It's Climate Change I tell'ya!! IT'S CLIMATE CHANGE!!

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,074
3,607
113
Spain calls wildfires one of its worst disasters in years
Author of the article:AFP
AFP
Published Aug 26, 2025 • 1 minute read

As of Tuesday, there were still 15 active wildfires burning in Spain Photo by Cesar MANSO /AFP
Madrid (AFP) — The Spanish government on Tuesday described wildfires that have swept the country as one of the country’s worst environmental disasters in years, as it approved relief measures for affected areas.


Blazes that flared across Spain this month have ravaged over 350,000 hectares (865,000 acres), killed four people and forced thousands of people to temporarily evacuate.


“It is obvious we are facing one of the biggest environmental catastrophes in recent years,” Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska told a news conference after a weekly cabinet meeting.

The cabinet declared areas hit by the wildfires a disaster area, a move that unlocks direct aid, tax breaks and other assistance for affected communities.

There were 15 still active wildfires fires at level two — meaning they pose a threat to people and property — on Tuesday.

The main opposition Popular Party (PP) has accused Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s administration of delaying support for regional governments, which are responsible for disaster response.


The worst-hit areas — Castile and Leon, Extremadura, and Galicia in the north and west — are governed by the PP.

PP leader Alberto Nunez Feijoo on Monday accused the government of poor planning, and proposed a 50-point plan that included creating a national registry of arsonists.

Grande-Marlaska insisted, though, that “all available state resources” had been deployed, with assistance also arriving from foreign fire crews.

He accused the PP of “using these difficult moments for many people as part of their political agenda”.

The minister said the government would review the opposition’s proposals, but stressed that arson accounted for only a small proportion of the fires.

The blazes started during a two-week heatwave that sent temperatures above 40C.

Scientists say climate change is driving longer, more intense, and more frequent heatwaves worldwide, fuelling wildfires.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,074
3,607
113
Firefighters try to corral California forest blaze as lightning strikes bring new risk
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Published Aug 26, 2025 • 2 minute read

Firefighters dig a line as the the Garnet Fire burns.
Firefighters dig a line as the the Garnet Fire burns Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025, in Fresno County, Calif. Photo by Ethan Swope /AP Photo
FRESNO, Calif. — Firefighting crews tried to corral a fast-growing blaze churning through central California’s Sierra National Forest as forecasters warned Tuesday that lightning strikes from thunderstorms could spark new ignitions.


Since breaking out Sunday afternoon, the Garnet Fire has scorched 14 square miles (36 square km) of grass, chaparral and timber in a remote area known for camping and hiking about 60 miles (97 km) east of Fresno. There was no containment.


Firefighters were aided by scattered rain showers as they worked to protect the tiny Balch Camp community and nearby hydroelectric facilities along the Kings River, according to a Tuesday incident report.

“However, continued strong, erratic winds on top of dry, heavy vegetation will likely test containment efforts,” the report said.

Parts of central and northern California are under red flag warnings for increased fire threat from dry lightning that could accompany thunderstorms, the National Weather Service said.


The 10-square-mile (26-square-km) Pickett Fire in Napa County wine country saw little growth Monday as crews kept flames contained to canyons about 80 miles (130 km) north of San Francisco. It was 17% contained on Tuesday.

There have been no reports of damage to any vineyards from the fire, a spokesperson for the trade group Napa Valley Vintners said Monday.

In central Oregon, rain and cooler temperatures helped crews make progress against the Flat Fire, which has charred 34 square miles (88 square km) of rugged terrain in Deschutes and Jefferson counties since igniting in dry, hot weather last Thursday. It was 7% contained on Tuesday.

“The incident, for the first time in the last three days, is really beginning to stabilize,” Travis Medema, the state’s chief deputy state fire marshal, told a community meeting Monday night.


Authorities at one point ordered evacuations for more than 4,000 homes but lifted orders for some areas on Monday.

Among those who evacuated were actor Rainn Wilson and his family. “The Office” star said on social media that they fled a mountain cabin near the town of Sisters, Oregon. In late 2024, Wilson’s home in Southern California was damaged by a wildfire.

“This is our fourth evacuation over the last six years,” Wilson said in a video posted Monday. “No matter where I go on the west coast, there’s fires ravaging the land, and it makes me really sad for our forests.”

Although it’s difficult to tie a single fire or weather event directly to climate change, scientists say human-caused warming from burning fossil fuels like coal and gas is causing more intense heat waves and droughts, which in turn set the stage for more destructive wildfires.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,074
3,607
113
Wildfires in 2023 drove Canada’s air pollution. How could it affect life expectancy?
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Jordan Omstead
Published Aug 28, 2025 • 3 minute read

A new global report says record-breaking 2023 wildfires drove Canada’s air pollution to levels not seen since at least the late 1990s and exposed half the country to pollution concentrations above the national standard.


Canada’s average pollution levels were near the middle of the pack among the countries and territories included in the report, but some of its hard-hit wildfire regions rivalled some of the world’s most polluted places.


The researchers estimate if 2023 levels of pollution in areas of Northwest Territories and northeastern parts of British Columbia were sustained over a lifetime, compared to staying within the World Health Organization’s guideline, that could cut life expectancy by about four years.

The report produced by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago says Canada’s 2023 national average air pollution was the worst it’s been since the group’s records began in 1998.

The annual Air Quality Life Index update combines data from satellites and ground monitoring stations to come up with estimates of average levels of pollution called PM2.5, fine particulate matter so small it can travel deep into the lungs and pose serious risks to human health.


The report says air pollution and climate change, which is leading to more severe wildfires, are “deeply connected” and are driven by the same source: the burning of fossil fuels.

“If we want to solve this, we need to go to the root of the issue, which is fossil fuel burning,” said Christa Hasenkopf, the director of the Clean Air Program at the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago.

The report estimates Canada’s 2023 average PM2.5 concentrations were around 9.2 micrograms per cubic metre, slightly higher than the national standard of 8.8, but almost twice as high as the WHO’s guideline of 5.

The researchers estimate that if those levels were maintained over a lifetime, compared to WHO guidelines, it would cut life expectancy by about half a year.


The report says about 50 per cent of Canadians were exposed to levels above the national standard in 2023, “a stark jump” from less than five per cent in the previous five years.

Globally, the report says air pollution is the greatest external threat to life expectancy. In Canada, 2023 levels would make air pollution the fifth biggest external threat, ahead of self-harm and interpersonal violence, and just behind alcohol use and unintentional injuries.

While 2023 was an unprecedented wildfire year in Canada, this year now ranks as the second worst on record.

The researchers’ life expectancy methodology comes from two peer-reviewed studies that analyzed a “unique natural experiment,” based on China’s Huai River policy, the report says.


The 1950s policy provided people north of the river with free or heavily subsidized coal for indoor heating during the winter, but not those to the south, the studies say.

Those studies found a significant drop in life expectancy north of the river where pollution levels were higher, mainly due to a significant rise in deaths from heart and lung disease. There was no clear change in deaths from other causes north of the river, the studies say.

By comparing two subgroups of the same population that experienced prolonged exposure to different levels of air pollution, the studies were able to “plausibly isolate” the effect of air pollution from other facts that affect health, the report says.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,057
14,453
113
Low Earth Orbit
Wildfires in 2023 drove Canada’s air pollution. How could it affect life expectancy?
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Jordan Omstead
Published Aug 28, 2025 • 3 minute read

A new global report says record-breaking 2023 wildfires drove Canada’s air pollution to levels not seen since at least the late 1990s and exposed half the country to pollution concentrations above the national standard.


Canada’s average pollution levels were near the middle of the pack among the countries and territories included in the report, but some of its hard-hit wildfire regions rivalled some of the world’s most polluted places.


The researchers estimate if 2023 levels of pollution in areas of Northwest Territories and northeastern parts of British Columbia were sustained over a lifetime, compared to staying within the World Health Organization’s guideline, that could cut life expectancy by about four years.

The report produced by the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago says Canada’s 2023 national average air pollution was the worst it’s been since the group’s records began in 1998.

The annual Air Quality Life Index update combines data from satellites and ground monitoring stations to come up with estimates of average levels of pollution called PM2.5, fine particulate matter so small it can travel deep into the lungs and pose serious risks to human health.


The report says air pollution and climate change, which is leading to more severe wildfires, are “deeply connected” and are driven by the same source: the burning of fossil fuels.

“If we want to solve this, we need to go to the root of the issue, which is fossil fuel burning,” said Christa Hasenkopf, the director of the Clean Air Program at the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago.

The report estimates Canada’s 2023 average PM2.5 concentrations were around 9.2 micrograms per cubic metre, slightly higher than the national standard of 8.8, but almost twice as high as the WHO’s guideline of 5.

The researchers estimate that if those levels were maintained over a lifetime, compared to WHO guidelines, it would cut life expectancy by about half a year.


The report says about 50 per cent of Canadians were exposed to levels above the national standard in 2023, “a stark jump” from less than five per cent in the previous five years.

Globally, the report says air pollution is the greatest external threat to life expectancy. In Canada, 2023 levels would make air pollution the fifth biggest external threat, ahead of self-harm and interpersonal violence, and just behind alcohol use and unintentional injuries.

While 2023 was an unprecedented wildfire year in Canada, this year now ranks as the second worst on record.

The researchers’ life expectancy methodology comes from two peer-reviewed studies that analyzed a “unique natural experiment,” based on China’s Huai River policy, the report says.


The 1950s policy provided people north of the river with free or heavily subsidized coal for indoor heating during the winter, but not those to the south, the studies say.

Those studies found a significant drop in life expectancy north of the river where pollution levels were higher, mainly due to a significant rise in deaths from heart and lung disease. There was no clear change in deaths from other causes north of the river, the studies say.

By comparing two subgroups of the same population that experienced prolonged exposure to different levels of air pollution, the studies were able to “plausibly isolate” the effect of air pollution from other facts that affect health, the report says.
How did we manage to survive with wood heat for hundreds of thousands of years?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,565
11,097
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Shorter lifespans, and there wasn’t 8,200,000,000 and counting humans alive at the same time? You gotta use what you have, be it coal or wood or buffalo chips or natural gas, etc…to live outside of the temperate zones bracketing the equator.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,587
9,632
113
Washington DC
Shorter lifespans, and there wasn’t 8,200,000,000 and counting humans alive at the same time? You gotta use what you have, be it coal or wood or buffalo chips or natural gas, etc…to live outside of the temperate zones bracketing the equator.
Technical point. . . those are "tropical zones." Up to 23 degrees from the equator. The "temperate zones" are those which experience the full seasonal cycle, from the tropics at about 23 North and south to the Arctic and Antarctic Circles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,565
11,097
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Technical point. . . those are "tropical zones." Up to 23 degrees from the equator. The "temperate zones" are those which experience the full seasonal cycle, from the tropics at about 23 North and south to the Arctic and Antarctic Circles.
Ok. I meant the zones where you could wear clothing, or not, optionally, 12 months of the year, and not have your fingers and toes (or other bits and pieces) fall off due to the cold.