Election postponed ?

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
The following was sent to me.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exclusive: Election Day Worries
Newsweek

American counterterrorism officials, citing what they call "alarming" intelligence about a possible Qaeda strike inside the United States this fall, are reviewing a proposal that could allow for the postponement of the November presidential election in the event of such an attack, NEWSWEEK has learned.

The prospect that Al Qaeda might seek to disrupt the U.S. election was a major factor behind last week's terror warning by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. Ridge and other counterterrorism officials concede they have no intel about any specific plots. But the success of March's Madrid railway bombings in influencing the Spanish elections—as well as intercepted "chatter" among Qaeda operatives—has led analysts to conclude "they want to interfere with the elections," says one official.

As a result, sources tell NEWSWEEK, Ridge's department last week asked the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to analyze what legal steps would be needed to permit the postponement of the election were an attack to take place. Justice was specifically asked to review a recent letter to Ridge from DeForest B. Soaries Jr., chairman of the newly created U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Soaries noted that, while a primary election in New York on September 11, 2001, was quickly suspended by that state's Board of Elections after the attacks that morning, "the federal government has no agency that has the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election." Soaries, a Bush appointee who two years ago was an unsuccessful GOP candidate for Congress, wants Ridge to seek emergency legislation from Congress empowering his agency to make such a call. Homeland officials say that as drastic as such proposals sound, they are taking them seriously—along with other possible contingency plans in the event of an election-eve or Election Day attack. "We are reviewing the issue to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election," says Brian Roehrkasse, a Homeland spokesman.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5411741/site/newsweek/

Any history buffs out there? Is there any precedence whatsoever for postponing a presidential election.

What really upsets me is the heinz ketchup attack. They make the best ketchup, politics should stay out of the ketchup business :wink:
 

Isengard

Electoral Member
Do you think that the US government could go as far as planning an attack themselves and put it on Al-Qaeda to be able to win the next election?

If they can kill 1000 United States soldiers in Irak, couldn't they do the same in their own country?

I am just wondering, and want to know what you guys think about it!
 

undergradNITZ

Electoral Member
Aug 6, 2004
529
0
16
Toronto
i heard someone talking about that...just to win an election *shakes head* im not sure if it was my friend or michael moore in F.9/11?
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
I think that evil clown is in on it to! He goes by the name of Ronald. Forget the election, they are going after heinz ketchup now, even I will go to war over something, ketchup sounds like a good cause, its the right color anyway.
 

Can Man

New Member
Aug 25, 2004
6
0
1
They would love to delay the election for about four years. I think they would do anything including falsifiying terror threats.
 

Andem

dev
Mar 24, 2002
5,643
128
63
Larnaka
Falsifying terrorist threats.. sounds very familiar! You'll see much more of that if Bush isn't exposed continually like he was in several publications and documentaries like F. 9.11. Go Bush Go! Continue to incriminate yourself. I'd love to see him infront of the international courts for crimes against humanity.
 

Can Man

New Member
Aug 25, 2004
6
0
1
"I'd love to see him infront of the international courts for crimes against humanity"
Me too but it will never hapen.
 

someguy

New Member
Sep 10, 2004
1
0
1
Let's face it, Bush and Kerry are both members of The Skull and Bones so it's safe to say there is a mutual agenda for the secret society. Perhaps they simply wish to place a veil over the public's eyes, leading them to believe they are in control. With the Bushes tied into oil companies owned by Bin Laden and Kerry's family being linked to the China opium trades, let's face it, this isn't a win win for anyone but the S&B. And if bones members such as Henry Luce who started Time are controlling the media end of the facade it's safe to say you'll never know the truth unless you seek it out yourself.