H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007

[MikeyDB]

Might one regard the reams and reams of literature you've posted here at Canadian Content as your effort to...now how did you put it.....

"DIVIDE, ADD, THEN CONTROLHistory"

The emphasis is original......

Souldn't you be out knocking on doors?



And getting kicked off people's porches?

 

[quandary121]

Though the authors of H.R. 1955 would likely deny that the bill could be used to crack down on free speech and legitimate political opposition, the talking heads on the main stream networks have made it very clear that they would like this kind of legislation to do just that.
Can H.R. 1955 be used to silence the voices of dissent? Let's have a look.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9wJsovPRTEM

Part 2
Silencing dissenters is nothing new. During the "Red Scare" our authoritarian rulers used the label of "communist sympathizer" to coerce and intimidate the nation to into uniform silence. Like good children, we are to be seen and not heard. The House Un-American Activities Committee and McCarthyism have been pulled back out of the closet to fight a new enemy, "Homegrown Extremists". Are H.R. 1955 and S. 1959 the greatest dangers to the freedom of speech, press, and assembly since the HUAC and Sen. Joseph McCarthy? Let's have a look...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=N5NJoZRYOJk

 

[quandary121]

Might one regard the reams and reams of literature you've posted here at Canadian Content as your effort to...now how did you put it.....

"DIVIDE, ADD, THEN CONTROLHistory"

The emphasis is original......

Souldn't

you be out knocking on doors?





And getting kicked off people's porches?

And shouldn't you go back to school and learn how to read write and "SPELL"

 

[MikeyDB]

Yes you make an observation but please answer my question.

Shouldn't your exhaustive efforts to present your case as you have here at CC be regarded with the same critical balance one might afford a typical politician or minister/rabbi/Imam or any of a substantial cadre of propagandists making money selling books......

If you're not attempting to "change minds" i.e. influence perceptions and alter awareness...then what exactly are you after?

 

[MikeyDB]

Sorry you can't seem to get past something so petty as a keyboarding error, and that might supply some greater definition to the genesis of these pages of propagandist rhetoric....

A tiny mind presenting as an erudite every-man with only the interests of the "greater-good" compelling you keep publishing.....

But hey....everyone should have a hobby!

 

[quandary121]

MikeyDB im not trying to prove anything to any one ok or trying to make money as you imply im just pointing out some things that people should be made aware of

 

[MikeyDB]

According to you!

Your judgement is that if information is provided that can make influence or enhance the decision making processes that everyone faces ....THEY WILL MAKE DECISIONS THAT REFLECT the impulses/conclusions/direction....YOU want people to make..... NO?

And how is this any different than painting signs and carrying banners in long parades through screaming crowds.....?

It's propaganda my friend simply admit it as such and carry on.....

 

[quandary121]

According to you!

Your judgement is that if information is provided that can make influence or enhance the decision making processes that everyone faces ....THEY WILL MAKE DECISIONS THAT REFLECT the impulses/conclusions/direction....YOU want people to make..... NO?

And how is this any different than painting signs and carrying banners in long parades through screaming crowds.....?

It's propaganda my friend simply admit it as such and carry on.....

Rubbish is what your talking !!! the information given here is well documented and not every body is like you with your crass opinions and pathetic comments this is going on if you believe me or
not

TO ANNEX S USAF CIVIL DISTURBANCE PLAN 55-2 EXHIBIT POR:SGH, JCS Pub 6, Vol 5, AFR 160-5 hereby [SIZE=+2]provides for America's military and the National Guard State Partnership Program to join with United Nations personal in said operations[/SIZE]. This links selected U.S. National Guard units with the Defense Ministries of "Partnership For Peace." This was done in an effort to provide military support to civil authorities in response to civil emergencies. Under Presidential Decision Directive No. 25, this program serves to cement people to relationships between the citizens of the United States, and the global military of the UN establishments of the emerging democracies of Central and Eastern European countries. This puts all of our National Guardsmen under the direct jurisdiction of the United Nations. Section 3:This plan could be implemented under any of the following situation: (1) Spontaneous civil disturbances which involve large numbers of persons and/or which continue for a considerable period of time, may exceed the capacity of local civil law enforcement agencies to suppress. Although this type of activity can arise without warning as a result of sudden, unanticipated popular unrest (past riots), it may also result from more prolonged dissidence. This would most likely be an outgrowth of serious social, political or economic issues which divide segments of the American population. Such factionalism could manifest itself through repeated demonstrations, protest marches and other forms of legitimate opposition but which would have the potential for erupting into spontaneous violence with little or no warning.

 

[MikeyDB]

Sure and the world was going to be destroyed when computer chips couldn't make the leap to Y2K.....

I understand....yer enthusiastic and really really scared!

Welcome to the world.

 

[quandary121]

Sure and the world was going to be destroyed when computer chips couldn't make the leap to Y2K.....

I understand....yer enthusiastic and really really scared!

Welcome to the world.

Are you trying to fill my threads with you hopeless insidious comments m8 cos that just proves to me that you are as dumb as your profile pic suggests
It is hard to believe how incredibly stupid you are. Stupid as a stone
that the other stones make fun of

 

[quandary121]

n a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

 

[quandary121]

President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is "martial law."

 

[quandary121]

Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

 

[quandary121]

For the current President, "enforcement of the laws to restore public order" means to commandeer guardsmen from any state, over the objections of local governmental, military and local police entities; ship them off to another state; conscript them in a law enforcement mode; and set them loose against "disorderly" citizenry - protesters, possibly, or those who object to forced vaccinations and quarantines in the event of a bio-terror event.
The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups and detention of protesters, so called "illegal aliens," "potential terrorists" and other "undesirables" for detention in facilities already contracted for and under construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the cover of a trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the frenzied militarization of the southern border, detention camps are being constructed right under our noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign and domestic agenda of the Bush administration.

 

[quandary121]

Make no mistake about it: the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) is an ominous assault on American democratic tradition and jurisprudence. The 1878 Act, which reads, "Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both," is the only U.S. criminal statute that outlaws military operations directed against the American people under the cover of 'law enforcement.' As such, it has been the best protection we've had against the power-hungry intentions of an unscrupulous and reckless executive, an executive intent on using force to enforce its will.

 

[quandary121]

It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq, and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections, the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect, declare himself dictator.

 

[scratch]

It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq, and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections, the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect, declare himself dictator.

Your solution?

 

[quandary121]

Your solution?

The picture should give you some clue!!!

 

[MikeyDB]

Canadians can't impeach an American president, only Americans can do that. The fact that Americans have elected NOT to do that should tell us something about Americans.

It does!

While the Empire of America placates the dumb contry cousins who ostensibly run this country the people of the Untied States think that everything is just swell......

 

[quandary121]

Canadians can't impeach an American president, only Americans can do that. The fact that Americans have elected NOT to do that should tell us something about Americans.

It does!

While the Empire of America placates the dumb contry cousins who ostensibly run this country the people of the Untied States think that everything is just swell......

Canadians can't impeach an American president? thanks MikeyDB i was unaware of this