Justin Trudeau’s Liberals closing in fast on Conservatives’ fundraising status

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
That's 1% after 20 weeks so your number is bogus and even if it were true, it's still far too few to require some arbitrary, unenforceable law.

Trudeau defends his abortion stance, cites father's protection of rights

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau is pointing to the actions of his own father, a devout Catholic, in explaining why he thinks it is important for political leaders to “stand up” for Canadians’ rights on contentious issues such as abortion.

In an interview with the Citizen Thursday, Trudeau reacted to concerns raised by Toronto’s Catholic Archbishop Thomas Collins, who has urged the Liberal leader to reverse his policy of screening out prospective candidates for the party who oppose abortion.

But Trudeau indicated he’s not about to change his mind, and he spoke of how his own father, Pierre Trudeau, once took actions in government — on divorce and homosexuality — that were not necessarily in line with the thoughts of some Catholics.

“I had an extraordinary example in a father who had deeply, deeply held personal views that were informed by the fact that he went to church every Sunday, read the Bible regularly to us, and raised us very, very religious, very Catholic,” said Trudeau.

“But at the same time he had no problem legalizing divorce, decriminalizing homosexuality and moving in ways that recognized the basic rights of the people.

“He held his personal views very, very strongly. But he understood that as leaders, as political figures, as representatives of a larger community, our utmost responsibility is to stand up for peoples’ rights.”

In the early 1980s, Pierre Trudeau was the driving force behind constitutional change that featured the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as its centerpiece.

“The Liberal party is the party of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” Justin Trudeau told the Citizen. “It defines us in the way it defines this country.”

“And since 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that a woman’s right to a choice in this matter is a Charter right. Is upheld by the Constitution.”

Trudeau said individuals in the Liberal party are “allowed and even encouraged” to have personal views.

But the party “needs to make sure that with its votes we do not accept that a government could legislate away a woman’s fundamental rights.”

Trudeau defends his abortion stance, cites father's protection of rights


Pierre Trudeau was the worst PM we ever had.....and he actually had a discernable IQ, unlike his son. Try and imagine how much any reference to Pierre works in convincing me of anything.......

“And since 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that a woman’s right to a choice in this matter is a Charter right. Is upheld by the Constitution.”
The above statement is simply untrue.....the SCOC has NEVER recognized the "right" of a woman to have an abortion, they simply found the law requiring approval by a panel of doctors unconstitutional, and invited Parliament to pass a new law.

In the early 1980s, Pierre Trudeau was the driving force behind constitutional change that featured the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as its centerpiece.

The Charter is totally useless in defence of individual rights, as proven by the Whatcott decision. It is garbage.

900 viable children dead is definitely enough for a law, as the MAJORITY of Canadians believe.......

New poll shows most Canadians support abortion — with some restrictions | National Post
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,609
1,507
113
61
Alberta
Oh man this paranoia was dealt to me in the other forum I attended.
I was none other than three different people. Eventually that got cleared up .
But hey , look the lowdown is this. You and Gerryh seem to type the same .

FYI I have a very public image. With the exception of the deal I got going on with FiveParadox it is pretty clear that Gerryh and I are not the same person.

I read your blog and it just sounds like gerryh , the whole take on pedophilia and now Gerryh's accusation to me of underage molestation.
The whole take on pedophilia? What would that be? That I think it's wrong? If that makes Gerryh and I the same person I could think of worse similarity in trait.

It's more the meter and tone that gets me and the level of dryness to the type. It reads very thin, grammatically correct but thin .
What?

You must realize there are rules of morals for different classes of people. I don't condone having sex with someone under the age of consent nor would I engage in such. It's just different classes of people do have their different morals.
It would be interesting to have read a smidgen of some relevance to this in your blog.
It sounds like you condone this sort of behavior? There is nothing excusable or moral about child molestation no matter what class of society you come from.

I digress. There is another angle that I think might be the correct take on you two posters.
This oughta be good. :)

You seem to be just one of gerryh's lap dogs . Attacking the new guy, for what exactly?
I feel we Conservatives should send a message at any cost to what has taken over the party?
Gerryh's lap dogs yeah. Okay. I don't believe your a conservative, not even Red Tory, not even a Joe Who supporter Red Tory.

You don't like that idea and just want to sit back and support the logo like sheep!
You are really full of crap. And seem very familiar.

It irks me to no end.
That's tough.

What?, I'm too rough on you for your complacency and duplicitous support of a party over run with fascists!
You are either obtuse or just deliberately playing games. Your accusations of complacency are quite contrived.

So now I'm some guy from the past.
Either that or your a cookie cutter version of a garden variety troll who's been here before.

How weak a stance you really have, go back to your task master gerryh and get a pat on the head for effort.
Again very suspect. That you would try to link me to Gerryh smacks of someone who has been shown the door in the past. Personally I could care less what you think. I have business in the bat cave with Bruce Wayne. :lol:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Lastly, a majority of Canadians are not idiot prolifers (thankfully).


Didn't read the link, did ya. Is that because you don't understand it? Maybe ask someone to explain it to you. Any 14 yr old should be able to do that for you.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
It's not about death, it's about pain and suffering. And again, your 900 number is bogus because that is less than 1% after 20 weeks, not 1% are late stage.

Lastly, a majority of Canadians are not idiot prolifers (thankfully).

Well, that depends on how you define "late term". Actually, I agree, but 1% after 20 weeks was the only figure available. I would set the limit at either 22 or 24 weeks. As well, the 90,000 number is probably low..............

One late term, without clear medical reason, is far too many.

And the ****ing idiot here is you, in your defense of the indefensable.

And yes, the polls say Canadians would prefer some restriction.............that makes the majority "idiot prolifers" if I read you correctly.

http://www.lifecanada.org/images/Na...s - LifeCanada Abortion Report 2013 FINAL.pdf

New poll shows most Canadians support abortion — with some restrictions | National Post

http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Abortion-Report-May-11-2011.pdf
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,142
8,151
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca


You can have him, he's screwed up the USA.. it's your turn.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
We already have a crazy liberal in office who's screwed up our country.

Just replace your military spending with fossil fuel subsidies.
 
Last edited: