Durham cop who took kitten from drug user's home faces possible discipline

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,861
3,572
113
Durham cop who took kitten from drug user's home faces possible discipline
By Sam Pazzano, Toronto Sun
First posted: Thursday, December 01, 2016 07:10 PM EST | Updated: Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:36 PM EST
An award-winning Durham Regional Police officer who rescued a “cowering” kitten from a stoned pet-owner’s home will face a police tribunal on Monday, charged with discreditable conduct.
Const. Beth Richardson is accused of “removing a kitten from a residence without the owners’” knowledge or consent on Jan. 12, 2016.
“She was dispatched as a back-up officer to attend an Oshawa home to check on the well-being of a female who had been using drugs (crystal meth) for several days,” the notice of hearing says, adding Richardson “observed a kitten cowering under a table and (believed) it was not being properly cared for.”
She then allegedly removed the kitten — named Tia — but did not let her supervisor or any other officers know, nor did she document the fact she had taken the cat from the owners.
“Const. Richardson had the kitten taken to a veterinarian for a medical check-up where it was medically cleared,” the hearing notices says.
This Police Services Acct offence could land Richardson a demotion if the tribunal decides she was in the wrong.
The 17-year veteran has had no prior complaints and is very allergic to cats. She has a recent commendation for saving a man’s life by staunching the bleeding from a slash to his throat until paramedics arrived.
The calico kitten was filthy, smelled like smoke, and looked very skinny, according to Richardson’s lawyer, Joseph Markson, adding that when police arrived, the cat’s owner was hysterical, screaming, throwing things around, and pulling things off the wall.
“The kitten appeared to be underweight, neglected and had runny eyes. Her food and water dishes were empty and looked as if they had been dried up for days,” Markson said.
“The owner was in a drug-induced frenzy and my client reasonably believed that the kitten was suffering and in immediate danger of being hurt. My client even arranged and paid for the kitten to be examined by a veterinary clinician,” he said, adding that it was Richardson’s intention to take Tia to the humane society when it opened the next morning.
“My client is only guilty of caring for the plight of this poor animal and doing a good deed.”
The notice of hearing indicates the boyfriend of the kitten owner called police in the hours following the visit from officers and demanded the return of the kitten. He also said he wanted the officer charged with theft, alleging it was “caught on tape.”
The kitten was returned to the owner, who opted not to lay a charge, the hearing notice says.
ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUP PRAISES COP
Animal Justice Canada is seeking intervenor status at Const. Beth Richardson’s police tribunal because the legal advocacy group believes it’s a precedent-setting case.
“We believe this hearing is the first time a tribunal has considered a case in which an animal’s interest in being free from harm is relevant to (whether) ... an officer’s actions constitute discreditable conduct,” says the group’s written application to be heard at the Durham Regional Police tribunal scheduled to begin Monday.
Richardson is accused of discreditable conduct under the Police Services Act for taking a kitten named Tia from a home during a call because she felt it was in danger but failing to document it as well as not telling her supervisor, fellow officers or the cat’s owner.
“We are extremely concerned that the prosecution of (Const.) Richardson will have a chilling effect on police officers and citizens who discover animals in distress such as Tia,” Camille Labchuk, a lawyer and the executive director of Animal Justice Canada, said in an interview.
Finding Richardson guilty of discreditable conduct “could deter officers from rescuing animals from distressing emergency situations, for fear that they will be prosecuted,” their application says. “From the perspective of Tia, other custodians of animals and public members generally, the conduct of (Const.) Richardson was exactly the opposite (of discreditable conduct) — rather the coming to the aid of Tia raises or enhances the reputation of the police force.
“The police service exists not only to prevent and investigate crime but also to help the most vulnerable members of our society — including animals,” stated the application.
The allegation also treats the removal of Tia as “theft. In our view, Tia should not be viewed as simple property akin to a piece of furniture.”
Animal Justice Canada argues Tia’s owners were obliged to care for her and when she was placed at risk, her temporary custody by the police officer shouldn’t be viewed as theft.
The group received intervener status in a B.C. bestiality case heard last year at the Supreme Court of Canada.
The group argued that vulnerable animals should also be protected from abuse by people and bestiality isn’t simply a crime against public morals.
spazzano@postmedia.com
Durham Regional Police Const. Beth Richardson, seen with a cat, is facing a tribunal for taking a kitten from a drug user's home without permission or alerting her superiors. (Supplied)

Durham cop who took kitten from drug user's home faces possible discipline | Tor
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
riiiight
cleared by the vet
means the officer stole the cat
protecting it...?
lol
Richardson is accused of discreditable conduct under the Police Services Act for taking a kitten named Tia from a home during a call because she felt it was in danger but failing to document it as well as not telling her supervisor, fellow officers or the cat’s owner.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Demotion means nothing shows up on your record - and you'll have rank back soon. We had a bully cop back home who took full advantage of loss in rank as he bounced between Constable and Sergeant on a regular basis - and retired in good standing on a full pension.

Next time, tell the boss....
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,861
3,572
113
Animal rights advocates claim victory in cat removal case
By Sam Pazzano, Toronto Sun
First posted: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 05:54 PM EST | Updated: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 09:29 PM EST
Animal rights advocates are claiming victory in the case of a Durham Regional Police officer who’s accused of discreditable conduct for removing a distressed kitten from a stoned pet owner’s home.
Animal Justice dropped its bid for intervenor status at a police services act tribunal hearing for Const. Beth Richardson after the prosecution admitted Wednesday that “the removal of the distressed animal was not ... discreditable conduct.”
Richardson, a 17-year veteran, faces discreditable conduct charges for removing Tia the cat from an Oshawa home on Jan. 12, 2016 without the pet owner’s knowledge.
Richardson’s hearing was adjourned until Feb. 7.
Richardson removed the feline, saying it was in distress, cowering and neglected. She answered the call after her owner allegedly had been indulging in crystal meth for four days and was out of control.
Tia has been living and flourishing with a new owner since March, the Toronto Sun has learned.
“In fact, the prosecution’s position is that police officers are required to preserve all life, including animals. It is the manner in which Const. Richardson carried out the removal of the cat, the prosecution considers discreditable conduct,” prosecutor Ian Johnstone insisted at the hearing.
Camille Labchuk, executive director of Animal Justice — an animal law advocacy group — claimed a victory.
“The prosecution admitted today that the police can remove an animal in distress,” said Labchuk.
Richardson’s lawyer, Joseph Markson, added “my client stands by the removal as the right thing to do.
“Now, they are looking at procedural errors in the aftermath of her good decision to remove the kitten,” said Markson.
Lynn Perrier, of Reform Advocates For Animal Welfare, and realtor Caryn Williams have collected more than 14,000 signatures on two petitions supporting the officer.
“She did what any good person would have done and taxpayers dollars are paying for this prosecution,” said Perrier. “It’s just ridiculous. It boggles the mind.”
spazzano@postmedia.com
Tia, the cat removed from the home of an alleged drug user by Durham Regional Police Const. Beth Richardson is pictured in this undated handout photo. (Handout/Postmedia Network)

Animal rights advocates claim victory in cat removal case | Toronto & GTA | News
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
good thing it wasn't a black and it wasn't homeless:
much less life expectancy around cops in some places for those types