Weak.
The Ku Klux Klan believes we should scrap NAFTA. So does the NDP. There are racists in the NDP. I guess the NDP are promoting the values and policies of the Klan.
Letter From Canada: The New Christian Right
- Thread starter #juan
- Start date
Weak.
The Ku Klux Klan believes we should scrap NAFTA. So does the NDP. There are racists in the NDP. I guess the NDP are promoting the values and policies of the Klan.
I can only assume that if providing direct links to Evangelical sites and those endorsed by leading Evangelicals in Canada and those sites espouse policies and platforms in direct alignment with the Conservative platform is weak then there's no getting through to you.
And the Klan espouses policies that are in alignment with the NDP.
Thus, I guess we can only conclude that the NDP are promoting at least part of the Klan's agenda.
Nice attempt at demonizing (no pun intended).
No you proved that they have a fiscal sense of the issue. But even then because Harper and the Evanglists have a simular view of a corrupt waste of money, hardly makes Harper a knight of the Evanglist Church.
did I?
where?
tell me you're not jumping on the desperation bandwagon and putting words in my mouth as well and show me where I said anything like that. tia.
Your posted links.
It's not Harper supporting their agenda, it's a mutual agenda. They just happen not to clash. That is hardly Harper coming out of right Christian field.
I said, and I'll quote, "In contrast Harper is forwarding his church's agenda". Now can you please explain to me how he could possibly forward the agenda for one group and not the other?
please spare me the motivational speeches. I'm trying to talk in terms of actions, not psycho-babble.
and absolutely NONE of this trolling on your collective parts addresses the real point of the statement which is that what Harper is doing is IN CONTRAST to what Martin did in that Martin stood in opposition to his church.
So what if the issue is supported by him and the Church, his actions and their position, makes complete sense. Forwarding an agenda of culling the corruption is hardly denominational.
If you are referring to the Womans groups with the word other, then the answer is easy. Because they are wrong and the other, being Harper and the Churches position, are right.
btw, I'm not trolling Bit.
Gee thanx, that was enlightening. I see discussing things with you requires I tow your train of thought or be negated by your emmense intellect.
I could careless what Harpers, Martians, or whomever may come out of the Liberal leadership vote' Religion is. If you think seperating Church and state is possible, I have some property in Florida for, cheap.
Despite the fact that North America was forged out of raw wilderness by Christians, then building two countries out of nothing, with laws based on Christian values, ethics and morals, you think having someone in office with a little faith is somehow bad?
I don't follow you. You seem to be fairly well off, thanx to thousands of Christians sweat blood and tears, not to mention fairly safe from harm, thanx to those Christian based laws.
I'm not Christian, I could careless if Bob and Doug get married, I hate seeing money wasted on what amounts to corruption, but I am tired of watching successive Liberal wet noodles give away my country, one sweet tradition at a time. As a Native I see a future of incroaching give away policies, infringing on my traditions, if the current climate continues, it needs to stop now.
If it takes a man of God to stop it, so be it. What was Zzarchov saying about give and take?