leader with another handpicked by the first.

Nanos Research pollster Nik Nanos has suggested this fight between the Liberals and Conservatives will be akin to “a knife fight in a telephone booth.” There was some speculation that this telephone booth might be located in Edmonton Centre, a riding that if Carney chose to run in, could have signalled affinity for Alberta, but he didn’t.

(Much ado was made of Carney, who is from Edmonton, making a hometown comeback. He participated in an on-ice activity with the Oilers before a game on Thursday. On the social media platform X, Carney shared a polished campaign video of himself in an Oilers jersey with the number 24, nodding to the fact that he’s the 24th prime minister, skating on the ice and hanging out in the team’s dressing room)

Internal polling must have suggested this wasn’t Carney’s best shot, because we now know he’ll be running in Nepean, ON., where (where, until two days ago, an actual Liberal MP was campaigning in his home riding) there he will face off with Conservative MP candidate Barbara Bal, a staff sergeant who’s been in law enforcement for over 27 years and has received a police exemplary service medal.

Of course, the bigger fight is with Poilievre, whose policies Carney has, for the most part, copy and pasted. And Sunday’s announcement of the election was no exception. Poilievre has promised to cut income taxes, and on Sunday, Carney pledged to reduce income tax in the lowest bracket by one per cent up to $57,375, leading to a savings of about $825 per year for a two income family.

Poilievre promised to axe the consumer carbon tax. Up until recently, the Liberals attacked him endlessly for this. Carney has since reduced it to zero. It is not actually cancelled, despite claims by the Liberal party. That would require legislation, so the tax is still officially on the books.

Poilievre promised to scrap both the consumer and the industrial carbon tax, preferring to use tax credits to reward companies that lower emissions. In other words, unlike Carney, he’s chosen to use positive rather than negative incentives.

Poilievre promised to speed up approvals for energy projects. Mark Carney recently promised the same, saying he’d create a “one-window” approval process, but failed to explain what he’d do about the Liberals existing regulatory regime that has spooked investors up until now, leading to projects being cancelled.

Carney’s been caught speaking out of both sides of his mouth, depending on the language being used and where he’s located, making him an ideal replacement for Justin Trudeau.

Carney wrote in his 2021 book Value(s) that 80 per cent of fossil fuels need to remain in the ground to meet 2050 net-zero targets, saying even Greta Thunberg could do the math. Does this seem like someone who will be interested in pipelines?

Poilievre said he’d reverse the Liberal’s proposed capital gains tax hike from 50 to 66.7 per cent. Mark Carney has cancelled the capital gains tax increase. Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V.

It goes on & on like this, giving us a choice between Poilievre with Conservative policies, or Trudeau’s copy&paste of Carney claiming he’ll invoke most of Poilievre’s actual Conservative policies.

Poilievre promised to actually cap immigration and tie it to housing construction rates. Carney promised a temporary cap immigration until numbers return to pre-pandemic levels. The only problem with that is there was already a housing crisis at that time.

(Carney commented Sunday that the crisis was a post-pandemic issue. This kind of knowledge requires being steeped in Canada, not simply recalling the names of Mr. Dressup’s puppets)
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,626
10,293
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
MONTREAL — If the four main federal political parties want to take part in the TVA network’s head-to-head French-language debate in the upcoming election campaign, they will have to shell out $75,000 each, the Montreal-headquartered broadcaster said Friday.

The Quebecor Media-owned television network says it needs cash to offset the costs of producing the Face-a-Face debate, which is divided into segments pitting one leader against another.
That’s potentially pretty greasy. Carney’s French isn’t great, & having a reason to skip the French debate will help him keep his foot out of his mouth….
Liberal Leader Mark Carney has declined to participate in a French-language debate with the other federal party leaders on TVA, causing the broadcaster to cancel the program.

TVA traditionally hosts a “Face-à-Face” French-language leaders’ debate during federal election campaigns, reaching an average of 1.3 million viewers, according to Quebecor Media, the parent company of TVA.

But not this time.
(…& for Jagmeet he’ll not have to explain to Québécois about the whole non-coalition coalition that definitely wasn’t a coalition-type coalition that dragged out from the Ottawa Parking Shenanigans to a couple months ago)
“Mr. Carney ... looks forward to participating in the Leaders’ Debate Commission debates, which were confirmed today for April 16 and 17 in Montreal,” said Liberal Party spokesperson Guillaume Bertrand.
…& they can both say they’re dodging that because of their strong principles.🤥
1742862423936.jpeg
The party did not explain why he would not participate in TVA’s debate. A source, speaking on background, said there was a reluctance to pay for the event.🤥

Dude had no problem whatsoever pissing away half million dollars to run to Europe to check the mail & feed the cat in his first 9 days in a caretaker position without actually being elected by the Canadian population…but this is about principles now I’m sure.

Earlier Monday, Carney had responded in the affirmative to a Radio-Canada reporter who asked whether he would participate in TVA’s debate.🤔

“Why not?” he responded in French. “Yes, yes. There will be debates between the leaders and all the leaders. ... For all the debates you have to have all the leaders.” Except for the ones that don’t meet the criteria, two out of three points, etc…🤫

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was quick to criticize Carney’s move. “The Liberals want to be re-elected for a fourth term, but their leader is too afraid to debate me in French,” reads Poilievre’s post on X. “If Mark Carney is too fragile to debate other leaders, how can he stand up to Donald Trump?”

The Bloc Québécois and NDP said Carney’s move was anti-Quebec. “The Liberal leader claims to have the strength and courage to confront Donald Trump, but he doesn’t even have the courage to come and speak to Quebecers. He disqualifies himself, and Quebecers will pass judgment without appeal,” said Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet.

NDP deputy leader Alexandre Boulerice said it was “very insulting to Quebec” and that “no matter what excuse he gives, the truth is that Mark Carney prefers to hide and not answer questions in French.”

All of the main party leaders are still expected to participate in the official debates to be held in Montreal at Maison de Radio-Canada on April 16 and 17, the Leaders’ Debates Commission announced on Monday.

The French debate will be at 8 p.m. on Wednesday, April 16 and the English debate at 7 p.m. on Thursday, April 17.

The Leaders’ Debates Commission is an independent public body mandated to organize two leaders’ debates in each federal general election, one in each official language “while paying special attention to Canada’s Indigenous languages,” according to a statement by the commission.

The commission will announce which leaders will be invited to participate in the debates on April Fools Day because…why not?
Maybe they’ll just have to recall Parliament and have the debate there? Carney can sit in the visitor gallery & they can give him a walkie-talkie to answer over.

“Mr Carney, can you explain why you lied about your involvement in Brookfield moving their offices from Toronto to NYC? Over!”


Oh…even better, they can communicate with them using CB radios, and it all has to be answered in 1970s Smokie & the Bandit CB lingo!! That would be sweet!!!
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,448
2,577
113
Not Chandra Arya from under the bus. On Sunday, freshly-minted Prime Minister Mark Carney visited Governor General Mary Simon at Rideau Hall triggering a federal election which will send Canadians to the ballot boxes on April 28.

Parliament that Justin Trudeau prorogue’d in early January is now dissolvedMonday’s previously scheduled return to the House of Commons for actual MPs is now cancelled. Carney, who appeared shaky at his pulpit on the steps of Rideau Hall, has a temporary respite from a skills test in the House against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.

Instead, Carney’s been catapulted into the ultimate test, a federal election shadowed by unresolved questions about his financial assets, possible conflicts of interest, copy-pasting of Conservative policy promises, and the fact he’s yet to attempt negotiations with Trump.

If the polls are to be believed, the Liberals have performed a magic trick. They’ve managed to maintain virtually the same party, taking it from the very dismal 16 per cent popularity to overtaking the Conservatives in the latest Ipsos poll by 42-36, all by replacing their leader with another handpicked by the first.

Nanos Research pollster Nik Nanos has suggested this fight between the Liberals and Conservatives will be akin to “a knife fight in a telephone booth.” There was some speculation that this telephone booth might be located in Edmonton Centre, a riding that if Carney chose to run in, could have signalled affinity for Alberta, but he didn’t.

(Much ado was made of Carney, who is from Edmonton, making a hometown comeback. He participated in an on-ice activity with the Oilers before a game on Thursday. On the social media platform X, Carney shared a polished campaign video of himself in an Oilers jersey with the number 24, nodding to the fact that he’s the 24th prime minister, skating on the ice and hanging out in the team’s dressing room)

Internal polling must have suggested this wasn’t Carney’s best shot, because we now know he’ll be running in Nepean, ON., where (where, until two days ago, an actual Liberal MP was campaigning in his home riding) there he will face off with Conservative MP candidate Barbara Bal, a staff sergeant who’s been in law enforcement for over 27 years and has received a police exemplary service medal.

Of course, the bigger fight is with Poilievre, whose policies Carney has, for the most part, copy and pasted. And Sunday’s announcement of the election was no exception. Poilievre has promised to cut income taxes, and on Sunday, Carney pledged to reduce income tax in the lowest bracket by one per cent up to $57,375, leading to a savings of about $825 per year for a two income family.

Poilievre promised to axe the consumer carbon tax. Up until recently, the Liberals attacked him endlessly for this. Carney has since reduced it to zero. It is not actually cancelled, despite claims by the Liberal party. That would require legislation, so the tax is still officially on the books.

Poilievre promised to scrap both the consumer and the industrial carbon tax, preferring to use tax credits to reward companies that lower emissions. In other words, unlike Carney, he’s chosen to use positive rather than negative incentives.

Poilievre promised to speed up approvals for energy projects. Mark Carney recently promised the same, saying he’d create a “one-window” approval process, but failed to explain what he’d do about the Liberals existing regulatory regime that has spooked investors up until now, leading to projects being cancelled.

Carney’s been caught speaking out of both sides of his mouth, depending on the language being used and where he’s located, making him an ideal replacement for Justin Trudeau.

Carney wrote in his 2021 book Value(s) that 80 per cent of fossil fuels need to remain in the ground to meet 2050 net-zero targets, saying even Greta Thunberg could do the math. Does this seem like someone who will be interested in pipelines?

Poilievre said he’d reverse the Liberal’s proposed capital gains tax hike from 50 to 66.7 per cent. Mark Carney has cancelled the capital gains tax increase. Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V.

It goes on & on like this, giving us a choice between Poilievre with Conservative policies, or Trudeau’s copy&paste of Carney claiming he’ll invoke most of Poilievre’s actual Conservative policies.

Poilievre promised to actually cap immigration and tie it to housing construction rates. Carney promised a temporary cap immigration until numbers return to pre-pandemic levels. The only problem with that is there was already a housing crisis at that time.

(Carney commented Sunday that the crisis was a post-pandemic issue. This kind of knowledge requires being steeped in Canada, not simply recalling the names of Mr. Dressup’s puppets)
This could be interesting. Caught a FB post that claimed a huge jump in the number of memberships sold by the Conservative Candidate in Carnage's chosen riding. It is entirely possible the Arya backers are not happy with having their chosen representative taken away from them, and plan on showing their displeasure at the polls. Imagine a liberal majority (with or without SIngh's blessing) not having their Prime minister able to sit at the adult's table. Presumably, this would require a freshly minted liberal MP to resign to allow Carnage to run in that riding. At great expense to the taxpayer, of course.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,626
10,293
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Liberal Leader Mark Carney lost the first French-language debate before it even started.

The most-watched French-language network in Quebec organizes a parallel event to the French and English-language debates organized by the Leaders’ Debates Commission, both of which Carney will still attend???

(The only time Carney debated in French was during the Liberal leadership race, where he showed his limitations, accidentally saying that he was “in agreement with Hamas.”)

The Liberal Party of Canada announced its leader will not participate in the all-important French language TVA debate, raising yet another question about his ability to speak to francophones across the country and especially in Quebec.

However, TVA announced a few days ago that it was asking the four main political parties to contribute $75,000 each to participate, due to a lack of funding. Now, the absence of a single party means the debate won’t go ahead…screw him! Run that debate in his absence anyway!

The Bloc Québécois quickly signed the contract and expressed willingness to participate, even though it raised ethical questions. All political parties were reluctant to pay to debate. Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party, however, announced its participation.

Poilievre even challenged Carney to do the same.

“Why not? Yes, yes,” Carney told reporters on Monday. He emphasized that he wanted to participate in the debates with all political parties, including the Green Party. TVA, however, only invited the Liberals, Conservatives, the Bloc Québécois, and the NDP.

“Mr. Carney… looks forward to participating in the Leaders’ Debate Commission debates, which were confirmed today for April 16 and 17 in Montreal,” said Liberal party spokesperson Guillaume Bertrand. The party did not explain why he would not participate. A source, speaking on background, said there was a reluctance to pay for the event.

A few hours later, his team announced that he would not debate on TVA. No Liberal party means there won’t be a debate? Screw that…leave one empty podium and ask it questions…& when there’s no response…play a pre-recorded soundtrack of crickets noises, & carry on. Each question.
(YouTube & Mark Carney moving the Liberals “towards the centre — they’ve moved quite far left”)

Moving the Liberals “towards the centre” by adopting many of the Conservatives positions in the last 10 days…but aren’t the Conservatives suppose to be a ‘wing’ on the political spectrum according to someone or another?🤔
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,626
10,293
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
1742928322686.jpeg
As a veteran of many leaders’ debates, I can say the “Face-à-Face” was easily the most lively and polished. Because in “Face- à -Face,” you actually debate. You have to be on your toes and at the top of your game. Instead of putting the kibosh on it, it should be a model. Debating in the round, facing your opponents. Strong, real, informative.

TVA requested $75,000 from each of the four parties (the Greens have always been excluded from these debates for lack of any seats in Quebec).

TVA had to lay off over 500 staff recently. It’s suffering like all mainstream media. Asking for $300,000 to help fund “the production of the actual debate” (to use the wording of the Commission) may have been unusual, but so are the current circumstances for Canadian media.

The Commission has to put on two debates: one French and one English. TVA was asking for help that amounts to about one-fifth of the cost of each taxpayer supported debate, which rings in at about $1.5 million apiece.

A small side note: they’ve decided that the French debate will take place on April 16 at 8 p.m. in Montreal. If any of the geniuses planning this thing had bothered to ask if that would interfere with any other events in Montreal that evening, they’d have discovered that the final game of the Montreal Canadiens’ regular season was being played at 7 p.m.

(The Habs will be hosting the Carolina Hurricanes. The Canadiens are fighting for a playoff spot and if those hopes are still alive on April 16, guess what folks will be watching?)

The Bloc, the Conservatives and the NDP agreed to the request. On Monday morning, Liberal Leader Mark Carney got a question as to whether or not the Liberals would take part and he said: “Pourquoi pas?” (Why not?). Carney appeared to be on board.

Later in the day, the Liberals sent out notice that they were refusing to take part in the “Face-à-Face” and as a result, TVA said the debate was cancelled…

To try to justify their refusal to take part, the Liberals have offered up a smorgasbord of pretexts that varied from the absence of Green Party Leader Elizabeth May to high sounding principles about not paying journalists.😳

(On May, it’s worth pointing out that she has decided, presumptuously, that her “co-leader” Jonathan Pedneault will represent the Green Party during the debates. How that could actually work is unclear and no other party, to my knowledge, has accepted that a party leader can form a tag team and send in an anointed co-leader to debate for them. Sounds a bit odd and likely won’t be allowed)

Carney’s own stand-in, his Quebec Lieutenant Stephen Guilbeault, tried his own tack. He gave an interview to TVA journalist Paul Larocque that was essentially focused on the money. Larocque, always a model of decorum and restraint, had been scheduled to moderate the “Face-à-Face.” Despite the cancellation, he played it straight with Guilbeault, who seemed to have trouble settling on an excuse. In full rhetorical flight, Guilbeault asked whether politicians would now start getting asked to pay journalists to interview them. It wasn’t pretty.