Harper says he'll protect traditional marriage
- Thread starter Andem
- Start date
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
I don't think any church is abusing its power by only marrying who it wants to...they do not have a monopoly on performing marriages.
Re: RE: Harper says he'll pro
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
Reverend Blair said:
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
Re: RE: Harper says he'll pro
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
Reverend Blair said:
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
Re: RE: Harper says he'll pro
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
Reverend Blair said:
Correct, and a civil marriage is no more or less legal than a marriage performed by the clergy...never has been.
If a church feels squeamish about performing a same-sex marriage, that's fine...no one can force them to marry gay couples...I would think that gay people don't have much use for the church anyway, after how they've been treated...
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
I've been surprised by that more than a few times, Vanni. Not just with gays either, but by many people who have abused by various religions. So many still wish to be accepted by their church. I'll never understand it, but that does seem to be the way it works.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
RE: Harper says he'll pro
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
Could be. I'll never understand it, but there has to be a reason for it somewhere.
Harper is a good man standing by his morals and I fully support him in his brave and noble decision.
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
Harper is a good man standing by his morals and I fully support him in his brave and noble decision.
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
Harper is a good man standing by his morals and I fully support him in his brave and noble decision.
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
Of course only religious people have any morals. :roll:
