Former PMO adviser Bruce Carson, has been accused of alleged influence peddling. The PMO has called in the RCMP, and the ethics and lobbying commissioners.
Sound old or new to you?
Sound old or new to you?
Hosed
- Thread starter Cobalt_Kid
- Start date
Key words are important petros.
Any reason you couldn't answer this question.
I know you have a habit of avoiding having to actually answer questions that might force you either expose your weaknesses, highlight your bias, or otherwise force you to concede. But why not give it a shot. It might be refreshing to be honest with yourself for a change.
Not as old as you avoiding questions. But I've been aware of this situation with Harpo's ex aid, since the middle of last week.
I think until the majority of Canadians actually bother themselves to show up on election day, the very best any party can hope to achieve is a very slim majority. And I'm not even sure if the (poll) numbers truly represent the possibility of that even happening. On a certain level all the polls really represent is a) the solid base of support that each party maintains and b) the whim of the particular individual who happens to answer the phone.
Ya, notice anything odd about that header? And do I need to post the definition of "former" for you?
Blah blah ****ing blah![/QUOTE]Quite. It's old news now petros.
I see you still can't answer the question.
I understand, fortitude isn't your strong suit. Silly agenda's are.
Yeah the story hasn't officially been released yet and you figure it's old news?
Can I borrow your time machine or at least the baggie that shot you to the future?
Here is one from 13 minutes ago. Anyone who breaks lobbying rules will face ?full consequences,? Harper says
Can I borrow your time machine or at least the baggie that shot you to the future?
Here is one from 13 minutes ago. Anyone who breaks lobbying rules will face ?full consequences,? Harper says
It was in the Toronto Sun last week dude, not my fault that news reaches the agenda driven, slowly in the sticks.
Read dates much?
Ex-Harper aide, escort linked to deal | Canada | News | Toronto Sun
March 17th.
Please do try and keep up.
And here's the definition of "former" for you...
Harpers actions were swift and decisive. Is that how this should have been handled?
I know the liberals would have made him an Ambassador somewhere, which is likely why you're confused.
Care top answer my question yet? Or is to tough for you?
What is my agenda Bear? Go get a hooker and advise me of my agenda.
It's okay, go ahead and use my name around town too considering my name is currently the name of the Canadian people. Don't worry. Get some blow too while you're at it. We've been friends for years and I'll keep hiring you back regardless of how you ****ed the people while using my name. You ****ed em' good so I don't mind and the people I represent don't mind.
Is that my agenda Bear?
Is that on topic of the OP?
Still can't answer the question eh? That's two in as many days.
Good to see I still have that magic touch of asking the questions, the ideologues just don't haven't got the guts to answer.
It wouldn't be so idiotic, if ideologues didn't keep belching the same partisan rhetoric all the time, and tried a little critical thought.
Last edited:
Am I'm ignoring that the full story was just released today and not just bits and pieces? The early bits and pieces that came out were defensive moves by the PMO before APTN was to release their entire story on the 25th which was bumped to the 21st and then again bumped to today.
The only thing I was ignoring was you.
Is that my agenda?
The only thing I was ignoring was you.
Is that my agenda?
Still can't answer the question eh? That's two in as many days.
Good to see I still have that magic touch of asking the questions, the ideologues just don't have the guts to answer.
Still can't answer the question eh? That's two in as many days.
Good to see I still have that magic touch of asking the questions, the ideologues just don't have the guts to answer.
You start answering my questions, I'll start answering yours. You have two on the table, that predate yours.
No wonder you have trouble with dates, you can't even keep up to a 30 minute long conversation, that's only two pages long!!!
Last edited:
Now the course of the conversation is lost on you?
That's it, petros has the Alzheimer, someone get me a shovel.
You are stumped as to why Carson and the PMO denials are relevant to the OP of being ****ed by govt?
You need that explained Bear? Are you still a little drunk from last night or are hitting a little hair of the dog?
You need that explained Bear? Are you still a little drunk from last night or are hitting a little hair of the dog?
Still can't answer the question eh.
Like I said, I'll answer yours when you have the fortitude to answer mine.
Until then, your posts will be the punchline to your silly little biases, as far as I'm concerned.
Good call, I cornered you, you can't answer my questions, so I must be drunk.