Filesharing does not kill the music industry

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
I use Itunes mostly. Roughly a buch a song and I'm good to go. I use a thumb key to go from my computer to my car. I too like to buy cds right from the artist, the latest Dirty Feet. I rip those to the highest bitrate I can and convert them to mp3 for the car. For me nothing comes close to live music. It's a bugger to get the band in the back seat to stay in tune. :)
 

DichotoMe

Nominee Member
Jan 6, 2009
70
1
8
CBI
Do you know any big time artists or are they all garage bands because they don’t mind the free promotion but when you get to the big time and are making big bucks then all of a sudden it is a big issue.

A couple are garbage bands, most are not, and a few are award winners (ECMA, JUNO, Grammy...). They have accepted the fact that the internet changed things. Artists are forced to tour more and sell merch other than cds such as tshirts, hats, posters... Not to mention other more creative ways to create revenue. If they are lucky enough to be on the radio they do get some royalties.

Royalyies is why musicians get into business and write good music.

Musicians get into music for the ass, don't kid yourself. Money only comes if you're really good.

Downloader of music they don’t pay for or do not have the permission of the artist’s company are thugs or shoplifters and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.There is a lot of money involved and to give you an example the late Michael Jackson according to his televised bio was making in the Thriller days $250,000 dollars an hour so artists can afford to hire big time lawyers and go after the down loaders as they should.

Just to clarify "Downloader of music" is not the same as file sharer. I can download and still pay. There is a lot of money involved because of the overhead involved in the big labels. Big record companies charge top price for band merch and push artists to the point of collapse and gouge fans just to maximize their profits. From that profit they pay the performers a small percentage and keep the rest. I don't believe that record sales alone are the majority of the profit. I'm not saying it isn't a substantial portion just not at all close to the majority of the profit.

Your example, MJ, is not really the norm in the music industry. You probably picked the richest person in music history. I have no sympathy for artists making .5-15 million for a gig or tour and then whine about losing 15% of total album sales to shared downloads. I'm positive MJ's record company was screwing him.

If you think the filesharing is ripping of artists you should learn a bit about the music industry. This could be the best thing that ever happened for artists as they can now manage themselves and maintain some dignity. Some even form their own labels and are successful.

The game is changing, adapt or die.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
The big money in music is coming from a TV crossover. Disney's presence on TV used to be just cartoons. Now it's producing music stars and a pile of money. They aren't having problems selling cd's or shirts or anything with their names attached. There is no business model that beats that kind of exposure. Video killed the radio star but primetime TV killed video.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
"Filesharing does not kill the music industry"
Nope. But it sure makes a mess of your computer if your AV, malware cleaners, etc. aren't up to date and on the job.
We quit p2p filesharing and went to getting tunes from Apple. Still trying to get the dvd thing sorted out so that our dvd burner actually recognizes a dvd disk, though. Stupid damned thing. It's brand new and only recognizes cds. lol