Great American Pants Lawsuit

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Dry cleaner closes after $67 million lawsuit over lost pants
By LUBNA TAKRURI
Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The owners of a dry cleaner who were sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants have closed and sold the shop involved in the dispute, their attorney said today.
The South Korean immigrants are citing a loss of revenue and the emotional strain of defending the lawsuit. They will focus their energy on another dry-cleaning shop they still own, said their attorney, Chris Manning.

"This is a truly tragic example of how devastating frivolous litigation can be to the American people and to small businesses," Manning said in a statement.

Soo Chung and her husband, Jin Nam Chung, faced more than two years of litigation after a former customer at Custom Cleaners alleged they had lost a pair of his pants, then sued for $67 million under the District of Columbia's strict consumer protection act.

Plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, a local administrative law judge, later lowered his demand to $54 million. He said the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service" signs that once hung in the shop were misleading and fraudulent.

The case went to trial in June and a D.C. Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the Chungs, awarding Pearson nothing. Pearson is pursuing an appeal.

The Chungs incurred more than $100,000 in legal expenses, which were eventually paid with help from fundraisers and donations.

Even after the trial ended favorably, Manning said, the Chungs lost customers and revenue. They have now closed two of their three businesses since the lawsuit began, he said.

Pearson did not respond to an e-mail from The Associated Press seeking comment.

Now it seems the judge may lose his shirt or at least his job over the lawsuit.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Tonington

The media were all over the gonzo Judge - I think he has taken a plunge into never never land and hope he doesn't get to sit on a bench judging others ever again.

The trouble he brought to that couple was ugly - and it was a good case for racism - because that seems to be the only 'case' anyone sues for these days.

My friends and I spent some energized dinners going over his suitable punishment - and suprisingly my complacant and pacific friends had some wonderfully abusive ideas...!
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Good!

I find this guy's litigious actions unfathomable. For a judge, seriously, $54 million is unreal. I really think that America should consider an upper limit on these kind of cases. In this case the hurt caused by the court action is not even close to even handed for what the complaint was.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Tonington

As I understand it - the field of law is filled with megalomaniacs and this guy may meet his final comeuppance by having to Clerk for a guy more looney than he.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
LOL, I love the title of this thread. Very good Tonington, lol.

Heh, I wish I could take the credit, found it on the link;)

I was going to make a crack about losing his shirt, drycleaner and all, but that was also taken:lol:
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I thought it would have been punnier if it was the great american pants-suit..... but that could just be me :smile: