Israel prepares to launch attack....

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
#juan said:
ITN

Iran won't be invaded, I don't believe, but their nuclear plants will be bombed back to the stone age

And you think that is okay? Iran is not threatening anyone just now, but we better destroy them before they do. No doubt Israel will use the latest DU bunker buster to do it and to hell with the consequences to the people and children down the road.

No, I don't think its okay #juan, I think it's terrible. But I also believe that Iran is ruled with an iron religious fist and they will stop at nothing to get rid of Israel. They teach it in their schools for crying outloud. What more proof of that do you need?
 

zoofer

Council Member
Dec 31, 2005
1,274
2
38
There are a few anti American Saddamites who would be delighted to see Israel vaporized.

A reporter last month asked Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz, the Israel Defense Force's chief of staff, how far Israel is willing to go to stop Iran's nuclear (weapons) program; the general answered: "2,000 kilometers" - the flying distance from Israel to Iran's key nuclear sites.

Leftwing appeasers would sit on the fence and when they were threatened would demand that the USA defend them. :roll:
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
 

Alberta'sfinest

Electoral Member
Dec 9, 2005
217
0
16
RE: Israel prepares to la

I'm not really too suprised at this. I predicted three years ago the the desolation would take place in march, and the tribulation would take place around three years later. I don't trust Israel, but I also don't trust Iran.

I think that if we do not want Iran to posess nuclear weopons, and wish to limit their abilities to create their own nuclear material, we should be providing them with the material and help them build their reactors as a peace offering. We could easily set them up with nuclear power generation and give them a deal on the materials in a effort to limit their abilities for nuclear weopons. However, our leaders are foolish morons that will botch this up at every step, and a full out war in the middle east is going to happen in three years time, which will turn into WWIII as lines are drawn and alliances are solidified by ideals.
I quite honestly don't give a rats ass about it though, and am looking forward to the world imploading. My hope is that the degenerates of the earth that support wars, and harbour feelings of hate will simply wipe eachother out, any remaining survivors will be judged and killed for their actions or support of the systems that always lead us to this end time and time again. I'm going to use this period to spread my own personal idealism that would lead us to peace, and lead those who want something better to a victory over those who stand in the way of achieving peace. The function of the world will be written in stone, unchangeable but perfect, designed to institute equality and fairness. The essential design of the system is to eliminate all posibility to assume power, or to dictate the social function of society.

Essentially, I simply plan to assume power so that I can make it impossible for anyone to excercise power ever again, even me. Without the ability to gain power or influence, we will have achieved true equality of liberties. Governments will have no purpose but to administrate finances appropriately, and conduct the worlds business. Those who will see this utopia come to fruitation will be stunned by the simplicity and perfection of the system. I decided to call the new era," After Enlightenment", or simply abreviated to AE. The beginning of this new era will begin on december of 2013. Things will get better, but they have to get worse first.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
Do me a favor #juan, never presume you know what I mean better than I do, at the very least it makes you look presumptious among other colorful metaphors I would rather not use.
.


My questions are too factual for you i guess??
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
zoofer said:
There are a few anti American Saddamites who would be delighted to see Israel vaporized.

A reporter last month asked Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz, the Israel Defense Force's chief of staff, how far Israel is willing to go to stop Iran's nuclear (weapons) program; the general answered: "2,000 kilometers" - the flying distance from Israel to Iran's key nuclear sites.

Leftwing appeasers would sit on the fence and when they were threatened would demand that the USA defend them. :roll:



Anything goes on here, tell me when was the last time iran has ever attack someone?? now tell me, how often israel attack dfenless people in palestine??


now tell me who is the most dangerous ???
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
I think not said:
You're beginning to sound more dangerous than Iran's leader. :roll:


Again like i said, my questions are too factual for you i guess, americans in general doesnt like facts, they way prefer fairy tail, no wonder why 70% of americans believed that saddam hussein was behind 9-11.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Here are the facts:

Israel is a modern, western democracy that is unlikely to use nuclear weapons unless attacked with weapons of mass desruction.

Iran is a pseudo democracy that is in reality a theocracy, led by a religious fanatic who has stated that Israel "should be wiped off the map". Before this idiot, high ranking clerics had publically mused that nuclear weapons in Iran's hands WOULD be immediately used against Israel.

It is too late when there is a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv.

Iran must be stopped.

The sooner Israel smacks Iranian nuclear sites with bunker-busters, the better.

The probability of a short sharp nuclear exchange is simply too high for the Israelis NOT to do something.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Thanks...I thought...well I will keep my thought to myself this time. :)
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Colpy said:
Here are the facts:

Israel is a modern, western democracy that is unlikely to use nuclear weapons unless attacked with weapons of mass desruction.

.


You also forget to mention ,that israel also use terror in palestinians territory, which goes against un chart and human rights, and just about 65 resolutions has been violated by israel in 50 years, about 3 times what saddam violated at the UN.You also forgot to say that israel is also leaded by fanatic religious moron, who think israel is the holy land, and every piece of sand in israel belongs to the jews, and if that land dropped in the hand of the arab, then we all go to hell, that is for me, the worst thing i ever heard in my entire life.



Colpy said:
Iran must be stopped.

The sooner Israel smacks Iranian nuclear sites with bunker-busters, the better.

The probability of a short sharp nuclear exchange is simply too high for the Israelis NOT to do something.


THe one who should be stopped is israel and usa, they are the ones who are creating this world fille with terrorist, terrorist act arent from religious reason, they are there because of the foreign occupation.


Here is a good article on terrorism from an american professor in chicago

http://journals.aol.com/bmiller224/OldHickorysWeblog/entries/3192

In his book, Pape argues based on analysis of the incidents, that the most likely situation to generate suicide terrorism is one which:

[N]ational[ist] resistance to foreign occupation, a democratic political system in the occupying power, and a religious defference between the occupied and occupying societies are the main causal factors leading to thrise of suicide terrorist campaigns. ... [M]odern suicide terrorism is best understood as a strategy used by groups seeking to compel democratic states to withdraw military forces from territory that they consider their national homelands. It also explains why a difference in the predominate religion of the two societies - not the religion of the occupied nation, Muslim or otherwise - is a main cause for why some foreign occupations by a democratic state escalate to suicide terrorism and other do not.




do u think it is normal that palestinians lived sorrounded by walls??

would you accept this in your country??
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Re: RE: Israel prepares to launch attack....

Jay said:
Thanks...I thought...well I will keep my thought to myself this time. :)


Go for it man, don t be shy.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
You also forget to mention ,that israel also use terror in palestinians territory, which goes against un chart and human rights, and just about 65 resolutions has been violated by israel in 50 years, about 3 times what saddam violated at the UN.You also forgot to say that israel is also leaded by fanatic religious moron, who think israel is the holy land, and every piece of sand in israel belongs to the jews, and if that land dropped in the hand of the arab, then we all go to hell, that is for me, the worst thing i ever heard in my entire life.

Ah, Israel is a secular nation, and I don't believe the current leadership can be described as "religious fanatics"

Israel offered the Palestinians a nation, and got the Second Intifada as their answer.

Israel recently abandoned the Gaza Strip to the Palestinians......just to have it immediately become a launch site for missiles into Israel.

The UN, as shown in the Durban Conference, is only slightly less anti-Jew than Heinrich Himmler. Who gives a damn what the UN says?

Israel is here to stay, we have to deal with that fact.

THe one who should be stopped is israel and usa, they are the ones who are creating this world fille with terrorist, terrorist act arent from religious reason, they are there because of the foreign occupation.

Well yeah, if you prefer despotic Islamists to western liberal democracy, I suppose. :roll: :roll:


do u think it is normal that palestinians lived sorrounded by walls??

would you accept this in your country??

Ah, Israel is surrounding ITSELF with a wall, which has effectively lowered the number of terrorist suicide attacks on Israeli civilians. Damn right I'd accept that.

I keep asking this of Arab/Palestinian supporters, but I never get an answer:

Would you rather be an Arab living in Israel, or a Jew living in any of the surrounding Arab States?

The answer should indicate which side is deserving of support.
 

aeon

Council Member
Jan 17, 2006
1,348
0
36
Colpy said:
Ah, Israel is a secular nation, and I don't believe the current leadership can be described as "religious fanatics"


Well sharon is one of them he believe in great israel , just like the crazy extremist zionist.( which is the one iran leader who are talking about)


Colpy said:
Israel offered the Palestinians a nation, and got the Second Intifada as their answer.

Israel never offered anything to the palestinians, sharon is all against it. The second infitada is the result of the israeli policy, which palestinians has been under illegal occupation for 37 years.





Colpy said:
The UN, as shown in the Durban Conference, is only slightly less anti-Jew than Heinrich Himmler. Who gives a damn what the UN says?

That is really lame what you just said, according to many jew around the world,including my girlfriend( yes she is a jew) what the palestinians are living are really similar what they have suffered during ww2 under nazi regime

. Also , i have a great news for you, the one who should care about the UN, is israel, cause in 1948, UN gave the jews, israel as their own country, incredible isnt??



[quote="Colpy"
Well yeah, if you prefer despotic Islamists to western liberal democracy, I suppose. :roll: :roll: [/quote]

Western liberal democracy, which democracy are you talking about?? if you think we live in a democracy, then i have a better one for you, santa claus exist for real.



Colpy said:
Ah, Israel is surrounding ITSELF with a wall, which has effectively lowered the number of terrorist suicide attacks on Israeli civilians. Damn right I'd accept that.

Ok you just accept that arab lived withouth human rights, but you expect them(arabs) to be angels with chocolate wings.I am sorry but there is something wrong in what you say.


Imagine you accept their situations withouth even being there, you accept to send thousands troops to kill innoncent peoples overthere withouth even knowing what is really going on, imagine if you were illegally occupied just like the palestinians, you would just be ( iam sorry to tell you that) a terrorist.

Colpy said:
I keep asking this of Arab/Palestinian supporters, but I never get an answer:

Would you rather be an Arab living in Israel, or a Jew living in any of the surrounding Arab States?

The answer should indicate which side is deserving of support.


I would rather be a jew anywhere in the world, cause whatever you can think, jews has more right than any other arabs in the whole world.
 

Nosferax

Nominee Member
[quote="aeon]
That is really lame what you just said, according to many jew around the world,including my girlfriend( yes she is a jew) what the palestinians are living are really similar what they have suffered during ww2 under nazi regime

[/quote]

Unless your girlfriend is 70 or so she doesn't really know what it was like to live under the nazi regime. There were jews in america and canada during the second world war and they don't know what it was like either. Those who were in occupied country during WW2 are the one who know.

What your girlfriend knows (even if she's a jew) is the same thing that we all know about the holocaust. She read the same book, watch the same documentary and heard the testimony of victim. But being a young jew in 2006 doesn't give her any special insight on the subject.

The palestinan aren't gased, burned in their mosque, raped and being experimented upon. They are free to integrate (many did and they even have representation in the Knesset).

As for their living condition, their neighbour are also to blame. Egypt, jordania, Syria could help them financially and socially but i guess it's more economical for them to sell them arms and bomb material.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
aeon said:
I think not said:
You're beginning to sound more dangerous than Iran's leader. :roll:


Again like i said, my questions are too factual for you i guess, americans in general doesnt like facts, they way prefer fairy tail, no wonder why 70% of americans believed that saddam hussein was behind 9-11.

No we don't believe in facts, we prefer being misled, we actually get a kick out of it. That's one of the reasons why I go to forums taht aren't American, so the enlightened world can fill me in. Any other stereotypes you care to share?
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Again like i said, my questions are too factual for you i guess, americans in general doesnt like facts, they way prefer fairy tail, no wonder why 70% of americans believed that saddam hussein was behind 9-11.
----------------------------Aeon-------------------------

As opposed to 50 percent of the entire world thinks
America was behind the 9/11 attacks on itself.

We all think we know more than the other guy.

How proud we all are.