FBi:"No hard evidence linking bin Laden with 9/11"

[darkbeaver]

RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

Who are the real Anti-Americans and who are the fake Anti-Americans. What about the real pro-Americans who don't believe the official 9/11 story? I don't think it's Anti-American to want the truth about the 9/11 incident.
A few bad apples flying stolen planes can really destroy a countrys reputation.

 

[Toro]

RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

Yeah, well who are the real fake anti-Americans? And who are the fake real-Americans? And the fake, real, fake anti-real Americans? And the real anti-fake pro-real-fake-real-pro American jai alai players?

Answer that!


I'm sure aeon will...

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

I don't think it's Anti-American to want the truth about the 9/11 incident.

No it isn't, everyone has a right to seek the truth, and questioning and bashing the US government is an American passtime.

However, when one cannot present "verifiable and concrete evidence" that is contrary to common belief, and use obscure conspiracy theory websites that only fuel a bias already inherent to the reader, then you have to ask yourself how objective you really are.

Nobody has to believe the US government, I sure as hell don't, I never have and never will, I trust no government. Having said this, I acknowledge that despite its flaws, the American system of governance is as transparent as possible.

You can never gain the same level of information in any other country with a simple FOIL request as you can in the US. You can believe what you want from afar, but it won't change this crucial fact.

Conspiracy theories sell, that's all there is to it. Not a single theory has ever been proven, ever. You have to ask yourself, WHY?

What some posters around here are proposing, is mind boggling in terms of scale, not the action in itself, but the resources and people that had to be mobilized to keep everything under control.

 

[aeon]

Re: RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

I don't think it's Anti-American to want the truth about the 9/11 incident.

No it isn't, everyone has a right to seek the truth, and questioning and bashing the US government is an American passtime.

However, when one cannot present "verifiable and concrete evidence" that is contrary to common belief, and use obscure conspiracy theory websites that only fuel a bias already inherent to the reader, then you have to ask yourself how objective you really are.

Nobody has to believe the US government, I sure as hell don't, I never have and never will, I trust no government. Having said this, I acknowledge that despite its flaws, the American system of governance is as transparent as possible.

You can never gain the same level of information in any other country with a simple FOIL request as you can in the US. You can believe what you want from afar, but it won't change this crucial fact.

Conspiracy theories sell, that's all there is to it. Not a single theory has ever been proven, ever. You have to ask yourself, WHY?

What some posters around here are proposing, is mind boggling in terms of scale, not the action in itself, but the resources and people that had to be mobilized to keep everything under control.

Conspiracy theory sells, that is a fact, and i don't believe any of them, from katrina to the land of moon, i believe we went to the moon, i believe katrina was done by the weather, not by us governement, just like the conspiracy theory sorroudging 9-11, i dont believe it that 19 hijackers with box cutter did the event, cause just like the fbi says, there is no real evidence that alquada was behind it, since there is no real evidence, it becomes a conspiracy theory, and since there is evidence of a cover up and distortion of the facts, then the fact that your governement could be behind the attack, it is a possibility, not a conspiracy theory anymore.

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

Conspiracy theory sells, that is a fact, and i don't believe any of them, from katrina to the land of moon, i believe we went to the moon, i believe katrina was done by the weather, not by us governement, just like the conspiracy theory sorroudging 9-11, i dont believe it that 19 hijackers with box cutter did the event, cause just like the fbi says, there is no real evidence that alquada was behind it, since there is no real evidence, it becomes a conspiracy theory, and since there is evidence of a cover up and distortion of the facts, then the fact that your governement could be behind the attack, it is a possibility, not a conspiracy theory anymore.

So you believe Katrina was ACTUALLY a weather phenomenon, that's very encouraging news. :roll:

You keep saying there is no real evidence with 9/11 and yet you have never presented any evidence that would hold up in court.

 

[aeon]

Re: RE: FBi:"No hard evidence

Conspiracy theory sells, that is a fact, and i don't believe any of them, from katrina to the land of moon, i believe we went to the moon, i believe katrina was done by the weather, not by us governement, just like the conspiracy theory sorroudging 9-11, i dont believe it that 19 hijackers with box cutter did the event, cause just like the fbi says, there is no real evidence that alquada was behind it, since there is no real evidence, it becomes a conspiracy theory, and since there is evidence of a cover up and distortion of the facts, then the fact that your governement could be behind the attack, it is a possibility, not a conspiracy theory anymore.

So you believe Katrina was ACTUALLY a weather phenomenon, that's very encouraging news. :roll:

Did you really think i thought it was your governement who did katrina?

lol.

You keep saying there is no real evidence with 9/11 and yet you have never presented any evidence that would hold up in court.

I think the anhrax attack is a nice evidence that us governement try to scare peoples with terror for the war in iraq, and that was right after 9-11, that could be brought in court to show what they could have done on 9-11, building 7 is an evidence that us officials story is bogus, operation norhtwood is a good exemple what us officials are ready to do anything to get what they want.


So yes there is enough evidence.