List of jobs lost since the Bamster's re-election

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The unemployment rate is meaningless without putting it in the context of the labor force participation rate. The unemployment rate looks better as more people give up looking for work and drop out of the labor force. That's the reason the unemployment rate dropped. Most of the jobs created are minimum wage jobs, not career jobs.
Your emphasis...

correction:

September Jobs Report: US Economy Adding More Full-Time Than Part-Time Jobs

September Jobs Report: US Economy Adding More Full-Time Than Part-Time Jobs

the clearest sign of a reinvigorated economy came buried in the Labor Department's monthly jobs report released Friday: The number of people who said they were working part-time for lack of full-time positions continued to decline in September -- from 7.27 million to 7.1 million -- while full-time jobs increased by 273,000.
Nothing about jobs above minimum wage, just more full time.

and it can also lead to fulfilling careers
Your defence.

And where's your proof for this claim?
Nuff said.

I'm glad you can admit your post was dishonest.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
"dishonest"




 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Still waiting for your "proof" that the report from that site is dishonest...
Were you educated in the UK? I said your post is dishnest, not the report.

... or that my post was intended to mislead anyone in any way
Of course you intended it to be dishonest, I already proved that.

Please do try and keep up. You're beginning to look sillier.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Still waiting for your "proof" that my post was dishonest.
Post #205. I can see why you would want to ignore it.

Or if you were poorly educated or not intelligent, I could understand how you might not understand. Is that the case?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
My post fully answers Baal's mistaken post and it does so effectively. He said most newly created jobs were part time. All the evidence shows otherwise. I am sure he appreciates the correction. There is nothing dishonest in what I posted.


Still waiting for your "proof" of the laughable claim you made.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
My post fully answers Baal's mistaken post and it does so effectively.
Oooh, ok, so you aren't smart enough to understand, OK. I explain it to you.

The only part of Baals post you highlighted was the portion on minimum wage.

You tried to prove that wrong with a report on full time v part time work. Nothing about wages.

He said most newly created jobs were part time.
No, he said minimum wage, I can understand that being as poorly educated as you obviously are, I would have to explain that.

There is nothing dishonest in what I posted.
There is, but only because you aren't very bright.

Still waiting for your "proof" of the laughable claim you made.
It's only laughable to you, because you aren't smart enough to understand. I feel bad for you.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Oh yeah, we're all very sure minimum wages has nothing to do with ''career'' jobs. In fact he also said "I'm not sure that most minimum wage jobs in the new economy have a career path." My link shows full time jobs are being created. It's a good bet many if not most are career path jobs.

Keep trying.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Oh yeah, we're all very sure minimum wages has nothing to do with ''career'' jobs. In fact he also said "I'm not sure that most minimum wage jobs in the new economy have a career path." My link shows full time jobs are being created. It's a good bet many if not most are career path jobs.
You can dance all you want, in a failed attempt to look like you didn't make a serious mistake, but in the end. It's all right here, for all to see...



See YOUR emphasis in Baals quote?

Everyone else does.

Keep trying.
To do what exactly, you're admittedly not bright enough to understand.

It's either that or you were purposely dishonest.

Which is it?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
''serious mistake''

''dishonest''







Bear is always good for a laugh.

(but shhhhhh ... notice that I haven't mentioned him getting banned - still laughing about that as well but we'll keep that a secret)
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
''serious mistake''

''dishonest''
Yes, so which is it?

You aren't bright and didn't understand?

Or...

You were being dishonest?

There are only two choices.

Bear is always good for a laugh.
True, many people find it quite funny when I catch you being dishonest or silly.

(but shhhhhh ... notice that I haven't mentioned him getting banned - still laughing about that as well but we'll keep that a secret)
The irony.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Two choices?

Not really - only one: you are delusional and self obsessed. Small wonder why you keep losing these debates. But they do provide a good laugh.

Oh, the irony.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Two choices?
Look, I understand, I caught you looking foolish, yet again, but yes.

And you keep avoiding them.

You've failed to explain them away with more dishonesty, or unintelligent nonsense.

So some clarity is in order.