Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job

[WilliamAshley]

RE: Fury as academics cla

How many of the professors are democrats?



Really though people outside the loop will never know.

I've heard a bunch of theories and all in all, it is fairly insignifigant.

People shouldn't be responding to "unknowns" anyway, in any preconcerted activity. But this whole thing is about "prempting potential"

If we foster negative actions then we sell out to corruption.

If we foster growth and benifit, as long as we are alive we are doing good.

Obviously within government negative actions are reinforced and positive action are recinded to private and civil actions.

IE Not for profit, tax deductions, "volunteering", donation.

Generally the norm is to "maintain or keep" not give away.
IE selfishness and self management over public use and authority.

IE singular authority rather then open determination.

It's redundant.

You can theorize all you'd like but it still isn't necisarily truth, it's mearly fact.

 

[Toro]

Nothing in what you just brought proved anything at all, it only brings questions, nice try.

Proof?

You're the one with the allegations. You're the one with the accusations. Perhaps you don't know much about the western legal system but the onus for proof is on the accuser. That's you.

And what do you offer? The testimony of one guy! And you say that's proof?

Why is there only one person on record talking about this? Why aren't there hundreds? Did you ever go to the trade center Logic? I did. It was massive. There were, what, 50-60,000 people working there. And did you know that many of the firms in the WTC were finanical firms? Many of those firms have employees working on the weekend. Many of those firms pay their employees very, very well, and those people aren't compensated with 6,7, and 8 figure pay packets working 40 hours a week. There would have been a least a couple thousand people working in that buildiing on the weekend. And only one person is on the record? And you swallow it hook, line and sinker?

You say it only brings questions. Logic, that link was nothing but questions!

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_power_down.html

And you can't answer them, can you?

My bet is that none of the conspiracists can.

It just shows the flimsiness of their arguments.

 

[Logic 7]

Nothing in what you just brought proved anything at all, it only brings questions, nice try.

Proof?

You're the one with the allegations. You're the one with the accusations. Perhaps you don't know much about the western legal system but the onus for proof is on the accuser. That's you.

And what do you offer? The testimony of one guy! And you say that's proof?

Why is there only one person on record talking about this? Why aren't there hundreds? Did you ever go to the trade center Logic? I did. It was massive. There were, what, 50-60,000 people working there. And did you know that many of the firms in the WTC were finanical firms? Many of those firms have employees working on the weekend. Many of those firms pay their employees very, very well, and those people aren't compensated with 6,7, and 8 figure pay packets working 40 hours a week. There would have been a least a couple thousand people working in that buildiing on the weekend. And only one person is on the record? And you swallow it hook, line and sinker?

You say it only brings questions. Logic, that link was nothing but questions!

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_power_down.html

And you can't answer them, can you?

My bet is that none of the conspiracists can.

It just shows the flimsiness of their arguments.

Your link proves absotly nothing at all, try harder.It is only an opinion, based on "out of context" argument, even if everything you say is true, it doesnt change anything regarding the fact there is absotly no evidence supporting the us officials story, when there is that support ""inside job" THEORY.

 

[Toro]

Your link proves absotly nothing at all, try harder.It is only an opinion, based on "out of context" argument, even if everything you say is true, it doesnt change anything regarding the fact there is absotly no evidence supporting the us officials story, when there is that support ""inside job" THEORY.

Its not supposed to "prove" anything.

It raises questions about the validity of the conspiracists claims.

And it tears those claims apart.

The onus is on the conspiracists. All they offer is theory and conjecture. They would be laughed out of a court of law.

 

[thomaska]

Re: RE: Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job

-Great Northeast Blackout of 1965, course the towers werent around so this doesnt count I suppose, was probably just a test run by the then 19 year old George W Bush...

-July 13-14th, 1977 Blackout in all of NYC..maybe they planted the explosives then...

-February, 1993 in the First attack on the Towers by Bush, the power went out, maybe the Mossad and CIA planted the explosives then...

I'm sure there have been others but this is just three of the outages that could all contend to be the ONLY power outage in history of WTC.


Your facts are lacking,Logic

Blackout has nothing to do with deliberate power down, again nice try.

Ahhh but you see, I'm sure these were deliberate powerdowns(<---is this a word?) It was the neocons doing it, don't you think so?