When you subject them to mould yes they are. You cannot be this stupid all by yourself so who are you trying to swindle with your bull**** analysis of what the prisoners did or didn't get subjected to. If you had said mould is bad then this would have been over long ago.
Now you just look like a liar, not a big surprise as that is pretty common these days.
A Nation full of paid liars, what's not there to be proud of? (the scientists, you would like just to make a new friend who is also probably just as big a liar)
The Big Chill
A major survey of federal government scientists commissioned by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) has found that 90% feel they are not allowed to speak freely to the media about the work they do and that, faced with a departmental decision that could harm public health, safety or the environment, nearly as many (86%) would face censure or retaliation for doing so.
The survey, the findings of which are included in a new report titled
The Big Chill, is the first extensive effort to gauge the scale and impact of “muzzling” and political interference among federal scientists since the Harper government introduced communications policies requiring them to seek approval before being interviewed by journalists. Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault is currently conducting her own investigation of the policies, which have been widely criticized for silencing scientists, suppressing information critical or contradictory of government policy, and delaying timely, vital information to the media and public.
In particular, the survey also found that nearly one-quarter (24%) of respondents had been directly asked to exclude or alter information for non-scientific reasons and that over one-third (37%) had been prevented in the past five years from responding to questions from the public and media.
In addition, the survey found that nearly three out of every four federal scientists (74%) believe the sharing of scientific findings has become too restricted in the past five years and that nearly the same number (71%) believe political interference has compromised Canada’s ability to develop policy, law and programs based on scientific evidence. According to the survey, nearly half (48%) are aware of actual cases in which their department or agency suppressed information, leading to incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading impressions by the public, industry and/or other government officials.
expecting criminals to look after the jail seems kind of silly considering they can't look after themselves and stay out of jail.
You have case histories to cite do you that shows your statement is valid? How about a system that intentionally lets conditions exist that creates violence that continues after they get out. Seems more like they are making sure they have some repeat customers.
