Infinity.

[Ariadne]

Funny when you think it's as far as the mind can see, it really isn't very far....

I think it depends a bit on how far we're willing to bend our minds.

 

[lone wolf]

Some are just downright twisted....

...never tried to figure where I'd fit in....;-)

 

[Ariadne]

If you start thinking about time in the sense of the sphere where the absolute north and south poles are both 0 and infinity simultaneously, time makes perfect sense ... so we can bend our minds all over the place if we want.

But not without parameters.

 

[socratus]

I want to go back to my message
‘Does an Absolute Infinite Frame of Reference exist?’
and understand the situation better and deeper.
===========..
1
‘ 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen / dark’
and the % of the visual matter in the Universe is few.
In other words: we have two (2) parallel Worlds –
Vacuum and Material / Physical.
Question:
What is interaction between these two ( 2) different Worlds?
2.
In the early existence of Universe its temperature was
T=2,7K -- > T=0K. We live on the warm planet Earth.
Question:
How from the Kingdom of Coldness (T=2,7K -- > T=0K )
the beautiful Earth was created?
3.
The Vacuum is not empty space.
Dirac wrote that ‘ virual particles – antiparticles ‘ live there.
The astrophysics write that ‘ dark matter/ energy’ exists there.
Question:
How can the ‘ virual particles – dark antiparticles ‘ become real?
4.
According to QED Electron in interaction with vacuum has
infinite parameters ( energy, mass …etc ).
First : it means that the Vacuum also has infinite parameter
or parameters.
Second: How in the Nature this infinite electron can have
real local physical parameters?
5.
In 1928 Dirac wrote that every elementary particle with
positive energy (+E=Mc^2 ) has its antiparticle with
negative energy (–E=Mc^2).
But in my opinion the first man who wrote about antiparticles
was Sommerfeld. In 1916 he wrote two ( 2 ) formulas for electron.
The formula of electron as: -e=h*ac and the formula of its
antiparticle as: +e=h*ac.
Question:
What is interaction between +e=h*ac and : -e=h*ac ?
What is interaction between +E=Mc^2 and –E=Mc^2 ?
Why sometimes E= Mc^2 can behavior as a ‘rest’ particle
and sometimes can be ‘active’ and can destroy cities like
Hiroshima and Nagasaki ? Why E= Mc^2 is so strange?
My conclusion:
The answers to these questions can be get only through
understanding the Vacuum.
===.
I.S.
=====================…

 

[Ariadne]

Yes, an absolute frame of reference exists. Sometimes mathematicians have to create imaginery numbers to account for consistent irregularities, but then it really comes down to iterations like we see in Mandelbrot sets.

I'm not going to read your five points because you're not actually saying anything. Those five points may be an intereting point of reference, but what about them? Can an finite space have infinite parameters and possibilities? The answer is yes. Can an infinite space have finite parameters. Yes. Do we need parameters to prove that infinity can have concrete physical parameters. Again, the answer is yes.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Has anybody else been unable to reply to socratus if the reply includes quoting him? I can post in this thread if I don't quote him, but if I try quick reply or full reply and include any part of his posts, when I click the submit button I just get a blank screen and nothing shows up in the thread.

 

[Ariadne]

Infinity.
Infinity is the cause of the crisis in Physics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity
Question:
Can Infinity have concrete physical parameters?
============ .
Socratus

Test Run

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Probably something I've done with Firefox add-ons in my paranoia about blocking ads and scripts and cookies and tracking and yadda yadda....

 

[Ariadne]

IE is better for professional reasons ... Firefox has it's advantages, especially spelling error alerts, but thunderbird puts people in the dark.

 

[socratus]

Yes, an absolute frame of reference exists.
Sometimes mathematicians have to create imaginery numbers to account
for consistent irregularities, but then it really comes down to iterations
like we see in Mandelbrot sets.

I'm not going to read your five points because you're not actually saying anything.
Those five points may be an intereting point of reference, but what about them?
Can an finite space have infinite parameters and possibilities?
The answer is yes.
Can an infinite space have finite parameters.
Yes.
Do we need parameters to prove that infinity can have concrete physical parameters.
Again, the answer is yes.

==========.
Can an finite space have infinite parameters and possibilities?
The answer is yes.
/ Ariadne /
====.
Sorry, the answer is ‘no’.
Why?
Because to create our finite world
( for example: our planet Earth and the life on it)
the Nature needs limited numbers of constants.
They are the values that cannot be derived from theory
of creation. Any infringement of these physical ( magic)
constants doesn’t permit this creation. ( for example:
the changing of electron’s charge or mass of proton
doesn’t permit creation of atom )
These limited ( magic) numbers of constants that needed
for our creation surprised scientists.
( For example, biologists know about 100 ( hundred - ! ) kinds
of amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty - ! ) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet.)
There are many other examples about limited numbers
of constans that need for creation micro and macro worlds.
====.
s.

Can an infinite space have finite parameters. Yes.
/ Ariadne /
How is it possible what Infinite Space gives finite parameters
for material Earth creation? Does it mean that Infinite Space
have Consciousness ? Is it something Divine ?
Or maybe this process of creation and evolution was going by chance ?
s.

Do we need parameters to prove that infinity can have
concrete physical parameters.
Again, the answer is yes.
/ Ariadne /
Yes, we need them.
What are these concrete limited physical parameters
for Unlimited Infinity ?
s.
===============..