Can be done without citizenship, so what does citizenship have to do with that?
They can't used citizenship in another nation as a shield after they've done their damage here.
Last edited:
Can be done without citizenship, so what does citizenship have to do with that?
They can't used citizenship in another nation as a shield after they've done their damage here.
Exactly why I suggest closing the door before it can happenThat's not exactly cold comfort once any damage is done.
You should go back to your family analogy.
They can't used citizenship in another nation as a shield after they've done their damage here.
What's a real-world example of this?
Exactly why I suggest closing the door before it can happen
There aren't any because most nations don't let it happen to begin with.
lol.Forget it. Here's a better idea..
The legally enforceable duties of citizenship vary depending on one's country, and may include such items as:[10]
- conscription (or volunteer in fighting in the armed forces, in countries without a conscription)
- paying taxes
- serving on a jury
- voting
- obeying the criminal laws enacted by one's government, even while abroad[11]
- for children and teens, attending school; per law by compulsory education
Citizenship - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now, please.. feel free to take any one of those aspects of citizenship and apply it to this case.
Looking at that list, there will be no conflict of interest having a PM with dual citizenship if these are the terms.
lol Correct. However, that does not stop them from doing favors and offering tasty treats to their buddies (Hey, ChRETIeN, aPPALLing, Bullroney, etc. ad infinitum ad nauseum, are your ears burning?) and padding their ways into cushy jobs after retirement.It has absolutely nothing to do with either question.
Shall we demonstrate for them?
Tell me Bear, why do MPs have to resign from business? Is it perhaps because they could put their own personal interests ahead of their constituency?
Oh, yeah.To be honest, I think they all do that regardless.
lol Some job the checks and balances are doing. They work just as well as the politicians who made them do.We wouldn't need checks and balances if they didn't need to be kept in check.
Forget it. Here's a better idea..
The legally enforceable duties of citizenship vary depending on one's country, and may include such items as:[10]
- conscription (or volunteer in fighting in the armed forces, in countries without a conscription)
- paying taxes
- serving on a jury
- voting
- obeying the criminal laws enacted by one's government, even while abroad[11]
- for children and teens, attending school; per law by compulsory education
Citizenship - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now, please.. feel free to take any one of those aspects of citizenship and apply it to this case.
Looking at that list, there will be no conflict of interest having a PM with dual citizenship if these are the terms.
lol.Omar Khadr's family would easily qualify... Sound good to you?
lol Some job the checks and balances are doing. They work just as well as the politicians who made them do.
Yup. Like I said, the checks and balances work as well as the politicians who made them. lol We get politicians that sorta work and/or sometimes work.Oh I'm not claiming they work! But we do technically have some in place, can you imagine how much more damage if we had none?
Indubitably.If anything we need more of them. I'd argue for absolute accountability for all of them.
lol.
Do you wear gloves when you grasp at straws?
It's certainly no guarantee that it will make Mulcair more wise or internationally savvy, as has been alluded to, either.The whole issue is a talking point for Rabid Rae and Harpy. I mean, I know Yankees that love Canada more than some Canadians. Citizenship is definitely no guarantee of loyalty.
Maybe you should just put the pipe down.Should I be grasping at pipes instead?
Maybe you should just put the pipe down.
It certainly isn't helping you.
You can keep trying to turn this into an argument you think you can win. But in the end, all your grasping, turning and fallacious insinuations, are for not. You just look like the partisan hack you are.Ha!
Well, it's loss of sovereignty that those who praise the status of a leader's single citizenship need to realize. I actually agree with Harper's analysis that the economy is a global venture, but his citizenship status certainly didn't mean anything for his actions.
Best example I can come up with is any time someone has committed a crime in a foreign land then sought sanctuary in their own nation's Embassy.See, okay here's a possible example that could actually change my mind.
So, how would they use citizenship in another nation as a shield?
What's a real-world example of this?