Consistently chaotic.
Just like politicians like to be, accountable only to themselves. "Oh, gee, I caused a flood that killed thousands of people. Bad me. ................... Hmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder where I put my milkshake." roflmao
So you think He's indifferent?
I guess it's hard to visualize a being that
can be non effected if He chose, then decide to become affected. But it doesn't make sense to do that does it?. Why go from the comfortable to the uncomfortable. If one of your created being's misery suddenly affects you, make him non-existant, then create another clone at the state he was in just prior to when you were unhappy, then try again, keep doing it just as long as his action creates misery. The unique "Love" you had for him can be duplicated in the next of his clones. So you now "Love" him in the same uniqueness you had for the former. I'm assuming even uniqueness can be duplicated by Him.
Religion describes created beings has needing a creator, but I sometime wonder if we put too much weight on the belief of the Creator's omni(whatever) dependance on nothing. Maybe He does need us. In the vast nothingness we are told He is content in existance without any other beings. Utterly alone....... but content. Now if there suddenly becomes a desire to be
not alone in existance, isn't that a disatisfaction of state, or disatisfaction of some form, or is that simply a desire to have a difference. Is the desire for difference an imperfection? Is the desire for amusement a disatisfaction, if that is the correct word.? It does serve to satiate something.
On another angle, a being can create a caring striving world where each being has brotherly love, but be governed by an indifferent Creator who
claims to be caring, just as it can for a Creator who
is caring, and we couldn't even tell the difference.
Just waxing metaphysical.
AndyF
!!!!!!
