The original tiki torch parade.
![1702731913850.jpeg 1702731913850.jpeg](https://forums.canadiancontent.net/data/attachments/18/18650-4ddf0f0d13f535f28cc19b9b82bceeff.jpg)
Honestly, I’ve never thought of the natives in Alaska as Alaska natives, or the natives in Hawaii has Hawaii natives, or even as American natives….& as far as the Hawaiian branch goes, I’ve just thought of them as Polynesians…. Never made that distinction.
The natives in Alaska were just natives in Alaska mentally for me I guess. never dawned on me to try and break that down as part of an American thing. In hindsight, I guess yourself as an American, would see them as branches of America, and then would have those mental subdivisions. I get it, but I’ve never thought that myself.
OK, we've accepted that it's politically OK for Native characters to be played by Native actors of any nation, but is it politically correct for a Hawaiian Native to play a continental Injun? If so, how about other Polynesians?
OK, your question in the opening post is making more sense now. It was just outside of my mental framework.
So above you’re asking if a Samoan should be able to portray a Hawaiian in a movie without offending the sensibilities of somebody or another? Both being Polynesian… And maybe my example question above isn’t a great one because I think Samoa has ties to America too…. but anyway, if it doesn’t offend other Polynesians, should it offend anybody else? Does that island cross pollination in actor role, selection, offend, other Polynesians?
Does a Hawaiian (I guess being an American native to Americans anyway) playing a movie roll as a “continental” aboriginal offend, the non-island continent based Native population? Or vice versa? If it doesn’t offend those two populations, then the rest of us shouldn’t give a shit. If it does, then it needs to be mentally revisited.
…But for some reason, we call "Alaska Natives" and "Native Hawaiians" just that, separate from "Native Americans." even though we treat them the same.
I don’t think we do. I think that’s an American thing. I don’t think Canadians do anyway, but maybe that’s just me.
Does Canada do the same with the Arctic peoples, or do y'all lump 'em all together?
For those that have never been in the north or lived in the north, maybe? For those that do have that experience though, that would be a big negative.
I think this is more national thing than an aboriginal thing. Seriously. I don’t know how Americans think of Alaskan based native people. It never dawned on me that you would think of them differently.
On the Canadian side of the borders (plural) when you factor in the Alaskan Canadian border also… the aboriginal population in the north see themselves differently. They’ve been treated differently by government.
First, the Inuit are not Eskimos. if you make that mistake, you might get a punch in the mouth for your terminology. They are not treaty people So they see themselves as something different. If you’re in a bar in the north…. You don’t mistake Inuit for Dene, or Dene for Cree, as you might get that literal or figurative punch in the mouth again.
Weird question for you. Did America bother with the reservation system in Alaska? Are there reservations up there? Did the Continental US want the land that was underneath the aboriginals up there enough to bother with a reservation system??