Excellent way to get rid of Wackos.

mt_pockets1000

Council Member
Jun 22, 2006
1,292
29
48
Edmonton
Tolerance is the key to this argument mates. Respect for each other. Without it, we sound vulgar and repulsive. Sad to see our species at it's most starved and depraved, actually. And we attack each other with such ferocity! A twin tower here....an Afghan village there.

Now someone wants to have wackos banished to the arctic?!? Whew! Thats quite an undertaking Noah. Even if it's meant in jest, you can already see how dangereous such a thought can become.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
mt_pockets1000 said:
Tolerance is the key to this argument mates. Respect for each other. Without it, we sound vulgar and repulsive. Sad to see our species at it's most starved and depraved, actually. And we attack each other with such ferocity! A twin tower here....an Afghan village there.

Now someone wants to have wackos banished to the arctic?!? Whew! Thats quite an undertaking Noah. Even if it's meant in jest, you can already see how dangereous such a thought can become.

How can it be dangerous? The world would be a very better place because wackos don't do one single good thing except kill people because they believe they are religiously better than someone.

I am tolerant with everyone but wackos religious wackos are a disgrace and I don't see why people want people like Al Qaida or Zionist people running around.
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
45
Newfoundland!
OK so the question shouldn't be what we do with the whackos, but "how do we define a whacko?"

then we can kill them. unless of course the definition of whacko turns out to be someone who wants to kill all the whackos when they've been defined. then it won't be my decision cos i'll be in antarctica maybe, or killing myself in confusion.

basically things just arent that simple

another point of note. there are a lot of people who believe that people of other religions and beliefs deserve God's punishment, which I assume is worse than death, so these people honestly believe that other faiths should have a fate worse than death, but they live quite, polite lives because they have noted that most religions contain something along the lines of "thou shalt not kill". Would u round them up too? they think it but they dont do it. you see? thinking and doing are most definately not the same.
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
Viking Warrior prepared to go to Valhalla: You could take you wackos there....just an idea.

Valhalla is definitely not for wackos - it is a place for those who really deserve it.

another point of note. there are a lot of people who believe that people of other religions and beliefs deserve God's punishment, which I assume is worse than death, so these people honestly believe that other faiths should have a fate worse than death, but they live quite, polite lives because they have noted that most religions contain something along the lines of "thou shalt not kill". Would u round them up too? they think it but they dont do it. you see? thinking and doing are most definately not the same.

Yes, thinking and doing are definitely not the same. And Jersay meant those, who are doing. Personally, I don't believe that there is way to pacify people, who are aggressive to other religions and other beliefs, as long as there exist such influential and aggresive religions as Islam and Christianity. What the fanatics do not understand is that the ultimate goal of any established church is not to save souls, and not to reveal the truth to people. The ultimate goal of any established church, as well as any established institution, is to make money. And saving souls (from no one knows what) is just the means of the money-making. Mind that I am not talking about any particular person in any particular church or religion. I am talking about the general policy. The more followers you have - the more money they bring you - the more influential you are. That is why Islam and Christianity (both directly and indirectly) encourage religious fanatics. And I don't think there is a way to change it.
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
Re: RE: Excellent way to get

Toro said:
Its sort of funny that the author of this thread has been banned.

I love irony.

Yes, and I wonder what he was banned for. I miss Jersay - he used to start interesting discussions.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
Vereya:Yes, thinking and doing are definitely not the same.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right , you do whatever first ,and then you think what you've done ,and then you shy away and say..ooops . You aren't very consistent.......if you know what I mean. ____________________________________________________________________
Vereya :That is why Islam and Christianity (both directly and indirectly) encourage religious fanatics. And I don't think there is a way to change it. ____________________

Pehaps..But belive me ,if there is ,it will take another fanatic to do it.Looking for a job?
 

Vereya

Council Member
Apr 20, 2006
2,003
54
48
Tula
Right , you do whatever first ,and then you think what you've done ,and then you shy away and say..ooops . You aren't very consistent.......if you know what I mean.

No, I don't know what you mean. And I don't know when I've been inconsistent. Maybe, you can tell me?

Vereya :That is why Islam and Christianity (both directly and indirectly) encourage religious fanatics. And I don't think there is a way to change it. ____________________

Pehaps..But belive me ,if there is ,it will take another fanatic to do it.Looking for a job?

No, I am not looking for a job. I happen to be employed :lol: And I do not think that it takes one kind of fanaticism to eliminate another kind of fanaticism. Quite the contrary. You have to be a broad-minded person to avoid being a fanatic. And as it takes a certain degree of courage to look beyond the usual limits, set by your society, your religion and your up-bringing, not everyone can be broad-minded. So, let me repeat myself - there will be always religious fanatics, and I don't think there is a way to change it.
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
73
Ottawa ,Canada
What I,'m saying is that a thought is an initiator of action (doing).Everything ,from an invention of a wheel to sending a man to the moon is a produt of thought,
Even when in a process of "doing something",the action is guided by a thought.So ,there is no difference between thought and an action(doing).Perhaps in time ,but I don't think so.

Vereya:No, I am not looking for a job. I happen to be employed And I do not think that it takes one kind of fanaticism to eliminate another kind of fanaticism. Quite the contrary. You have to be a broad-minded person to avoid being a fanatic. And as it takes a certain degree of courage to look beyond the usual limits, set by your society, your religion and your up-bringing, not everyone can be broad-minded. So, let me repeat myself - there will be always religious fanatics, and I don't think there is a way to change it. ____________________________________________________
A "broad minded" person doesn't have to 'avoid' anything. He knowes that by avoiding he will further acknowledge whatever he is avoiding. A "broad minded" person knows that if he doesn't agree with something ...he can simply ignor it.A broad-minded person doesn't see any limits set up by the society .He underststands that ANY kinds of 'limits' are self imposed.A "Broad Minded person doesn' t judge anyone ,knowing that judgging is a sign of insecurity.A "Broad Minded person " doesn't impose his belives on others , he doesn,t have any 'belives'.The Broad Minded person knows thaat it is the belives that seperate . The "Broad Minded " person loves all.
The Broad Minded person makes decissions on his own , etc etc etc etc

Perhaps what I am saying is that the author of this thread picked a wrong topic.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Actually hunting season on whackos would be a great idea. Anyone who'd buy a rifle to shoot whackos would unwittingly be putting himself on the list! So effectively every hunter out there would be on the list of huntables. As I think of this, there just might be awhacko side to me too. Heck, maybe I'd risk getting my name on the list of huntables to go out hunting too. It would be like paint ball games, but with real bullets. Oh definitely hunting season.
 

Explicit_insinuendo

New Member
Oct 5, 2006
14
0
1
What we should all do is round up all the wackos, the Islamic Wackos, (Al Qaida), the Christian Wackos (Pat Robertson) others, the Hindu, the Buddhist, the Pagan, the Atheist wackos and any other wacko who would be described as someone who believes that religious conflict is the way to go. That there religion is better than someone elses religion and that violence is the way to intimidate the other religions and let us send them to Antartica where they will either have to get along (highly unlikely), freeze to death, or kill each other.

Now with a part of the human population gone because of this it will likely cause more peace, more room for people, and people who don't have to listen or be afraid of Wackos.

So who is with me.

Dude, you're not being logical.