King Charles 'should proceed WITH CAUTION and respect for the 12,000 years before'
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
12,000. It's too late for me to correct the typo now. Never mind.
Make sure you go to bed early tonight. The Coronation probably starts around 4am your time. You wouldn't want to miss it.
Personally, Charles should look at shaking everything up.
He won't, sure.
But imagine if he did.
Like... sit his ass on the throne for a year, step aside for William and Kate.
Say he agrees the Royals "take too much" and donate half their wealth to charities.
Turn most of their owned properties that they never/rarely use into heritage parks open to the public.
Pay taxes.
Yep, screw the past... whatever years.
Make the monarchy REALLY change.
He won't, sure.
But imagine if he did.
Like... sit his ass on the throne for a year, step aside for William and Kate.
Say he agrees the Royals "take too much" and donate half their wealth to charities.
Turn most of their owned properties that they never/rarely use into heritage parks open to the public.
Pay taxes.
Yep, screw the past... whatever years.
Make the monarchy REALLY change.
The Royals do pay taxes.
And why should he abdicate just to out William on the Throne? We have a thing called the Line of Succession.
Not enough.
Why should he abdicate? Cause he's not that well liked and likely will harm more than help the Monarchy. At least William is young enough to handle the changes it needs to see. Charles isn't up for it, IMO. Too much a momma's boy.
And yes, there is a line of succession - which is why Will should be on the throne after Charles. Not sure why you have an issue; what, you thought someone else should be in instead of Willy?
I generally get up about that time. Velocity channel has a free preview this week, think I'll watch Roadkill while having coffee.