The answer is We Don't Know What I suspect is the superior lords of the universe
throw us neanderthals from time to time after all Harper is real ain't he
throw us neanderthals from time to time after all Harper is real ain't he
I don't think we need a Lockheed Martin scientist to tell us the obvious.
No it didn't, that's entirely the wrong way to put it. The human and chimpanzee genome have much in common, reflecting a shared ancestry, and we also have much in common, though less, with gorillas and orang utans and so on, for the same reason. It's not chimp DNA, it's primate DNA.
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister![]()
No it didn't, that's entirely the wrong way to put it. The human and chimpanzee genome have much in common, reflecting a shared ancestry, and we also have much in common, though less, with gorillas and orang utans and so on, for the same reason. It's not chimp DNA, it's primate DNA.
I still don't understand why people use DNA to show that we are related to gorillas and chimpanzees. Humans share 50% of their DNA with bananas. By that reckoning, we are all half-bananas.
You're well more than half.
Good point, though, wasn't it?
You, like evey other human being, share around 33% of your DNA with lettuce. That means that YOU are a third wet lettuce.
All this comparing our DNA with chimps is a load of old nonsense.
Humans share up to 98.9% of our DNA with chimpanzees.
And we share 60% of our DNA with fruit flies.
You're a little fruity..
And as meaninglessly annoying as a fly. . .You're a little fruity..
Well, it's true. Using DNA to show how "closely related" we are to another animal means humans are closely related to the fruit fly.
And as meaninglessly annoying as a fly. . .
To anyone who can't grasp the difference between 60% and 98.9%.