Leo takes private jet to collect environmental award
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Yet your whole argument is government intervention and taxation (otherwise referred to by you as a price on carbon).
The same as my original. You are a hypocrite by definition: You don't believe that the stuff you spew should apply to you.
For what purpose? Would you give up your Honda for a newly funded electric car? Or would you realize that while electric car sounds great, with the current government and the completely unrestricted price of electricity, it would take $3 a litre for price of gas for you to break even.
And even if you do all this you do know A) Canada contributes ONLY about 1% of global CO2 AND B) the effect of manmade CO2 on the climate is likely minimal. Would you then think it was worth the changes to your lifestyle?
And again this assumes you would be willing to change your lifestyle one bit. I still think you won't which is why I believe you are a hypocrite.
Sure...I can halt the wind and change the tides too. :roll:
I'd say you are. Or have you disposed of all your petroleum products like vehicles and anything plastic including your computer and phone and I hope you do not use a grocery store or any store at all because all the products are produced using petroleum energy and transported in petroleum vehicles. So unless you live in a log cabin in the woods and handmake everything from wood and stone you are a huge hypocrite...or just full of **** about AGW!
The most common, naturally occurring element in the universe needs a pricetag? You are an idiot! I mean humans are carbon-based, as is all life on earth, so we should pay to stay alive? On top of that who the f*ck do we owe it to? I am just as entitled to live on earth as anyone so I should be entitled to my share of the tax. You start paying me for all the petroleum you use and I will let you use it, that sounds fair to me.
Just let them both on the plane with only 1 parachute (but make the parachute actually non-functional).
No, it's 97% of the scientists who actually responded to the survey. The respondents equaled only a third of those who were sent the survey, as actual REAL scientists refused to answer the survey because they felt the questions were leading to a preconceived conclusion.
Politicized, advocacy science isn't really science.
Correction; Leo has more influence and it's been scientifically shown already
... Thought that I'd fix that for ya'll
