Liberal Party A Haven for Terrorists

Status
Not open for further replies.

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
We are not here to debate FOX News Channel, but Canada is a haven for terrorists.

Terrorists are highly intelligent people, and they know how to manipulate the system and they know how to manipulate the Charter of Rights + Freedoms to their benefit.

Canada prides ourselves on such great civil liberties and rights, even on the basis of allowing a man to purchase weapons and send them abroad to a terrorist organization.

Wow, I love it when we stand up for civil liberties and rights!

We are getting of topic from the LPoC, though... CDNbear, take it away.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Again can you show me where we allow this guy to do this? Anything West, besides a reference to an editorial. How am I respond to Canada supposedly being a terrorist or even a terrorist haven without any evidence to show for it?

If you read the rest of my post you can see how I addressed the notion in the OP. I paralleled your story of a terrorist. Then I asked how we can show Mr. Bains has warranted suspension of his rights.
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
**I asked this in another thread what does OP stand for?

I have been searching on the internet for 15 minutes for the article, having trouble with the words to search for.

TV is no different then the online articles, if you have FNC with your digital cable, set your VCR to tape The Special Report repeat in the early midnight, if you need proof.

It was following an investigation, and their was a Vancouver man, who, in the USA's eyes, purchased military-style weapons and sent them to Hezbollah in Lebannon, and Canada does not see this as illegal and will not send the man to the USA to be prosecuted!

TV has the same significance as an online article. If you need proof, you can try Googling the story, you have all the words you need in the above paragraph. I have tried and failed to find it on Google, but I have seen it broadcasted on a cable news channel.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
**I asked this in another thread what does OP stand for?

I have been searching on the internet for 15 minutes for the article, having trouble with the words to search for.

TV is no different then the online articles, if you have FNC with your digital cable, set your VCR to tape The Special Report repeat in the early midnight, if you need proof.

It was following an investigation, and their was a Vancouver man, who, in the USA's eyes, purchased military-style weapons and sent them to Hezbollah in Lebannon, and Canada does not see this as illegal and will not send the man to the USA to be prosecuted!

TV has the same significance as an online article. If you need proof, you can try Googling the story, you have all the words you need in the above paragraph. I have tried and failed to find it on Google, but I have seen it broadcasted on a cable news channel.

OP is original post I believe.

I can't find it either, the difference between print and television is that print is in archives. I don't have FNC, I don't think I can get it wiht my cable provider, so I won't be able to view it without a subscription. So what do I have except for some foreign editorial reference to show how Canada is harbouring a terrorist who fled from America? If you're going to call Canada a terrorist state then I suggest you lean on the Governing Party here in Canada. They are supposed to be tough on terrorism so I'm sure they would have an opinion on the matter, in which case it would be easier for Canadians to find the evidence for this accusation.

You should demand as much as a Canadian. Don't you have a vested interest in what happens here in Canada? Are you a dual citizen? I'm sorry, but your outlook to me is so skewed that I can't help but think you might be. Write your MP and ask questions, unless you like the label we've been given by the Fox Network news.
 

karra

Ranter
Jan 3, 2006
158
3
18
here, there, and everywher
Perhaps Bear - you should have named this thread;

Terrorists - A Haven for the larcenous Liberal Party du Canada

Seems to moi - that would be more in keeping - not to be confused with twinkie lover Max. . . .
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
No seems good to me Karra. Though I know you love that word, allow me to be pedantic and assert that larceny would be more apt if used against those wanting to suspend civil liberties not protect them.
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
Tonington, I am involved in politics.

I write to my local MP (who IS Conservative, Merv Tweed --Brandon-Souris) and I have written to him multiple times.

And, if I find a source, I will email his office with my complaint.

I actually emailed him last month on an issue with the CRTC and Super-Bowl.

I am not lazy in politics, so don't take me as one of those people who complain and does nothing about it.
 

karra

Ranter
Jan 3, 2006
158
3
18
here, there, and everywher
Not to worry T - but, you should know it is a word I do not like - unless of course if it fits - I would also refer you and others (you know who you are) to; dictionary.com - after all, yawl never know whatchewall might discover. . . .:wave:

Curio, without a doubt you are correct re the use of emoticons and the signed up and dues paid idiot left- note their use by the likes of twinkie aka Avroe, dabumoan et al - inspiring to say the least - wankers the likes of those and their ilk are all over the net - post something offensive and attempt to diffuse with a wanky emoty - how lovely, for them. . . . :lol:
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Tonington, I am involved in politics.

I write to my local MP (who IS Conservative, Merv Tweed --Brandon-Souris) and I have written to him multiple times.

And, if I find a source, I will email his office with my complaint.

I actually emailed him last month on an issue with the CRTC and Super-Bowl.

I am not lazy in politics, so don't take me as one of those people who complain and does nothing about it.

What has your MP said? Try the Minister or Prime Minister while you're at it. I don't take this kind of thing lightly either. That said I can't jump to conclusions on what I can only say is heresay right now. Seriously, if the Americans have information why didn't they arrest him, or maybe share it with us like we did with Mr. Arar? If they know where he is why aren't there any extradition requests? If there were, the press here in Canada certainly would have been on that.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Not to worry T - but, you should know it is a word I do not like - unless of course if it fits - I would also refer you and others (you know who you are) to; dictionary.com - after all, yawl never know whatchewall might discover. . . .:wave:

Perhaps you don't like the meaning but you certainly have a penchant for using it in reference to the Liberals. Larceny isn't a word confined to Liberal action only and in this case to even twist it to work we would have to call Conservatives and Liberals who voted to keep this bill on the books guilty of larceny.
 

karra

Ranter
Jan 3, 2006
158
3
18
here, there, and everywher
Of course I have a penchant for the word - if it fits - n'uff said?

That it applies to the Liberal Partee du Canada - you betcha it does - does it apply to the governing party of Canada - not yet it doesn't and hopefully it never will - though it drives the larcenous supporters of the Larcenous Liberal Party duh Canada nuts :wave: - as you know, if the shoe, etc etc. . . .

Did the definition apply to Mulroney's gov't - you bet - but, never more so than the current pathetic official opposition. . . .
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
They did send out an extradite request.

But Canada's doesn't see this mans actions as illegal, where in the USA they do.

So, Canada refuses to send him to the USA, because we don't see what he did as illegal.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
That debt has cost Canadians over half a trillion dollars. The interest on the debt is about $35 billion dollars a year or $95 million a day. I'll get over Mulroney when the debt is paid off.


And the Left screamed blue murder when Mulroney tried to do anything about the deficit.

I wonder why that is?
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada
L Gilbert,
Yep. Very intelligent misled people are scary sometimes. __________________________________

Yep ,I can still see "intelligent PLT" pirouetting behind backs of world leaders ,including Oueen of Engand and shouting ...."just watch me".
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
And the Left screamed blue murder when Mulroney tried to do anything about the deficit.

I wonder why that is?

Hogwash!

Mulroney had two majority mandates. I can only assume he did what he wanted to do, or at least what his backers wanted him to do. The hard choices were made by the Liberal government who were handed a fifty billion dollar deficit. Chretien was not my favourite politician but he did balance the damn books. In three years he was able to pay a bit off the debt. Sure, there were Liberal scandals, but were they any worse than Mulroney's PCs who fired a cabinet minister because of some scandal every year they were in office.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
But who are the terrorists?

The one who defend a land, and try to withraw the occupation power, or the one who engaged wars based on lies, trained bad peoples in their own country to keep a destabilized country , like cia/mossad did on many occasion??


think about it.

Hezbollah isnt a terrorist organisation, it is a resistance organisation , just like the patriots who saved United states of America in 1800 ,

Perhaps Bear - you should have named this thread;

Terrorists - A Haven for the larcenous Liberal Party du Canada

Seems to moi - that would be more in keeping - not to be confused with twinkie lover Max. . . .
LMAO!!!
And the Left screamed blue murder when Mulroney tried to do anything about the deficit.

I wonder why that is?
Hmmm?
Agreed, but it's people like Pierre we should be afraid of.
Can you expand on that?
Hogwash!
Sure, there were Liberal scandals, but were they any worse than Mulroney's PCs who fired a cabinet minister because of some scandal every year they were in office?
At least he fired them!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.