You're right. Ants are about 1.3 to 15 mm long, the Milky Way according to NASA is about 100,000 light years across, and the observable universe is about 28 billion light years across. So the observable universe is about 280,000 milky ways wide, and the milky way, taking 10 mm as an average size for an ant, is about 100 billion trillion ants wide. One can also argue that the observable universe is about 93 billion light years across, because in the time since the Big Bang the things we can see at 14 billion light years are now that much further away due to the expansion. How much bigger than that it might be we can't tell, no light has reached us from that far away, and never will. Even so, you're still right, unless I screwed up the arithmetic somewhere.an ant is to the milky way, as the milky way is to the universe...
but I'ma go out on a limb and say not even close lol
um.... cuz it is?
here's a wild assertion no one has the means to prove right or wrong
size wise, an ant is to the milky way, as the milky way is to the universe...
but I'ma go out on a limb and say not even close lol
You're right. Ants are about 1.3 to 15 mm long, the Milky Way according to NASA is about 100,000 light years across, and the observable universe is about 28 billion light years across. So the observable universe is about 280,000 milky ways wide, and the milky way, taking 10 mm as an average size for an ant, is about 100 billion trillion ants wide. One can also argue that the observable universe is about 93 billion light years across, because in the time since the Big Bang the things we can see at 14 billion light years are now that much further away due to the expansion. How much bigger than that it might be we can't tell, no light has reached us from that far away, and never will. Even so, you're still right, unless I screwed up the arithmetic somewhere.
His son came up with the term.maybe, since we're talking unfathomable numbers, only to be dwarfed by the unfathomable volume of space in the cosmos... perhaps the smallest unit of volume could be, say, a cubic light year. Now consider a googolplex of cubic light years, to the power of, or with the exponent of one googolplex... that is, a googolplex to the power of a googolplex of cubic light years, and yet that may only represent a mere grain of ice at the tip of the iceberg.
is there really any point in wasting our tiny minds contemplating it all?
don't worry, be happy
Kasner also coined the term googolplex. And how many zeros in a googolplex? A googolplex is a 1 followed by a googol of zeros. It's impossible to write out, but in scientific notation it looks like 1 x 10^10^100.
same name then?His son came up with the term.