Halifax prof quits after sexual relationship with student revealed
- Thread starter spaminator
- Start date
Yes, I know. I should know better to engage, I really should. But do you ever have a "WTF" moment and you just run with it?
I know you're being facetious but that's almost a better alternative to me than redefining society standards for every turd that can't keep his di*ck in his pants. Almost.
"Never trust a woman or an automatic pistol"
John Dillinger, who was betrayed by a woman, and who died with an Colt auto in his hand.
(BTW, I trust both a woman and some automatic pistols)
John Dillinger, who was betrayed by a woman, and who died with an Colt auto in his hand.
(BTW, I trust both a woman and some automatic pistols)
Unlike you I accept that humans are not perfect and I'd like to still include them in our society.
Even the morally handicapped.
Cause just like people that can't walk
Morally handicapped people wouldn't act that way if they had control over it.
And people who can't walk would walk if they could.
Like you said. Millions do it every day without a problem.
Better to base it on nature then to base it on opinions
Let's analys this:
So you're saying any arguments based on the assumption we are natural is wrong?
So if we ain't natural what are we?
Created in gods image?
Oh! I get it. You're arguing based on you're beliefs in creationism.
Well that would explains why we don't agree!
And that's the strawman fallacy. Make up an argument you think you can beat, ascribe it to your interlocutor, and argue against it.
Essentially it's talking to yourself (well, that and lying). Both very natural, I'm sure. For you.
Unlike many I do not argue to only fulfil a need to feel right. If you guys can give me a good argument based on something real like nature or other reality I will agree and adopt it in my beliefs.
Then explain the straw man fallacy
Then explain the straw man fallacy
And how it fits into basing decision and opinions on the fact that humans are natural.
Oh! Ok then that just means you don't understand what I'm saying.
Oh! Ok then that just means you don't understand what I'm saying.
Then you can prove that you understand what I'm saying by giving me a example of why humans ain't natural like you keep insisting.
Depends on your definition of "natural." And I never said humans aren't natural. I just pointed out that your definition "natural" appears to be "whatever Angstrom likes."
Yes as soon as opinions are added into anything it has the potential to go wrong I agree.
Gerryh pointed that out to me in the girl killed herself because of gay conversion therapy thread.
If you care to read it.
I changed my beliefs in that case. I will do the same with you if you can point out where I erred,
And explain why.
How is that different then any other discussion? That's why it's called debating.... If you can't give me a good argument to counter my logic then we must try harder. How else can we discover the truth of our world?